Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T01:07:13.524Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

What makes a team brilliant? An experiential exploration of positivity within healthcare

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2018

Emeritus Liz Fulop ,
Louise Kippist Open the ORCID record for Louise Kippist [Opens in a new window] ,
Ann Dadich ,
Kate Hayes ,
Leila Karimi  and
Anne Symth
Emeritus Liz Fulop
Affiliation:
Griffith Business School, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia
Louise Kippist*
Affiliation:
School of Business, Western Sydney University, Parramatta, NSW, Australia
Ann Dadich
Affiliation:
School of Business, Western Sydney University, Parramatta, NSW, Australia
Kate Hayes
Affiliation:
Griffith Business School, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia
Leila Karimi
Affiliation:
School of Psychology and Public Health, College of Science, Health and Engineering, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
Anne Symth
Affiliation:
Organisational Consulting, Melbourne, Australia
*
*Corresponding author: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Following its positive outcomes in a state-wide survey, co-managers of the Queensland Cancer Control Analysis Team commissioned discovery interviews to explore these results. Eleven interviews were analysed by positive organisational scholars who drew on depreciating and appreciating organisational dynamics to make sense of Queensland Cancer Control Analysis Team’s high performance. An initial framework was devised, including appreciative, depreciative, and hybrid dynamics, with the latter representing an extension to an existing taxonomy. Findings revealed mainly appreciative and hybrid dynamics. To further understand these, the framework was expanded by reframing the dynamics as positive institutional work. This extension offers an experiential understanding of positive institutional patterns by incorporating the troika of experiential surfacing, agency as inquiry, and inclusion. The value of this framework is threefold, for it can be used as an analytic, a diagnostic, and an intervention tool to enable scholars and practitioners to operationalise positive organisational scholarship to examine, understand, and promote positive organisational experiences.

Keywords

health service managementpositive organisational scholarshipknowledge translationappreciative inquiryorganisational behaviour
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Management & Organization , Volume 25 , Special Issue 4: Neurodiversity , July 2019 , pp. 591 - 612
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and Australian and New Zealand Academy of Management 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bate, P. (2007). Bringing user experience to healthcare improvement: The concepts, methods and practices of experience-based design. Oxon: Radcliffe Publishing.Google Scholar
Block, P. (2017). The empowered manager: Positive political skills at work (2nd ed., Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Bridges, J., Gray, W., Box, G., & Machin, S. (2008). Discovery interviews: A mechanism for user involvement. International Journal of Older People Nursing, 3(3), 206–210.Google Scholar
Bright, D. S. (2009). Appreciative inquiry and positive organizational scholarship. OD Practitioner, 41(3), 2–7.Google Scholar
Bryman, A. (2012). Social research methods (4th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cameron, K., & Lavine, M. (2006). Making the impossible possible: Leading extraordinary performance. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.Google Scholar
Cameron, K. S., & Caza, A. (2004). Contributions to the discipline of positive organizational scholarship. American Behavioral Scientist, 47(6), 731–739.Google Scholar
Cameron, K. S., & Spreitzer, G. M. (2012a). Introduction: What is positive about positive organizational scholarship? In K. S. Cameron, & G. M. Spreitzer (Eds.), Oxford handbook of positive organizational scholarship (pp. 1–14). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cameron, K. S., & Spreitzer, G. M. (Eds.) (2012b). Oxford handbook of positive organizational scholarship. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Carson, L. (2011). Designing a public conversation using the world cafe method. Social Alternatives, 30(1), 10–14.Google Scholar
Collins, H. (2004). Interactional expertise as a third kind of knowledge. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 3, 125–114.Google Scholar
Collins, H., Evans, R., Ribeiro, R., & Hall, M. (2006). Experiments with interactional expertise. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 37, 656–674.Google Scholar
Colquist, S. (2013). Queensland cancer control analysis team: TMDiscovery interviews. Retrieved from https://qccat.health.qld.gov.au/DiscoveryInterviewsGoogle Scholar
Cooperrider, D. L., & Srivastva, S. (1987). Appreciative inquiry in organizational life. Research in Organizational Change and Development, 1, 129–155.Google Scholar
Cooperrider, D. L., & Srivastva, S. (2013). Appreciative inquiry in organizational life. In D. L. Cooperrider, D. P. Zandee, L. N. Godwin, M. Avital, & B. Boland (Eds.), Organizational generativity: The appreciative inquiry summit and a scholarship of transformation, (Vol. 4, pp. 9–67). Bingley: Emerald Group.Google Scholar
DeGraff, J., & Nathan-Roberts, D. (2012). Innovativeness as positive deviance: Identifying and operationalizing the attributes, functions and dynamics that create growth. In K. S. Cameron, & G. M. Spreitzer (Eds.), Oxford handbook of positive organizational scholarship (pp. 703–714). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dutton, J. E., & Heaphy, E. D. (2003). The power of high-quality connections. In K. S. Cameron, J. E. Dutton, & R. E. Quinn (Eds.), Positive organizational scholarship: Foundations of a new discipline, (pp. 263–278). San Francisco: Berrett Koehler.Google Scholar
Eisenhardt, K. M., & Graebner, M. E. (2007). Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 25–32.Google Scholar
Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 350–383.Google Scholar
Fredrickson, B. L. (2003). Positive emotions and upward spirals in organizations. In K. S. Cameron, J. E. Dutton, & R. E. Quinn (Eds.), Positive organizational scholarship: Foundations of a new discipline, (pp. 163–175). San Francisco: Berrett Koehler.Google Scholar
Fredrickson, B. L., & Joiner, T. (2002). Positive emotions trigger upward spirals toward emotional well-being. Psychological Science, 13(2), 172–175.Google Scholar
Gittell, J. H. (2002). Relationships between service providers and their impact on customers. Journal of Service Research, 4(4), 299–310.Google Scholar
Haskell, J., Linds, W., & Ippolito, J. (2002). Opening spaces of possibility: The enactive as a qualitative research approach. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 3(3), Art. 14.Google Scholar
Havens, D. S. (2011). Positive organisational scholarship: Tools for leading with excellence. Nurse Leader, 9(5), 26–30.Google Scholar
Huffman, T. (2013). Pragmatic fieldwork: Qualitative research for creative democracy and social action. Journal of Social Justice, 3, 1–24.Google Scholar
Inglis, A. (2008). Approaches to the validation of quality frameworks for e-learning. Quality Assurance in Education, 16(4), 347–362.Google Scholar
Karp, T. (2004). Learning the steps of the dance of change: Improving change capabilities by integrating future studies and positive organisational scholarship. Foresight, 6(6), 349–355.Google Scholar
Langley, A., Smallman, C., Tsoukas, H., & Van de Ven, A. H. (2013). Process studies of change in organization and management: Unveiling temporality, activity, and flow. Academy of Management Journal, 56(1), 1–13.Google Scholar
Lee, F., Caza, A., Edmondson, A., & Thomke, S. (2003). New knowledge creation in organizations. In K. S. Cameron, J. E. Dutton, & R. E. Quinn (Eds.), Positive organizational scholarship: Foundations of a new discipline (pp. 194–206). San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.Google Scholar
Lee, Y.-H., Yang, C. C., & Chen, T.-T. (2016). Barriers to incident-reporting behavior among nursing staff: A study based on the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Management & Organization, 22(1), 1–18.Google Scholar
Losada, M., & Heaphy, E. (2004). The role of positivity and connectivity in the performance of business teams. American Behavioral Scientist, 47(6), 740–765.Google Scholar
Luthans, F. (2002). The need for and meaning of positive organizational behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23, 695–706.Google Scholar
Luthans, F., & Avolio, B. (2003). Authentic leadership and positive development. In K. S. Cameron, J. E. Dutton, & R. E. Quinn (Eds.), Positive organizational scholarship: Foundations of a new discipline (pp. 241–258). San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.Google Scholar
Moore, G., & Beadle, R. (2006). In search of organizational virtue in business: Agents, goods, practices, institutions and environments. Organization Studies, 27(3), 369–389.Google Scholar
NHS (National Health Service) Modernisation Agency (2003). A guide to using discovery interviews to improve care. Retrieved from Leicester.Google Scholar
Nilsson, W. (2015). Positive institutional work: Exploring institutional work through the lens of positive organizational scholarship. Academy of Management Review, 40(3), 370–398.Google Scholar
Rosenbaum, D., More, E., & Steane, P. (2017). A longitudinal qualitative case study of change in nonprofits: Suggesting a new approach to the management of change. Journal of Management & Organization, 23(1), 74–91.Google Scholar
Schildt, H., & Perkmann, M. (2017). Organizational settlements: Theorizing how organizations respond to institutional complexity. Journal of Management Inquiry, 26(2), 139–145.Google Scholar
Smith, A. E., & Humphreys, M. S. (2006). Evaluation of unsupervised semantic mapping of natural language with Leximancer concept mapping. Behavior Research Methods, 38(2), 262–279.Google Scholar
Smith, W. K., Lewis, M. W., & Tushman, M. L. (2012). Organizational sustainability: Organization design and senior leadership to enable strategic paradox. In K. S. Cameron, & G. M. Spreitzer (Eds.), Oxford handbook of positive organizational scholarship (pp. 798–810). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Spreitzer, G. M., & Cameron, K. S. (2012). A path forward: Assessing progress and exploring core questions for the future of positive organizational scholarship. In K. S. Cameron, & G. M. Spreitzer (Eds.), Oxford handbook of positive organizational scholarship (pp. 1034–1048). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Spreitzer, G. M., & Sonenshein, S. (2003). Positive deviance and extraordinary organizing. In K. Cameron, J. Dutton, & R. Quinn (Eds.), Positive organizational scholarship: Foundations of a new discipline (pp. 207–224). San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.Google Scholar
State of Queensland (2011). Hospital and health boards Act. Retrieved from Brisbane, QLD.Google Scholar
Varela, F. J., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E. (1991). The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Weberg, D., & Davidson, S. (2017). Patient-centered care, evidence, and innovation. In D. Weberg, S. Davidson, T. Porter-O’Grady, & K. Malloch (Eds.), Leadership for evidence-based innovation in nursing and health professions (pp. 111–142). Burlington, MA: World Headquarters.Google Scholar
Youssef, C. M., & Luthans, F. (2007). Positive organizational behavior in the workplace: The impact of hope, optimism, and resilience. Journal of Management, 33(5), 774–800.Google Scholar