Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T13:43:04.476Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Damages and Microstructural Variation of High-lead and Eutectic SnPb Composite Flip Chip Solder Bumps Induced by Electromigration

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2005

Yeh-Hsiu Liu
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan 701, Republic of China
Kwang-Lung Lin*
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan 701, Republic of China
*
a) Address all correspondence to this author.e-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

The electromigration behavior of the high-lead and eutectic SnPb composite solder bumps was investigated at 150 °C with 5 × 103 A/cm2 current stressing for up to 1711 h. The diameter of the bumps was about 125 μm. The underbump metallization (UBM) on the chip side was sputtered Al/Ni(V)/Cu thin films, and the Cu pad on the board side was plated with electroless Ni/Au. It was observed that damages occurred in the joints in a downward electron flow (from chip side to the substrate side), while those joints having the opposite current polarity showed only minor changes. In the case of downward electron flow, electromigration damages were observed in the UBM and solder bumps. The vanadium in Ni(V) layer was broken under current stressing of 1711 h while it was still intact after current stressing of 1000 h. The electron probe microanalyzer (EPMA) elemental mapping clearly shows that the Al atoms in the trace migrated through the UBM into the solder bump during current stressing. Voids were found in the solder bump near the UBM/solder interface. The Sn-rich phases of the solder bumps showed gradual streaking and reorientation upon current stressing. This resulted in the formation of uniaxial Sn-rich phases in the middle of the solder bump, while the columnar and fibrous Sn-rich phases were formed in the surrounding regions. The formation mechanism of electromigration-induced damage to the UBM structure and solder bump were discussed.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1Semiconductor, The International Technology Roadmap for 1999.Google Scholar
2Powell, D.O. and Trivedi, A.K.: Flip-chip on FR-4 integrated circuit packaging, in Proc. 43rd Electronic Components and Technology Conference (IEEE Components, Packaging and Manufacturing Technology Society, Orlando, FL, 1993), pp. 182186.Google Scholar
3Lau, J.H.: Ball Grid Array Technology (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1995).Google Scholar
4Mahajan, R., Brown, K. and Atluri, V. The evolution of microprocessor packaging. Intel Technol J. Q3 (2000).Google Scholar
5Brandenberg, S. and Yeh, S.: Electromigration studies of flip chip bump solder joints, in Surface Mount International Conference and Exposition, SMI 98 Proceedings (1998), p. 337.Google Scholar
6Lee, T.Y., Tu, K.N. and Frear, D.F.: Electromigration of eutectic SnPb and SnAg3.8Cu0.7 flip chip solder bumps and under-bump metallization. J. Appl. Phys. 90, 4502 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7Liu, C.Y., Chen, C., Liao, C.N. and Tu, K.N.: Microstructure-electromigration correlation in a thin stripe of eutectic SnPb solder stressed between Cu electrodes. Appl. Phys. Lett. 75, 58 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8Choi, W.J., Yeh, E.C.C., and Tu, K.N.: Electromigration of flip chip solder bump on Cu/Ni(V)/Al thin film under bump metallization, in Proc. 52nd Electronic Components and Technology Conference (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, 2002), p. 1201.Google Scholar
9Lee, T.Y., Tu, K.N., Kuo, S.M. and Frear, D.R.: Electromigration of eutectic SnPb solder interconnects for flip chip technology. J. Appl. Phys. 89, 3189 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10Nah, J.W., Paik, K.W., Suh, J.O. and Tu, K.N.: Mechanism of electromigration-induced failure in the 97Pb–3Sn and 37Pb–63Sn composite solder joint. J. Appl. Phys. 94, 7560 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11Gupta, D., Vieregge, K. and Gust, W.: Interface diffusion in eutectic Pb–Sn solder. Acta Mater 47, 5 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12Huntington, H.B. and Grone, A.R.: Current-induced marker motion in gold wires. J. Phys. Chem. Solids 20, 76 (1961).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13Yeh, E.C.C., Choi, W.J., Tu, K.N., Elenius, P. and Balkan, H.: Current-crowding-induced electromigration failure in flip chip solder joints. Appl. Phys. Lett. 80, 580 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14Liu, Y.H., Chuang, C.M. and Lin, K.L.: Failure behavior upon shear test of 5Sn-95Pb solder bump after high temperature reliability test. J. Mater. Res. 19, 2471 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15Grivas, D., Frear, D., Quan, L., Morris, J.W. Jr.: The formation of Cu3Sn intermetallic on the reaction of Cu with 95Pb–5Sn solder. J. Electron. Mater. 15, 355 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16Kim, H.K. and Tu, K.N.: Kinetic analysis of the soldering reaction between eutectic SnPb alloy and Cu accompanied by ripening. Phys. Rev. B 53, 16027 (1996).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17Hansen, M. and Anderko, K.: Constitution of Binary Alloys, 2nd ed. (GP Publishing Co., Schenectady, NY, 1985).Google Scholar
18Zribi, A., Clark, A., Zavalij, L., Borgesen, P. and Cotts, E.J.: The growth of intermetallic compounds at Sn–Ag–Cu solder/Cu and Sn–Ag–Cu solder/Ni interfaces and the associated evolution of the solder microstructure. J. Electron. Mater 30, 1157 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19Park, L.Y., Yang, C.W., Ha, J.S., Kim, C.U., Kwon, E.J., Jung, S.B. and Kang, C.S.: Investigation of interfacial reaction between Sn–Ag eutectic solder and Au/Ni/Cu/Ti thin film metallization. J. Electron. Mater 30, 1165 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20Zeng, K., Vuorinen, V., and Kivilahti, J.K.: Intermetallic reactions between lead-free SnAgCu solder and Ni(P)/Au surface finish on PWBs, in Proceedings of 51st Electronic Component & Technology Conference (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, 2001), p. 693.Google Scholar
21Chen, W.T., Ho, C.E. and Kao, C.R.: Effect of Cu concentration on the interfacial reactions between Ni and Sn–Cu solders. J. Mater. Res. 17, 263 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22Gjostein, N.A. In Diffusion, edited by Aaronson, H.I. (ASM, Metals Park, OH, 1973), Chap. 9, p. 241.Google Scholar
23Ye, H., Basaran, C. and Hopkins, D.: Thermomigration in Pb–Sn solder joints under joule heating during electric current stressing. Appl. Phys. Lett. 82, 1045 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24Bader, W.G.: Dissolution of Au, Ag, Pd, Pt, Cu, and Ni in a molten tin-lead solder. Welding J: Res. Suppl. 48 551s (1969).Google Scholar
25Lloyd, J.R.: Electromigration induced resistance decrease in Sn conductors. J. Appl. Phys. 94, 6483 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26Burckbuchler, F.V. and Reynolds, C.A.: Anisotropy of the residual resistivity of tin with Sb, In, Zn, and Cd impurities, and the ideal resistivities and deviations from Matthiessen’s rule at 77 and 273 K. Phys. Rev. 175, 550 (1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27Rayme, J.A. and Chandresekhar, B.S.: Elastic constant of β tin from 4.2 K to 300 K. Phys. Rev. 120, 1658 (1960).CrossRefGoogle Scholar