Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T01:20:20.599Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Characterization and in vitro evaluation of gelatin–chitosan scaffold reinforced with bioceramic nanoparticles for bone tissue engineering

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 May 2019

Kanchan Maji  and
Sudip Dasgupta
Kanchan Maji
Affiliation:
Department of Ceramic Engineering, National Institute of Technology, Rourkela, Odisha 769008, India
Sudip Dasgupta*
Affiliation:
Department of Ceramic Engineering, National Institute of Technology, Rourkela, Odisha 769008, India
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Gelatin–chitosan–based scaffolds using different bioactive nano-ceramic phase such as hydroxyapatite (HAp), beta tri calcium phosphate (β-TCP) and 58 s bioactive glass (58 s BG) were fabricated at a fixed 30 wt% of bioceramic phase content. From FTIR spectrum of the composite scaffold, a red shift in amide I and amide II bonds from 1595 to 1545 cm−1 and a new absorption peak due to electrostatic interaction between Ca2+ and COO− were observed. Average pore size in all the composite scaffolds was in the range between 100 and 300 μm, significantly smaller than the average pore size of pure gelatin–chitosan scaffold. Gelatin–chitosan-58 s BG (GCB30) scaffold exhibited the highest amount of protein absorption of 23 mg/cm2 among all the prepared scaffolds after 36 h of incubation in bovine serum albumin (BSA) solution. Mesenchymal stem cell’s (MSC’s) proliferation onto GCB30 scaffold was significantly higher as compared to other prepared scaffolds up to 7 days of cell culture. Expression of both early marker (RUNX2) and late marker (Osteocalcin) of differentiation was higher in MSCs cultured onto GCB30 scaffold as compared to other prepared scaffolds.

Keywords

biomaterialbonenanostructure
Type
Article
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 34 , Issue 16 , 28 August 2019 , pp. 2807 - 2818
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Wei, G. and Ma, P.X.: Structure and properties of nano-hydroxyapatite/polymer composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials 25, 4749–4757 (2004).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Suchanek, W. and Yoshimura, M.: Processing and properties of hydroxyapatite-based biomaterials for use as hard tissue replacement implants. J. Mater. Res. 13, 94–117 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Groeneveld, E., van den Bergh, J., Holzmann, P., ten Bruggenkate, C., Tuinzing, D., and Burger, E.: Mineralization processes in demineralized bone matrix grafts in human maxillary sinus floor elevations. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 48, 393–402 (1999).3.0.CO;2-C>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meinel, L., Karageorgiou, V., Fajardo, R., Snyder, B., Shinde-Patil, V., Zichner, L., Kaplan, D., Langer, R., and Vunjak-Novakovic, G.: Bone tissue engineering using human mesenchymal stem cells: Effects of scaffold material and medium flow. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 32, 112–122 (2004).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mitragotri, S. and Lahann, J.: Physical approaches to biomaterial design. Nat. Mater. 8, 15–23 (2009).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Williams, D.F.: On the nature of biomaterials. Biomaterials 30, 5897–5909 (2009).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Samavedi, S., Whittington, A.R., and Goldstein, A.S.: Calcium phosphate ceramics in bone tissue engineering: A review of properties and their influence on cell behavior. Acta Biomater. 9, 8037–8045 (2013).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tsuruga, E., Takita, H., Itoh, H., Wakisaka, Y., and Kuboki, Y.: Pore size of porous hydroxyapatite as the cell-substratum controls BMP-induced osteogenesis. J. Biochem. 121, 317–324 (1997).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bielby, R.C., Pryce, R.S., Hench, L.L., and Polak, J.M.: Enhanced derivation of osteogenic cells from murine embryonic stem cells after treatment with ionic dissolution products of 58S bioactive sol–gel glass. Tissue Eng. 11, 479–488 (2005).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rezwan, K., Chen, Q., Blaker, J., and Boccaccini, A.R.: Biodegradable and bioactive porous polymer/inorganic composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials 27, 3413–3431 (2006).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sionkowska, A.: Current research on the blends of natural and synthetic polymers as new biomaterials: Review. Prog. Polym. Sci. 36, 1254–1276 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suh, J.K.F. and Matthew, H.W.: Application of chitosan-based polysaccharide biomaterials in cartilage tissue engineering: A review. Biomaterials 21, 2589–2598 (2000).Google ScholarPubMed
Chandy, T. and Sharma, C.P.: Chitosan-as a biomaterial. Biomater. Artif. Cells Artif. Organs 18, 1–24 (1990).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yin, Y., Ye, F., Cui, J., Zhang, F., Li, X., and Yao, K.: Preparation and characterization of macroporous chitosan–gelatin/β-tricalcium phosphate composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 67, 844–855 (2003).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sharma, C., Dinda, A.K., Potdar, P.D., Chou, C.F., and Mishra, N.C.: Fabrication and characterization of novel nano-biocomposite scaffold of chitosan–gelatin–alginate–hydroxyapatite for bone tissue engineering. Mater. Sci. Eng., C 64, 416–427 (2016).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kim, H-W., Kim, H-E., and Salih, V.: Stimulation of osteoblast responses to biomimetic nanocomposites of gelatin–hydroxyapatite for tissue engineering scaffolds. Biomaterials 26, 5221–5230 (2005).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maji, K., Dasgupta, S., Pramanik, K., and Bissoyi, A.: Preparation and evaluation of gelatin–chitosan–nanobioglass 3D porous scaffold for bone tissue engineering. Int. J. Biomater. 2016, 1–14 (2016).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yazdimamaghani, M., Vashaee, D., Assefa, S., Walker, K.J., Madihally, S.V., Köhler, G.A., and Tayebi, L.: Hybrid macroporous gelatin/bioactive-glass/nanosilver scaffolds with controlled degradation behavior and antimicrobial activity for bone tissue engineering. J. Biomed. Nanotechnol. 10, 911–931 (2014).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peter, M., Binulal, N., Nair, S., Selvamurugan, N., Tamura, H., and Jayakumar, R.: Novel biodegradable chitosan–gelatin/nano-bioactive glass ceramic composite scaffolds for alveolar bone tissue engineering. Chem. Eng. J. 158, 353–361 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mozafari, M., Rabiee, M., Azami, M., and Maleknia, S.: Biomimetic formation of apatite on the surface of porous gelatin/bioactive glass nanocomposite scaffolds. Appl. Surf. Sci. 257, 1740–1749 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agrawal, A., Singh, B., Kashyap, Y., Shukla, M., Sarkar, P., and Sinha, A.: Design, development and first experiments on the X-ray imaging beamline at Indus-2 synchrotron source RRCAT. India. J. Synchrotron Radiat. 22, 1531–1539 (2015).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huang, Y., Onyeri, S., Siewe, M., Moshfeghian, A., and Madihally, S.V.: In vitro characterization of chitosan–gelatin scaffolds for tissue engineering. Biomaterials 26, 1531–1539 (2005).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bissoyi, A. and Pramanik, K.: Role of the apoptosis pathway in cryopreservation-induced cell death in mesenchymal stem cells derived from umbilical cord blood. Biopreserv. Biobanking 12, 246–254 (2014).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marone, M., Mozzetti, S., de Ritis, D., Pierelli, L., and Scambia, G.: Cell cycle regulation in human hematopoietic stem cells: From isolation to activation. Biol. Proced. Online 3, 493–501 (2001).Google Scholar
Raynaud, S., Champion, E., Bernache-Assollant, D., and Thomas, P.: Calcium phosphate apatites with variable Ca/P atomic ratio I. Synthesis, characterisation and thermal stability of powders. Biomaterials 23, 1065–1072 (2002).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maji, K., Dasgupta, S., Kundu, B., and Bissoyi, A.: Development of gelatin–chitosan–hydroxyapatite based bioactive bone scaffold with controlled pore size and mechanical strength. J. Biomater. Sci., Polym. Ed. 26, 1190–1209 (2015).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Toledo, T.V., Bellato, C.R., Souza, C.H., Domingues, J.T., dSilva, C.D., Reis, C., Maurício, P., and Fontes, F.: Preparation and evaluation of magnetic chitosan particles modified with ethylenediamine and Fe(III) for the removal of Cr(VI) from aqueous solutions. Quim. Nova 37, 1610–1617 (2014).Google Scholar
Woo, K.M., Seo, J., Zhang, R., and Ma, P.X.: Suppression of apoptosis by enhanced protein adsorption on polymer/hydroxyapatite composite scaffolds. Biomaterials 28, 2622–2630 (2007).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilson, C.J., Clegg, R.E., Leavesley, D.I., and Pearcy, M.J.: Mediation of biomaterial–cell interactions by adsorbed proteins: A review. Tissue Eng. 11, 1–18 (2005).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maji, K. and Dasgupta, S.: Development of gelatin–chitosan–hydroxyapatite based bioactive bone scaffold with controlled pore size and mechanical strength. Indian Ceram. Soc. 74, 1190–1209 (2015).Google Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Maji and Dasgupta supplementary material

Table S1

Download Maji and Dasgupta supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 130.8 KB