Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T16:58:50.709Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Interfacial reactions in the Sn–20 at.% In/Cu and Sn–20 at.% In/Ni couples at 160 °C

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2006

Shih-kang Lin
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering, National Tsing Hua University, Hsin-chu, Taiwan 300, Republic of China
Sinn-wen Chen*
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering, National Tsing Hua University, Hsin-chu, Taiwan 300, Republic of China
*
a) Address all correspondence to this author.e-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Sn–In alloys are promising low-melting-point Pb-free solders. Cu and Ni are common substrates in the electronic products. This study examines the interfacial reactions in the Sn–20 at.% In(γ–InSn4)/Cu and Sn–20 at.% In/Ni couples at 160 °C. Only the η–Cu6Sn5 phase layer is formed in the Sn–20 at.% In/Cu couple, and the layer grows thicker with longer reaction time. The reaction path is γ–InSn4/η–Cu6Sn5/Cu. A peculiar phenomenon with the bulging of the couple near the Ni substrate is found in the Sn–20 at.% In/Ni couple. A liquid phase is formed by interfacial reaction in the solid/solid Sn–20 at.% In/Ni couple at 160 °C, and the reaction path is γ–InSn4/liquid/δ–Ni3Sn4 + liquid/(δ–Ni3Sn4)/Ni. Usually Ni has a slower reaction rate with solders; however, the consumption rates of Ni substrate are much higher than those of Cu substrate in this study when they are in contact with the Sn–20 at.% In alloy at 160 °C due to the formation of the liquid phase in the Sn–20 at.% In/Ni couple.

Keywords

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Official Journal of the European Union, L 37/19, 13.2 (2003).Google Scholar
2. “Lead-free assembly projects”, National Electronics Manufacturing Initiatives, http://www.nemi.org/projects/ese/lf_assembly.html (1999).Google Scholar
3.Humpston, G., Jacobson, D.M.: Indium solder. Adv. Mater. Processes 163, April, 45 (2005).Google Scholar
4.Chen, S.-W., Lin, S.-K., Yang, C.-F.: Interfacial reactions in the Pb-free composite solder with indium layers. J. Electron. Mater. 35, 72 (2006).Google Scholar
5.Yasuda, K., Kim, J.M., Yasuda, M., Fujimoto, K.: Formation of a self-interconnected joint using a low-melting-point alloy adhesive. Mater. Trans. 45, 799 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Sommadossi, S., Gust, W., Mittemeijer, E.J.: Phase characterization and kinetic behaviour of diffusion soldered Cu/In/Cu interconnections. Mater. Sci. Technol. 19, 528 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Huang, C-Y., Chen, S-W.: Interfacial reactions in In-Sn/Ni couples and phase equilibria of the In-Sn-Ni system. J. Electron. Mater. 31, 152 (2002).Google Scholar
8.Freer, J.L., Morris, J.W. Jr.: Microstructure and creep of eutectic indium/tin on copper and nickel substrates. J. Electron. Mater. 21, 647 (1992).Google Scholar
9.Lin, K-L., Chen, C-J.: Autocatalytic Ni–Cu–P barrier between 51In–49Sn solder and Al. Int. J. Microcircuits Electron. Packag. 20, 46 (1997).Google Scholar
10.Okamoto, H. In-Sn (indium-tin)*. Phase Diagrams of Indium Alloys and Their Engineering Applications edited by White, C.E.T. and Okamoto, H. (ASM International, Materials Park, OH, 1992), pp. 255257.Google Scholar
11.Lin, S.-K., Chung, D.-Y., Chen, S.-W., and Yen, Y.-W.: 250 °C isothermal section of the ternary Sn–In–Cu phase equilibria (unpublished).Google Scholar
12.Okamoto, H.: Comment on Cu-In (copper-indium). J. Phase Equilibria 15, 226 (1994).Google Scholar
13.Saunders, N., Miodownik, A.P.: The Cu-Sn (copper-tin) system. Bulletin of Alloy Phase Diagrams. 11, 278 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Vianco, P.T., Hlava, P.F., Kilgo, A.C.: Intermetallic compound layer formation between copper and hot-dipped 100In, 50In–50Sn, 100Sn, and 63Sn–37Pb coatings. J. Electron. Mater. 23, 583 (1994).Google Scholar
15.Ramig, A.D. Jr., Yost, F.G., and Hlava, P.F.: Intermetallic layer growth in Cu/Sn–In solder joints, Microbeam Analysis 1984, Proceedings of the 19th Annual Conference of the Microbeam Analysis Society, edited by Romig, A.D. Jr. and Goldstein, J.I. (San Francisco Press, San Francisco, CA, 1984), pp. 8792.Google Scholar
16.Chuang, T.H., Yu, C.L., Chang, S.Y., Wang, S.S.: Phase identification and growth kinetics of the intermetallic compounds formation during In–49Sn/Cu soldering reactions. J. Electron. Mater. 31, 640 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar