Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T16:43:04.775Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Coating induced residual stress in nonoriented electrical steel laminations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2014

Yaoyao Ding ,
Matthew Gallaugher ,
Nicolas Brodusch ,
Raynald Gauvin  and
Richard R. Chromik
Yaoyao Ding
Affiliation:
McGill University, Department of Mining and Material Engineering, Montreal, Quebec H3A 0C5, Canada
Matthew Gallaugher
Affiliation:
McGill University, Department of Mining and Material Engineering, Montreal, Quebec H3A 0C5, Canada
Nicolas Brodusch
Affiliation:
McGill University, Department of Mining and Material Engineering, Montreal, Quebec H3A 0C5, Canada
Raynald Gauvin
Affiliation:
McGill University, Department of Mining and Material Engineering, Montreal, Quebec H3A 0C5, Canada
Richard R. Chromik*
Affiliation:
McGill University, Department of Mining and Material Engineering, Montreal, Quebec H3A 0C5, Canada
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

To produce the magnetic core of electric motors, nonoriented electrical steels (NOESs) are used with an electrically insulating coating applied to the surface. Residual stress is induced during the coating process, which will alter the hardness and magnetic domain structure of the NOES. In this study, the effect of the coating is examined, specifically, its role in creating a residual stress near the coating/steel interface. This stress was investigated by the nanoindentation technique. With this method, a ∼30 µm deep affected area was observed for NOES along both the rolling and transverse cross section directions, when in the presence of the coating. A biaxial tensile stress of ∼200 MPa was calculated from the measured hardness values in the NOES, which was linked to variations in the magnetic domain structure near the interface. The observed magnetic domain structure was simplified by the reduction of supplemental domain structure near the coating/steel interface.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 29 , Issue 16 , 28 August 2014 , pp. 1737 - 1746
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Oda, Y., Kohno, M., and Honda, A.: Recent development of non-oriented electrical steel sheet for automobile electrical devices. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 320, 2430 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kestens, L., Jonas, J.J., Van Houtte, P., and Aernoudt, E.: Orientation selection during static recrystallization of cross rolled non-oriented electrical steels. Textures Microstruct. 26–27, 321 (1996).Google Scholar
Matsumura, K. and Fukuda, B.: Recent developments of non-oriented electrical steel sheets. IEEE Trans. Magn. 20, 1533 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shimanaka, H., Ito, Y., Matsumura, K., and Fukuda, B.: Recent development of non-oriented electrical steel sheets. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 26, 57 (1984).Google Scholar
Chivavibul, P., Enoki, M., Konda, S., Inada, Y., Tomizawa, T., and Toda, A.: Reduction of core loss in non-oriented (NO) electrical steel by electroless-plated magnetic coating. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 323, 306 (2011).Google Scholar
Beyer, E., Lahn, L., Schepers, C., and Stucky, T.: The influence of compressive stress applied by hard coatings on the power loss of grain oriented electrical steel sheet. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 323, 1985 (2011).Google Scholar
Rygal, R., Moses, A.J., Derebasi, N., Schneider, J., and Schoppa, A.: Influence of cutting stress on magnetic field and flux density distribution in non-oriented electrical steels. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 215–216, 687 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindenmo, M., Coombs, A., and Snell, D.: Advantages, properties and types of coatings on non-oriented electrical steels. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 215–216, 79 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhu, J., Xie, H., Hu, Z., Chen, P., and Zhang, Q.: Cross-sectional residual stresses in thermal spray coatings measured by Moire interferometry and nanoindentation technique. J. Therm. Spray Technol. 21, 810 (2012).Google Scholar
Perera, D.Y.: On adhesion and stress in organic coatings. Prog. Org. Coat. 28, 21 (1996).Google Scholar
Zhang, X.C., Xu, B.S., Wang, H.D., Wu, Y.X., and Jiang, Y.: Underlying mechanisms of the stress generation in surface coatings. Surf. Coat. Technol. 201, 6715 (2007).Google Scholar
Zhang, X.C., Xu, B.S., Wang, H.D., and Wu, Y.X.: An analytical model for predicting thermal residual stresses in multilayer coating systems. Thin Solid Films 488, 274 (2005).Google Scholar
Tsui, Y.C. and Clyne, T.W.: An analytical model for predicting residual stresses in progressively deposited coatings. Part 1: Planar geometry. Thin Solid Films 306, 23 (1997).Google Scholar
Fukuda, B., Satoh, K., Ichida, T., Itoh, Y., and Shimanaka, H.: Effects of surface coatings on domain structure in grain oriented 3% Si-Fe. IEEE Trans. Magn. 17, 2878 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Washko, S.D. and Choby, E.G.: Evidence for the effectiveness of stress coatings in improving the magnetic properties of high permeability 3%Si-Fe. IEEE Trans. Magn. 15, 1586 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frutos, E., Multigner, M., and Gonzalez-Carrasco, J.L.: Novel approaches to determining residual stresses by ultramicroindentation techniques: Application to sandblasted austenitic stainless steel. Acta Mater. 58, 4191 (2010).Google Scholar
He, B.B.: Two-Dimensional X-Ray Diffraction (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, USA, 2009), p. 265.Google Scholar
Luo, Q. and Jones, A.H.: High-precision determination of residual stress of polycrystalline coatings using optimised XRD-sin2ψ technique. Surf. Coat. Technol. 205, 1403 (2010).Google Scholar
Oliver, W.C. and Pharr, G.M.: An improved technique for determining hardness and elastic modulus using load and displacement sensing indentation experiments. J. Mater. Res. 7, 1564 (1992).Google Scholar
Li, T.L., Gao, Y.F., Bei, H., and George, E.P.: Indentation Schmid factor and orientation dependence of nanoindentation pop-in behavior of NiAl single crystals. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 59, 1147 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, Y., Kim, J.Y., Lee, J.S., Kim, K.H., Koo, J.Y., and Kwon, D.: Using the instrumented indentation technique for stress characterization of friction stir-welded API X80 steel. Philos. Mag. 86, 5497 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suresh, S. and Giannakopoulos, A.E.: A new method for estimating residual stresses by instrumented sharp indentation. Acta Mater. 46, 5755 (1998).Google Scholar
Tsui, T.Y., Oliver, W.C., and Pharr, G.M.: Influences of stress on the measurement of mechanical properties using nanoindentation: Part I. Experimental studies in an aluminum alloy. J. Mater. Res. 11, 752 (1996).Google Scholar
Bolshakov, A., Oliver, W.C., and Pharr, G.M.: Influence of stress on the measurement of mechanical properties using nanoindentation: Part II. Finite element simulations. J. Mater. Res. 11, 760 (1996).Google Scholar
Carlsson, S. and Larsson, P.L.: On the determination of residual stress and strain fields by sharp indentation testing: Part II: Experimental investigation. Acta Mater. 49, 2193 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlsson, S. and Larsson, P.L.: On the determination of residual stress and strain fields by sharp indentation testing: Part I: Theoretical and numerical analysis. Acta Mater. 49, 2179 (2001).Google Scholar
Swadener, J.G., Taljat, B., and Pharr, G.M.: Measurement of residual stress by load and depth sensing indentation with spherical indenters. J. Mater. Res. 16, 2091 (2001).Google Scholar
Taylor, C.A., Wayne, M.F., and Chiu, W.K.S.: Residual stress measurement in thin carbon films by Raman spectroscopy and nanoindentation. Thin Solid Films 429, 190 (2003).Google Scholar
Chukwuchekwa, N., Moses, A.J., and Anderson, P.: Study of the effects of surface coating on magnetic Barkhausen noise in grain-oriented electrical steel. IEEE Trans. Magn. 48, 1393 (2012).Google Scholar
Senda, K., Fujita, A., Honda, A., Kuroki, N., and Yagi, M.: Magnetic properties and domain structure of nonoriented electrical steel under stress. Electr. Eng. Jpn. 182, 10 (2013).Google Scholar
Hubert, A. and Schafer, R.: Magnetic Domains: The Analysis of Magnetic Microstructures (Springer, Berlin, Germany, 1998), p. 61.Google Scholar
Newbury, D.E., Joy, D.C., Echlin, P., Fiori, C.E., and Goldstein, J.I.: Advanced Scanning Electron Microscopy and X-ray Microanalysis (Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York, USA, 1986), p. 147.Google Scholar
Gallaugher, M., Chromik, R.R., Brodusch, N., and Gauvin, R.: Magnetic domain structure and crystallographic orientation of electrical steels revealed by a forescatter detector and electron backscatter diffraction. Ultramicroscopy 142, 40 (2014).Google Scholar
Fischer-Cripps, A.C.: Nanoindentation, 3rd ed. (Springer, New York, USA, 2011), p. 31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kestens, L. and Jacobs, S.: Texture control during the manufacturing of nonoriented electrical steels. Texture, Stress Microstruct. 2008, 173083 (2008).Google Scholar
Lee, Y.H. and Kwon, D.: Estimation of biaxial surface stress by instrumented indentation with sharp indenters. Acta Mater. 52, 1555 (2004).Google Scholar
Mann, P.: Evaluation of Surface Modifications Introduced by Shot Peening of Aluminum Alloy 2024-T351 (Master's Thesis, McGill University, Canada, 2014), p. 65.Google Scholar