Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T05:47:32.958Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Laser ablation of nanoparticles and nanoparticulate, thick Fe1.92Tb0.3Dy0.7 films

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

J. Ma ,
M.F. Becker ,
J.W. Keto  and
D. Kovar
J. Ma*
Affiliation:
Materials Science and Engineering Program, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712
M.F. Becker
Affiliation:
Materials Science and Engineering Program, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712; and Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712
J.W. Keto
Affiliation:
Materials Science and Engineering Program, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712; and Department of Physics, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712
D. Kovar*
Affiliation:
Materials Science and Engineering Program, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712; and Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712
*
a)Present address: Northrup Grumman Aerospace Systems, One Space Park, Redondo Beach, CA 90278.
b)Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Two laser processes, flat plate ablation (FPA) and laser ablation of microparticle aerosols (LAMA), capable of producing nanoparticles and nanoparticulate thick films of Terfenol-D (Fe1.92Tb0.3Dy0.7) were investigated. The influence of processing parameters on the sizes, compositions, and morphologies of the nanoparticles produced using these processes were studied by transmission electron microscopy. The nanoparticles were used to deposit nanoparticulate films by supersonic impaction with thicknesses ranging from 4 to 50 μm, depending on processing conditions. The microstructures and properties of the films were studied using scanning electron microscopy and magnetometry. The LAMA process produced nanoparticles with a mean size and standard deviation (SD) of 8 to 10 nm ± 5 nm, depending on the type of gas used during synthesis. In contrast, nanoparticles produced using the FPA process exhibited a much broader size distribution varying from 5 to 150 nm and a much greater variation in compositions compared to the LAMA process. Films produced using LAMA also had lower levels of porosity compared to those produced using FPA as a result of the smaller, more uniform nanoparticles from which they were produced and the resulting higher impaction velocities. Compared to the FPA-produced films, the LAMA-produced films exhibited greater resistance to oxidation, higher magnetizations (13–15 emu/g versus 9–11 emu/g, depending on processing conditions) and lower coercivities (versus 41–59 Oe versus 80–110 Oe).

Keywords

Magnetic PropertiesFilmNanostructure
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 25 , Issue 9 , September 2010 , pp. 1733 - 1740
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Dietz, T.G., Duncan, M.A., Powers, D.E., Smalley, R.E.Laser production of supersonic metal cluster beams. J. Chem. Phys. 74, 6511 (1981)Google Scholar
2.Becker, M.F., Brock, J.R., Cai, H., Henneke, D.E., Keto, J.W., Lee, J., Nichols, W.T., Glicksman, H.D.Metal nanoparticles generated by laser ablation. Nanostruct. Mater. 10, 853 (1998)Google Scholar
3.Nichols, W.T., Keto, J.W., Henneke, D.E., Brock, J.R., Malyavanatham, G., Becker, M.F., Glicksman, H.D.Large-scale production of nanocrystals by laser ablation of microparticles in a flowing aerosol. Appl. Phys. Lett. 78, 1128 (2001)Google Scholar
4.Lee, J., Becker, M.F., Keto, J.W.Dynamics of laser ablation of microparticles prior to nanoparticle generation. J. Appl. Phys. 89, 8146 (2001)Google Scholar
5.Kashu, S., Fuchita, E., Manabe, T., Hayashi, C.Deposition of ultra fine particles using a gas jet. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 23, L910 (1984)Google Scholar
6.Akedo, J., Lebedev, M., Nakano, S., Ogiso, H.Aerosol deposition for nanocomposite material synthesis: A novel method for ceramics processing without firing. Ceram. Eng. Sci. Proc. 24, 9 (2003)Google Scholar
7.Huang, C., Nichols, W.T., O'Brien, D.T., Becker, M.F., Keto, J.W., Kovar, D.Supersonic jet deposition of silver nanoparticle aerosols: Correlations of impact conditions and film morphologies. J. Appl. Phys. 101, 064902 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Quandt, E., Gerlach, B., Seemann, K.Preparation and applications of magnetostrictive thin films. J. Appl. Phys. 76, 7000 (2004)Google Scholar
9.Wada, M., Uchida, H-H., Matsumura, Y., Uchida, H., Kaneko, H.Preparation of films of (Tb,Dy)Fe2 giant magnetostrictive alloy by ion beam sputtering process and their characterization. Thin Solid Films 281–282, 503 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Ma, J., O'Brien, D.T., Kovar, D.Amorphous Terfenol-D films using nanosecond pulsed laser deposition. Thin Solid Films 5187, 319 (2009)Google Scholar
11.Grabham, N.J., White, N.M., Beeby, S.P.Thick-film magnetostrictive material for MEMS. Electron. Lett. 36, 332 (2000)Google Scholar
12.Henneke, D.E.Nanoparticles produced via laser ablation of microparticles. Ph.D. Dissertation University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 2001Google Scholar
13.Nichols, W.T., Malyavanatham, G., Henneke, D.E., O'Brien, D.T., Becker, M.F., Keto, J.W.Bimodal nanoparticle size distributions produced by laser ablation of microparticles in aerosols. J. Nanopart. Res. 4, 423 (2002)Google Scholar
14.Kodama, R.H., Berkowitz, A.E., McNiff, E.J., Foner, S.Surface spin disorder in ferrite nanoparticles. Mater. Sci. Forum 235–238, 643 (1997)Google Scholar
15.Batlle, X., Labarta, A.Finite-size effects in fine particles: Magnetic and transport properties. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 35, R15 (2002)Google Scholar
16.Chen, D-H., He, X-R.Synthesis of nickel ferrite nanoparticles by sol-gel method. Mater. Res. Bull. 36, 1369 (2001)Google Scholar
17.Koch, J., Schlamp, S., Rosgen, T., Fliegel, D., Gunther, D.Visualization of aerosol particles generated by near infrared nano- and femtosecond laser ablation. Spectrochim. Acta, Part B 62, 20 (2007)Google Scholar
18.Nichols, W.T., Malyavanatham, G., Henneke, D.E., Brock, J.R., Becker, M.F., Keto, J.W., Glicksman, H.D.Gas and pressure dependence for the mean size of nanoparticles produced by laser ablation of flowing aerosols. J. Nanopart. Res. 2, 141 (2000)Google Scholar
19.Nichols, W.T.Production and controlled collection of nanoparticles: Toward manufacturing of nanostructured materials. Ph.D. Dissertation University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 2002Google Scholar
20.Chrisey, D.B., Hubler, G.K.Pulsed Laser Deposition of Thin Films (John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York 1994)Google Scholar
21.Dowben, P.A., Ning, W., Palina, N., Modrow, H., Muller, R., Hormes, J., Losovyj, Y.B.Surface segregation in multicomponent clustersDegradation Processes in Nanostructured Materials edited by M. Chipara, O. Puglisi, R. Skomski, F.R. Jones, and B.S. Hsiao (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 887, Warrendale, PA 2006)209Google Scholar
22.van Dover, R.B., Gyorgy, E.M., Frankenthal, R.P., Hong, M., Siconolfi, D.J.Effect of oxidation on the magnetic properties of unprotected TbFe thin films. J. Appl. Phys. 59, 1291 (1986)Google Scholar
23.Hayes, J.P., Stone, L.A., Snelling, H.V., Jenner, A.G., Greenough, R.D.Magnetic and magnetoelastic properties of thin films by pulsed laser deposition. IEEE Trans. Magn. 33, 3613 (1997)Google Scholar
24.Jenner, A.G., Hayes, J.P., Stone, L.A., Snelling, H.V., Greenough, R.D.Pulsed laser deposition: An alternative route to the growth of magnetic thin films. Appl. Surf. Sci. 138–139, 408 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25.Quandt, E.Giant magnetostrictive thin films technologiesHandbook of Giant Magnetostrictive Materials edited by G. Engdahl (Harcourt, San Diego, CA 2000)323Google Scholar
26.Akedo, J., Lebedev, M.Influence of carrier gas conditions on electrical and optical properties of Pb(Zr, Ti)O3 thin films prepared by aerosol deposition method. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 40, 5528 (2001)Google Scholar