Hostname: page-component-f554764f5-nqxm9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-11T04:32:21.607Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Dislocation–grain boundary interactions in martensitic steel observed through in situ nanoindentation in a transmission electron microscope

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 December 2004

T. Ohmura ,
A.M. Minor ,
E.A. Stach  and
J.W. Morris
T. Ohmura*
Affiliation:
Steel Research Center, National Institute for Materials Science, Ibaraki 304-0047, Japan
A.M. Minor
Affiliation:
National Center for Electron Microscopy, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720
E.A. Stach
Affiliation:
National Center for Electron Microscopy, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720
J.W. Morris
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, California; and Materials Science Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720
*
a) Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Dislocation–interface interactions in Fe–0.4 wt% C tempered martensitic steel were studied through in situ nanoindentation in a transmission electron microscope (TEM). Two types of boundaries were imaged in the dislocated martensitic structure: a low-angle (probable) lath boundary and a coherent, high-angle (probable) block boundary. In the case of a low-angle grain boundary, the dislocations induced by the indenter piled up against the boundary. As the indenter penetrated further, a critical stress appeared to have been reached, and a high density of dislocations was suddenly emitted on the far side of the grain boundary into the adjacent grain. In the case of the high-angle grain boundary, the numerous dislocations that were produced by the indentation were simply absorbed into the boundary, with no indication of pileup or the transmission of strain. This surprising observation is interpreted on the basis of the crystallography of the block boundary.

Keywords

DislocationsGrain boundariesTransmission electron microscopy (TEM)
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 19 , Issue 12 , December 2004 , pp. 3626 - 3632
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

1Hall, E.O.: The deformation and ageing of mild steel. Proc. R. Soc. B 64, 747 (1951).Google Scholar
2Petch, N.J.: The cleavage strength of polycrystals. J. Iron Steel Inst. 174, 25 (1953).Google Scholar
3Li, J.C.M.: Petch relation and grain boundary sources. Trans. AIME 227, 239 (1963).Google Scholar
4Ashby, M.F.: The deformation of plastically non-homogeneous materials. Philos. Mag. 21, 399 (1970).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5Morris, J.W. Jr.: The influence of grain size on the mechanical properties of steel, in Proc. Int. Symposium on Ultrafine Grained Steels, edited by Takaki, S. and Maki, T. (Iron and Steel Inst., Tokyo, Japan, 2001), p. 34.Google Scholar
6Hauser, J.J. and Chalmers, B.: The plastic deformation of bicrystals of f.c.c. metals. Acta Metall. 9, 802 (1961).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7Carrington, W.E. and McLean, D.: Slip nuclei in silicon-iron. Acta Metall. 13, 493 (1965).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8Shen, Z., Wagoner, R.H. and Clark, W.A.T.: Dislocation pile-up and grain boundary interactions in 304 stainless steel. Acta Metall. 36, 3231 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9Kurzydlowski, K.J., Varin, R.A. and Zielinski, W.: In situ investigation of the early stages of plastic deformation in an austenitic stainless steel. Acta Metall. 32, 71 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10Lee, T.C., Robertson, I.M. and Birnbaum, H.K.: An in situ transmission electron-microscope deformation study of the slip transfer mechanisms in metals. Metall. Trans. 21A, 2437 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11Maki, T., Tsuzaki, K. and Tamura, I.: The morphology of microstructure composed of lath martensites in steels. Trans. ISIJ 20, 207 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12Kim, H.J., Kim, Y.H. and Morris, J.W. Jr.: Thermal mechanisms of grain and packet refinement in a lath martensitic steel. ISIJ Int. 38, 1277 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13Ohmura, T., Tsuzaki, K. and Matsuoka, S.: Nanohardness measurement of high-purity Fe-C martensite. Scripta Mater. 45, 889 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14Ohmura, T., Tsuzaki, K. and Matsuoka, S.: Evaluation of the matrix strength of Fe-0.4 wt% C tempered martensite using nanoindentation techniques. Philos. Mag. A 82, 1903 (2002).Google Scholar
15Ohmura, T., Hara, T. and Tsuzaki, K.: Relationship between nanohardness and microstructures in high-purity Fe-C as-quenched and quench-tempered martensite. J. Mater. Res. 18, 1465 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16Ohmura, T., Hara, T. and Tsuzaki, K.: Evaluation of temper softening behavior of Fe-C binary martensitic steels by nanoindentation. Scripta Mater. 49, 1157 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17Morris, J.W. Jr.Lee, C.S. and Guo, Z.: The nature and consequences of coherent transformations in steel. ISIJ Int. 43, 410 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18Guo, Z., Lee, C.S.Morris, J.W. Jr.: On coherent transformations in steel. Acta Mater. 52, 5511 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19Minor, A.M., Stach, E.A. and Morris, J.W. Jr.: Quantitative in situ nanoindentation in an electron microscope. Appl. Phys. Lett. 79, 1625 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20Stach, E.A., Freeman, T., Minor, A.M., Owen, D.K., Cumings, J., Wall, M.A., Chraska, T., Hull, R.Morris, J.W. Jr.Zettl, A. and Dahmen, U.: Development of a nanoindenter for in situ transmission electron microscopy. Microsc. Microanal. 7, 507 (2001).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21Marder, A.R. and Krauss, G.: The morphology of martensite in iron-carbon alloys. Trans. ASM 60, 651 (1967).Google Scholar
22Marder, J.M. and Marder, A.R.: The morphology of iron-nickel massive martensite. Trans. ASM 62, 1 (1969).Google Scholar
23Morito, S., Tanaka, H., Konishi, R., Furuhara, T. and Maki, T.: The morphology and crystallography of lath martensite in Fe-C alloys. Acta Mater. 51, 1789 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24Guo, Z. The limit of strength and toughness of steel. Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Materials Science, Univ. of California, Berkeley, CA (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar