Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T01:11:26.210Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Characteristics of titanium nitride films grown by pulsed laser deposition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

R. Chowdhury ,
R. D. Vispute ,
K. Jagannadham  and
J. Narayan
R. Chowdhury
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695–7916
R. D. Vispute
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695–7916
K. Jagannadham
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695–7916
J. Narayan
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695–7916
Get access

Abstract

Laser physical vapor deposition (LPVD) has been used to grow titanium nitride films on hydrogen-terminated silicon(100) substrates at deposition temperatures ranging from room temperature to 600 °C. A pulsed KrF excimer laser (λ = 248 nm, τ = 25 ns) was used with the deposition chamber maintained at a base pressure of 10−7 Torr prior to deposition. Different properties of the films were investigated by x-ray diffraction, Auger electron spectroscopy, Raman spectroscopy, optical, scanning, and high resolution transmission electron microscopy, and measurement of electrical resistivity. When the substrate temperature was low (at and below 500 °C), oxygen atoms from the residual gases were incorporated in the films. The microstructures and resistivities of TiN films were found to be strongly dependent on the temperature of the silicon substrates. The TiN films deposited at 600 °C were oxygen-free, as observed from Auger analysis, and the room temperature resistivity was found to be 14–15 μΩ-cm. Raman spectroscopy of the films showed that the nitrogen-related optical phonon peak increased with deposition temperature in comparison with the titanium-related acoustic peak. Transmission electron microscopy and x-ray diffraction analyses showed that the films were polycrystalline at low temperature with grain size ranging from 300–600 Å, depending on the temperature of the substrate. At 600 °C, the films were found to be single crystals with occasional presence of dislocation loops. The spacing of Moiré fringes in TiN/Si samples deposited at 600 °C established the nearly periodic elastic strain field extending into the TiN and Si at the interface. Although there exists a large misfit between TiN and Si (24.6%), the epitaxial growth of TiN films on Si(100) substrates was explained by means of domain-matched epitaxy with a 4-to-3 match in unit cells for TiN/Si structure, giving rise to a residual lattice misfit of only 4%.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 11 , Issue 6 , June 1996 , pp. 1458 - 1469
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Vispute, R. D., Narayan, J., and Jagannadham, K., J. Elect. Mat. 25, 151 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Chowdhury, R., Biunno, N., and Narayan, J., Mechanisms of Thin Films Evolution, edited by Yalisove, S. M., Thompson, C. V., and Eaglesham, D. J. (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 317, Pittsburgh, PA, 1993).Google Scholar
3.Chowdhury, R., Chen, X., and Narayan, J., Appl. Phys. Lett. 64, 1236 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Chowdhury, R., Chen, X., Jagannadham, K., and Narayan, J., in Laser Ablation in Materials Processing: Fundamentals and Applications, edited by Braren, B., Dubowski, J.J., and Norton, D. (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 285, Pittsburgh, PA, 1993), p. 501.Google Scholar
5.Narayan, J., Tiwari, P., Chen, X., Singh, J., Chowdhury, R., and Zheleva, T., Appl. Phys. Lett. 61, 1290 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Zheleva, T., Jagannadham, K., and Narayan, J., J. Appl. Phys. 75, 860 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Jagannadham, K., Narayan, J., Chowdury, R., Tsvetanka, Z., and Tiwari, P., J. Electron. Mater. 23, 861 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Fork, D. K., Ponce, F. A., Tramontana, J.C., and Geballe, T. H., Appl. Phys. Lett. 58, 2294 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Dawson, P. T., and Tzatzov, K. K., Surf. Sci. 149, 105 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Sandgren, J. E., Johansson, B. O., and Karlsson, S. E., Surf. Sci. 128, 265 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Gaarenstroom, S., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. 20, 458 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Ohring, M., The Materials Science of Thin Films (Academic Press, Inc., San Diego, CA, 1992), Chap. 5.Google Scholar
13.Spengler, W., Kaiser, R., and Bilz, H., Solid State Commun. 17, 19 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Spengler, W., Kaiser, R., Christensen, A. N., and Muller-Vogt, G., Phys. Rev. B 3, 16 (1978).Google Scholar
15.Jagannadham, K., Chowdhury, R., Biunno, N., and Narayan, J., Mechanisms of Thin Film Evolution, edited by Yalisove, S. M., Thompson, C. V., and Eaglesham, D. J. (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 317, Pittsburgh, PA, 1993).Google Scholar
16.Pollock, D. D., in Electrical Conduction in Solids: An Introduction (American Society for Metals, Metals Park, OH, 1985), Chap. 4.Google Scholar