Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T07:50:47.575Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Compact polymeric 3D prints of high stability

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 July 2014

Goetz Peter Hellmann*
Affiliation:
Fraunhofer LBF, Darmstadt 64289, Germany
Christoph Kottlorz
Affiliation:
Fraunhofer LBF, Darmstadt 64289, Germany
Jonas Presser
Affiliation:
Fraunhofer LBF, Darmstadt 64289, Germany
Katja Utaloff
Affiliation:
Fraunhofer LBF, Darmstadt 64289, Germany
*
a) Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

The media advertizes that soon everybody can manufacture models and parts of all kinds via computer-aided design –computer-aided manufacturing by additive manufacturing (AM) technologies. That can boost the do-it-yourself activities enormously. But it can also revolutionize the industries: Most conventional technologies of manufacture are profitable only in big lots of production. For single specimens and small lots of production, they are too expensive. But with AM, one or a few original or spare parts can be produced at low cost. However, to succeed in the market, the AM products must become competitive. They must have reproducibility of an exact shape, even in tiny details, a perfect surface and, above all, sufficient mechanical strength. This article deals with three-dimensional ink-jet printing with monomer inks and polymer powders. Since powder beds are always porous, the main aim was to fill the pores permanently with high amounts of the ink polymer. A new polymer powder that rapidly dissolves in monomer inks is reported.

Type
Invited Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Kamal, M.R., Isayev, A.I., and Liu, S.: Injection Molding Technology and Fundamentals (Hanser Gardner Publ, Cincinnati, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sridhar, A., Attanasio, D., and Nannini, A.: Trends and expertise exchange within rapid manufacturing in Europe. RTejournal 7, 112 (2010).Google Scholar
Rengier, F., Mehndiratta, A., von Tengg-Kobligk, H., Zechmann, C.M., Unterhinninghofen, R., Kauczor, H-U., and Giesel, F.L.: 3D printing based on imaging data: Review of medical applications. Int. J. Comput. Assist. Radiol. Surg. 5, 335341 (2010).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Khalyfa, A., Vogt, S., Weisser, J., Grimm, G., Rechtenbach, A., Meyer, W., and Schnabelrauch, M.: Development of a new calcium phosphate powder-binder system for the 3D printing of patient specific implants. J. Mater. Sci.: Mater. Med. 18, 909916 (2007).Google ScholarPubMed
Hopkins, N., Hague, R., and Dickens, P.: Rapid Manufacturing: An industrial Revolution for the Digital Age (John Wiley & Sons, West Sussex, 2006).Google Scholar
Yan, X. and Gu, P.: A review of rapid prototyping technologies and systems. Comput.-Aided Des. 28, 307318 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webb, P.A.: A review of rapid prototyping (RP) techniques in the medical and biomedical sector. J. Med. Eng. Technol. 24, 149153 (2000).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sachs, E.M., Haggerty, J.S., Cima, M.J., and Williams, P.A.: Three-dimensional printing techniques. US Patent No. 5204055 (1993).Google Scholar
Bredt, J., Clark, S., Derek, W., and Dicologero, M.: Thermoplastic powder material system for appearance models from 3D printing systems. WO 2004113042 (2004).Google Scholar
Patirupanusara, P., Suwanpreuk, W., Rubkumintara, T., and Suwanprateeb, J.: Effect of binder content on the material properties of polymethyl methacrylate fabricated by three dimensional printing technique. J. Mater. Process Technol. 207, 4045 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lozo, B., Stanic, M., Jamnicki, S., Poljacek, S.J., and Muck, T.: Three-dimensional ink jet prints—impact of infiltrants. J. Imaging Sci. Technol. 52, 51004 (1)-51004(8) (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salmi, M., Paloheimo, K.S., Tuomi, J., Wolff, J., and Mäkitie, A.: Accuracy of medical models made by additive manufacturing (rapid manufacturing). J. Craniomaxillofac. Surg. 41, 603609 (2013).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fromm, J.E.: Numerical calculation of the fluid dynamics of drop-on-demand jets. IBM J. Res. Dev. 28, 322333 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reis, N. and Derby, B.: Ink jet deposition of ceramic suspensions: Modeling and experiments of droplet formation. Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 625, 117 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reis, N., Ainsley, C., and Derby, B.: Ink-jet delivery of particle suspensions by piezoelectric droplet ejectors. J. Appl. Phys. 97, 094903 1-6 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bredereck, H., Föhlisch, B., Franz, R., Grahe, G., Petranyi, P., Posselt, K., Sigel, H., Tag, E., and Wirths, W.: About CH-active polymerisation initiators. XIII. Polymerisations and polymerisation initiators. Die Makromolekulare Chemie 92, 7090 (1966).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hecht, R. and Ludsteck, M.: Initiator system for acid dental formulations, WO 02092023 (2002).Google Scholar
Yuji, I., Yoshinori, K., and Toru, K.: Polymerization initiator composition controlling polymerization at interface and curable composition containing same, EP0480785 (1992).Google Scholar
Brooks, B.W.: Free-radical polymerization: Suspension. In Handbook of Polymer Reaction Engineering, Meyer, Th. and Keurentjes, J., eds.; Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH: Weinheim, Germany, 2008, pp. 213247.Google Scholar
Kalfoglou, N.K. and Chaffey, C.E.: Effects of extrusion on the structure and properties of high-impact polystyrene. Polym. Eng. Sci. 19, 552557 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar