Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T06:07:18.035Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Training Performance Raters Through Error-based Experiential Learning

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 September 2015

Shelda Debowski
Shelda Debowski*
Affiliation:
School of Commerce, Murdoch University, South Street, Murdoch WA 6150, Phone: +61 8 9360 6221, Fax: +61 8 9310 5004, Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Human resource managers need to understand issues relating to rater error. There are well-established ways to introduce these concepts to those training in the field. However, they require a substantial period of training to be successful. Their use in a tertiary setting can be severely constrained by time limitations. An alternative approach to these traditional training styles is that of error-based experiential learning. This training strategy immerses students in erroneous experiences that are then explored and used as a learning platform to build models of good practice. The training process used to structure the exercise is described in detail, illustrating the various errors committed by the trainees. Student feedback from the exercise and some likely risks attached to the activity are also discussed.

Keywords

Performance AppraisalTrial and Error LearningExperiential LearningRater Error
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Management & Organization , Volume 7 , Issue 1 , 2001 , pp. 1 - 12
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and Australian and New Zealand Academy of Management 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bernardin, HJ and Pence, EC (1980) ‘Effects of rater training: Creating new response sets and decreasing accuracy’ Journal of Applied Psychology Vol 65 No 1 pp 60–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernardin, HJ and Buckley, MR (1981) ‘Strategies in rater training’ Academy of Management Review Vol 6 No 2 pp 205–212Google Scholar
Bright, B (1996) ‘Reflecting on ‘reflective practice” Studies in the Education of Adults Vol 28 No2 pp 162–18410.1080/02660830.1996.11730638CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, JP (1999) ‘The definition and measurement of performance in the new age’ in Ilgen, DR and Pulakos, ED (eds) The Changing Nature of Performance: Implications for Staffing, Motivation and Development San Francisco: Jossey-BassGoogle Scholar
Cornell, DG and Sheras, PL (1998) ‘Common errors in school crisis response: Learning from our mistakes’ Psychology in the Schools Vol 35 No 3 pp 297–3073.0.CO;2-K>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Day, L and Sharp, R (1993) ‘Teaching by error in outdoor pursuits activities’ Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Leadership Vol 10 No 1 pp 7–10Google Scholar
Debowski, S, Wood, RE and Bandura, A (2001) “The impact of guided exploration and enactive exploration on self-regulatory mechanisms and information acquisition through electronic enquiry” Journal of Applied Psychology (in press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drake, L (1993) ‘The necessity of error’ Journal of College Science Teaching Vol 23 No 2 pp 113–116Google Scholar
Frese, M and Altmann, A (1989) ‘The treatment of errors in learning and training’ in Bainbridge, L and Ruiz Quintanill, SA (eds) Developing Skills in Information Technology New York: WileyGoogle Scholar
Frese, M, Brodbeck, F, Heinboke, T, Mooser, C, Schleiffenbaum, E and Thiemann, P (1991) ‘Errors in training computer skills: on the positive function of errors’ Human-Computer Interaction Vol 6 No 1 pp 77–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hauenstein, NMA (1998) ‘Training raters to increase the accuracy of appraisals and the usefulness of feedback’ in Smither, JW (ed) Performance Appraisal: State of the Art in Practice San Francisco: Jossey-BassGoogle Scholar
Hauenstein, NMA and Foti, RJ (1989) ‘From laboratory to practice: Neglected issues in implementing frame of reference training’ Personnel Psychology Vol 42 No 2 pp 359–37810.1111/j.1744-6570.1989.tb00663.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holt, SL (1997) ‘Responding to grammar errors’ New Directions for Teaching and Learning Vol 70 No 1 pp 69–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ilgen, DR and Pulakos, ED (1999) ‘Employee performance in today's organizations’ in Ilgen, DR and Pulakos, ED (eds) The Changing Nature of Performance: Implications for Staffing, Motivation and Development San Francisco: Jossey-BassGoogle Scholar
Kozlowski, SWJ, Chao, GT and Morrison, RF (1998) ‘Games raters play: politics, strategies and impression management in performance appraisal’ in Smither, JW (ed) Performance Appraisal: State of the Art in Practice San Francisco: Jossey-BassGoogle Scholar
Latham, GP and Wexley, KN (1994) Increasing Productivity Through Performance Appraisal Reading: Addison Wesley LongmanGoogle Scholar
Lyons, J (1999) ‘Reflective education for professional practice: Discovering knowledge from experience’ Nurse Education Today Vol 19 No 1 pp 29–3410.1054/nedt.1999.0607CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Murphy, KR and Cleveland, JN (1995) Understanding Performance Appraisal: Social, Organizational and Goal-based Perspectives Thousand Oaks: Sage PublicationsGoogle Scholar
Neumann, LJ and Ignacio, EN (1998) ‘Trial and error as a learning strategy in system use’ Proceedings of the ASIS Annual Meeting Vol 35 pp 243–252Google Scholar
Odlin, T (1996) ‘On the recognition of transfer errors' Language Awareness Vol 5 No 3–4 pp 166–17810.1080/09658416.1996.9959905CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ohlsson, S (1996) ‘Learning from performance errors’ Psychological Review Vol 103 No 2 pp 241–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, GE (1998) ‘Perspectives on enduring and emerging issues in performance appraisal’ Public Personnel Management Vol 27 No 3 pp 301–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smither, JW (1998) Performance Appraisal: State of the Art in Practice San Francisco: Jossey-BassGoogle Scholar
Taylor, S, Masterson, SS, Renard, MK and Tracy, KB (1998) ‘Managers' reactions to procedurally just performance management systems’ Academy of Management Journal Vol 41 No 5 pp 568–579Google Scholar
Usher, RBryant, I and Johnston, R (1997) Adult Education and the Post-modern Challenge: Learning Beyond the Limits Florence: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
Whitelegg, J and Clark, G (1998) ‘Maximising the benefits of work-based learning: The effectiveness of environmental audits’ Journal of Geography in Higher Education Vol 22 No 3 pp 325–334Google Scholar
Woehr, DJ and Huffcutt, AI (1994) ‘Rater training for performance appraisal: A quantitative review’ Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology Vol 67 No 3 pp 189–20510.1111/j.2044-8325.1994.tb00562.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar