Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T06:18:32.309Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Engineering aerosol-through-plasma torch ceramic particulate structures: Influence of precursor composition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

Jonathan Phillips*
Affiliation:
Los Alamos National Laboratory, MST-7, Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545; and University of New Mexico, Mechanical Engineering, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87131
Claudia Luhrs
Affiliation:
University of New Mexico, Mechanical Engineering, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87131
Chunyun Peng
Affiliation:
University of New Mexico, Mechanical Engineering, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87131
Paul Fanson
Affiliation:
Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing North America, Inc., Catalyst Materials, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48105
Hugo Zea
Affiliation:
University of New Mexico, Mechanical Engineering, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87131
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

This is the second in a series of articles demonstrating the unique character of the aerosol-through-plasma (A-T-P) process for producing nanoparticles. This study is focused on the impact of two parameters, cation ratio (1:3, 1:1, 3:1) and solvent (evaporated prior to generation of aerosol), on the structures of Ce:Al oxides particles. These two simple changes were found to impact virtually every aspect of particle structure, including the fraction of hollow versus solid, fraction of nanoparticles, phase structure, and even the existence of surface phase segregation. CeAl mixed oxides were found only over a limited range of compositions, and that range was a function of the solvent. At all other cation ratios, only ceria was a crystalline phase, and most if not all the alumina is amorphous. It is notable that the fraction of hollow micron-sized particles and nanoparticles is greatly influenced by the cation ratio and solvent identity. Indeed, significant numbers of nanoparticles were only produced using an aqueous precursor with a Ce:Al ratio of 1:1. Another unique finding is that phase segregation exists in individual particles on the length scale of nanometers. This study compliments an earlier study of the influence of operating conditions on particle structure. Taken together, the studies suggest a means to engineer (as well as limits to the engineering possibilities) ceramic particle structures using the A-T-P method.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1Luhrs, C.C., Phillips, J.Fanson, P.: Production of complex cerium- aluminum oxides using an atmospheric pressure plasma torch. Langmuir 23, 7055 2007CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2Phillips, J., Gleiman, S.Chen, C.K.: Method for preparing spherical particles of boron nitride. U.S. Patent No. 6 652 822 (November 2003)Google Scholar
3Gleiman, S., Chen, C-K., Datye, A.Phillips, J.: Melting and spheroidization of hexagonal boron nitride in a microwave-powered, atmospheric pressure nitrogen plasma. J. Mater. Sci. 37, 3429 2002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4Phillips, J., Kroenke, W.Perry, W.L.: Method for producing metallic nanoparticles. U.S. Patent No. 6 689 192 (February 2004)Google Scholar
5Weigle, J.C., Luhrs, C.C., Chen, C.K., Perry, W.L., Mang, J.T., Lopez, G.P.Phillips, J.: Generation of aluminum nanoparticles using an atmospheric pressure plasma torch. J. Phys. Chem. B 108, 1860 2004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6Phillips, J., Gleiman, S.Chen, C.K.: Low-power plasma torch method for the production of crystalline spherical ceramic particles. J. Mater. Res. 16, 1256 2001Google Scholar
7Phillips, J., Gleiman, S.Chen, C-K.: Method for producing ceramic particles and agglomerates. U.S. Patent No. 6 261 484 B1 (July 2001)Google Scholar
8Phillips, J.: Plasma generation of supported metal catalysts. U.S. Patent No. 5 989 648 (November 1999)Google Scholar
9Zea, H., Chen, C-K., Lester, K., Phillips, A., Datye, A., Fonseca, I.Phillips, J.: Plasma torch production of carbon supported metal catalysts. Catal. Today 89, 237 2004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10Chen, C-K., Perry, W.L.Phillips, J.: Plasma torch production of macroscopic carbon nanotube structures. Carbon 41, 2555 2003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11Chou, C.H.Phillips, J.: Plasma production of metallic nanoparticles. J. Mater. Res. 7, 2107 1992CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12Kim, J.H., Hong, Y.C.Uhm, H.S.: Synthesis of oxide nanoparticles via microwave plasma decomposition of initial materials. Surf. Coat. Technol. 201, 5114 2007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13Tong, L.Reddy, R.G.: Thermal plasma synthesis of SiC nano-powders/nano-fibers. Mater. Res. Bull. 41, 2303 2006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14Messing, G.L., Zhang, S.C.Jayanthi, G.V.: Ceramic powder synthesis by spray pyrolysis. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 76, 2707 1993CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15Gurav, A., Kodas, T., Pluym, T.Xiong, Y.: Aerosol processing of materials. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 19, 411 1993CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16Chen, C-K.Phillips, J.: Impact of aerosol particles on the structure of an atmospheric pressure microwave plasma afterglow. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 35, 998 2002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17Stark, W.J.Pratsinis, S.E.: Aerosol flame reactors for manufacture of nanoparticles. Powder Technol. 126, 103 2002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18Madler, L., Stark, W.J.Pratsinis, S.E.: Flame-made ceria nanoparticles. J. Mater. Res. 17, 1356 2002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19Schulz, H., Stark, W.J., Maciejewski, M., Pratsinis, S.E.Baiker, A.: Flame-made nanocrystalline ceria/zirconia doped with alumina or silica: Structural properties and enhanced oxygen exchange capacity. J. Mater. Chem. 13, 2979 2003CrossRefGoogle Scholar