Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T15:27:03.566Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Extrinsic contributions to the grain size dependence of relaxor ferroelectric Pb(Mg1/3Nb2/3)O3: PbTiO3 ceramics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

C.A. Randall ,
A.D. Hilton ,
D.J. Barber  and
T.R. Shrout
C.A. Randall
Affiliation:
Materials Research Laboratory, The Pennsylvania State University, University, Park, Pennsylvania 16802
A.D. Hilton
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, University of Essex, Wivenhoe Park, Colchester, Essex, United Kingdom
D.J. Barber
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, University of Essex, Wivenhoe Park, Colchester, Essex, United Kingdom
T.R. Shrout
Affiliation:
Materials Research Laboratory, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802
Get access

Abstract

This paper addresses the observed grain size with dependence of the dielectric behavior for Pb(Mg1/3Nb2/3)O3: PbTiO3 ceramics grain sizes ≥ 1.0 μm. A combined transmission electron microscopy (TEM) analysis and dielectric characterization are modeled with a modified brick wall approach. From this model, it is possible to extrapolate information such as single crystal values of dielectric maximum, Kmax, the diffuseness coefficient, δ, and the average intergranular thickness for relaxor ceramics. The calculated intergranular thickness agrees well with TEM observations, ≍2.0 nm. This semi-empirical method may be potentially useful in development work of relaxor ceramics to predict the optimized dielectric properties obtainable within microstructural restrictions.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 8 , Issue 4 , April 1993 , pp. 880 - 884
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1Shrout, Thomas R. and Halliyal, Arvind, Am. Ceram. Soc. Bull. 66 (4), 704 (1987).Google Scholar
2Swartz, S.L. and Shrout, T.R., Mater. Res. Bull. XVIII, 663–667 (1983).Google Scholar
3Shrout, T.R., Kumar, U., Megherhi, M., Wang, W., and Jang, S.J., Ferroelectrics 76, 474–487 (1989).Google Scholar
4Clarke, D. R., J. Appl. Phys. 49 (4), 2407 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5Kraneek, O. L., Shaw, T. M., and Thomas, G., J. Appl. Phys. 50 (6), 4223 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6Wang, H.C. and Schulze, W.A., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 73 (4), 825 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7Gorton, A.J., Chen, J., Chan, H., Smyth, D., and Harmer, M. P., Proc. 6th IEEE Int. Symp. Appl. Ferroelec, 150–153 (1988).Google Scholar
8Randall, C.A., Barber, D.J., and Whatmore, R.W., J. Mater. Sci. 21, 925 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9Buessem, W. R., Cross, L. E., and Goswami, A. H., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 49, 33 (1966).Google Scholar
10Arlt, G., Ferroelectrics 104, 217–227 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11Smolenskii, G.A., J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 28, Suppl. 26 (1970).Google Scholar