Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T06:46:49.115Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effect of supersaturation of Cu on reaction and intermetallic compound formation between Sn–Cu solder and thin film metallization

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

J. S. Ha
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Seoul National University, Seoul 151–742, Korea
T. S. Oh*
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Hongik University, Seoul 121–791, Korea
K. N. Tu
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, UCLA, Los Angeles, California 90095–1595
*
a) Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Interfacial reactions and intermetallic compound formation of the eutectic Sn–0.7Cu and hypereutectic Sn–3Cu on thin film metallization of Al/Ni/Cu, Al/Cu, and Al/Ni were investigated. While the Ni layer of Al/Ni/Cu was almost consumed by Sn–0.7Cu after one reflow at 240 °C, most of it was preserved with Sn–3Cu even after ten reflows. Since the Cu content in Sn–0.7Cu is below the solubility limit of Cu in Sn at 240 °C, the Cu layer of Al/Ni/Cu was dissolved completely into Sn–0.7Cu, and the Ni was exposed to the molten solder to form intermetallics. As Cu content in Sn–3Cu is more than the solubility limit, intermetallics formed between the solder and the Cu layer, but not the Ni layer, of Al/Ni/Cu. The supersaturation of Cu in Sn–3Cu was found to be beneficial in reducing the interfacial intermetallic compound formation and in improving the interfacial stability.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Tu, K.N. and Zeng, K., Mater. Sci. Eng. 34, 1 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Tummala, R.R. and Rymaszewski, E.J., Microelectronics Packaging Handbook (Von Nostrand Reinhold, New York, 1989), p. 391.Google Scholar
3.Liu, C.Y., Kim, H.K., Tu, K.N., and Totta, P.A., Appl. Phys. Lett. 69, 4041 (1996).Google Scholar
4.Jang, J.W., Kim, P.G., Tu, K.N., Frear, D.R., and Thompson, P., J. Appl. Phys. 85, 8456 (1999).Google Scholar
5.Lau, J.H., Low Cost Flip Chip Technologies (McGraw-Hill, New York, 2000), p. 511.Google Scholar
6.Lau, J.H., Low Cost Flip Chip Technologies (McGraw-Hill, New York, 2000), p. 183.Google Scholar
7.FCIP and Expanding Markets for Flip Chip (Techsearch International, Inc., Austin, TX, 1997).Google Scholar
8.Jang, W., Kim, P.G., Tu, K.N., and Lee, M., J. Mater. Res. 14, 3895 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Liu, C.Y., Tu, K.N., Sheng, T.T., Tung, C.H., Frear, D.R., and Elenius, P., J. Appl. Phys. 87, 750 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Li, M., Zhang, F., Chen, W.T., Zeng, K., Tu, K.N., Balkan, H., and Elenius, P., J. Mater. Res. 17, 1612 (2002).Google Scholar
11.Suganuma, K., Solid State Mater. Sci. 5, 55 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Abtew, M. and Selvaduray, G., Mater. Sci. Eng. 27, 95 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Jang, J.W., Frear, D.R., Lee, T.Y., and Tu, K.N., J. Appl. Phys. 88, 6359 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Kang, S.K., Shih, D.Y., Fogel, K., Lauro, P., Yim, M.J., Advocate, G., Griffin, M., Goldsmith, C., Henderson, D.W., Gosselin, T., King, D., Konrad, J., Sarkhel, A., and K. Putlitz, J., in Proc. 51st Electronic Components and Technol. Conf., Orlando, FL (IEEE Standards Office, Piscataway, NJ, 2001), p. 448.Google Scholar
15.Frear, D.R., Burchett, S.N., Morgan, H.S., and Lau, J.H., The Mechanics of Solder Alloy Interconnects (Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, 1994), p. 45.Google Scholar
16.Park, J.Y., Ha, J.S., Kang, C.S., Shin, K.S., Kim, M.I., and Jung, J.P., J. Electron. Mater. 28, 1145 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Kim, P.G., Jang, J.W., Lee, T.Y., and Yu, K.N., J. Appl. Phys. 86, 6746 (1999).Google Scholar
18.Zeng, K. and Tu, K.N., Mater. Sci. Eng. R38, 55 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar