Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T01:51:53.888Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Teaching research methods: Introducing a psychogeographical approach

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 March 2019

Clare Hindley Open the ORCID record for Clare Hindley [Opens in a new window] ,
Deborah Knowles  and
Damian Ruth
Clare Hindley*
Affiliation:
IUBH International University of Applied Sciences, Mülheimer Straße 38, 53604 Bad Honnef, Germany
Deborah Knowles
Affiliation:
Westminster Business School, University of Westminster, 35 Marylebone Road, London NW1 5LS, UK
Damian Ruth
Affiliation:
Massey University, Massey University Manawatu, Palmerston North 4442, New Zealand
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper explores teaching business students research methods using a psychogeographical approach, specifically the technique of dérive. It responds to calls for new ways of teaching in higher education and addresses the dearth of literature on teaching undergraduate business students qualitative research methods. Psychogeography challenges the dominance of questionnaires and interviews, introduces students to data variety, problematizes notions of success and illuminates the importance of observation and location. Using two studies with undergraduate students, the authors emphasize place and setting, the perception of purpose, the choice of data, criteria of success and the value of guided reflection and self-reflection in students’ learning. Additionally the data reflect on the way students perceive research about management and the nature of management itself. The paper concludes that the deployment of psychogeography to teach business research methods although complex and fraught with difficulty is nevertheless viable, educationally productive and worthy of further research.

Keywords

dérivehigher educationpsychogeographyfieldworkqualitative research methods
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Management & Organization , Volume 28 , Issue 6 , November 2022 , pp. 1321 - 1333
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and Australian and New Zealand Academy of Management 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Albert, M., & Couture, M. (2014). To explore new avenues: Experiential testimonio research. New Qualitative Research Methodologies, 52(4), 794–812.Google Scholar
Alvesson, M., & Gabriel, Y. (2013). Beyond formulaic research: In praise of greater diversity in organizational research and publications. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 12(2), 245–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bassett, K. (2004). Walking as an aesthetic practice and a critical tool: Some psychogeographic experiments. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 28(3), 397–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauman, Z. (2006) Liquid life. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Bowden, J. & Marton, F. (1998). The University of Learning: Beyond Quality and Competence in Higher Education. London: Kogan Page.Google Scholar
Brew, A. (2010). Imperatives and challenges in integrating teaching and research. Higher Education Research & Development, 29(2), 139–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brew, A. (2012). Teaching and research: New relationships and their implications for inquiry-based teaching and learning in higher education. Higher Education Research and Development, 31(1), 101–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bridger, A. J. (2013). Psychogeography and feminist methodology. Feminism & Psychology, 23(3), 285–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buckley, C.A. (2011). Student and staff perceptions of the research-teaching nexus. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 48(3), 313–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, R. (2011). Mixed methods in business and management: A call to the ‘first generation’. Journal of Management and Organization, 17(2), 245–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cassell, C., Bishop, V., Symon, G., Johnson, P., & Buehring, A. (2009). Learning to be a qualitative management researcher. Management Learning, 40(5), 515–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colby, A., Ehrlich, T., Sullivan, W. M., & Dolle, J. R. (2011). Rethinking Undergraduate Business Education: Liberal Learning for the Profession. A Report by the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Coverley, M. (2010). Psychogeography. Harpenden: Pocket Essentials.Google Scholar
Cuthbert, D., Arunachalam, D., & Licina, D. (2012). ‘It feels more important than other classes I have done’: An ‘authentic’ undergraduate research experience in sociology. Studies in Higher Education, 37(2), 129–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Debord, G. (1955) Introduction to a Critique of Urban Geography. Retrieved from http://www.bopsecrets.org/SI/urbgeog.htm.Google Scholar
Debord, G. (1958). Report on the Construction of Situations and on the International Situationist Tendency's Conditions of Organization and Action. Revolution and Counterrevolution in Modern Culture. Retrieved from http://www.Bopsecrety.org/SI/report.html.Google Scholar
Easterby-Smith, M., Thorpe, R., & Jackson, P. R. (2018). Management and business research (6th ed.) London: Sage.Google Scholar
Garrett, B. (2014). Underground London: Adventures in the Secret City Beneath our Feet. The Guardian. Retrieved from http://www.theguardian.com/cities/2014/nov/11/-sp-underground-london-secret-city-ghost-tube-stations#comments.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Guercini, S. (2014). New qualitative research methodologies in management. Management Decision, 52(4), 662–674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gummesson, E. (2006). Qualitative research in management: Addressing complexity, context and persona. Management Decision, 44(2), 167–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ingold, T. (2013). Making: Anthropology, archaeology, art and architecture. Abingdon: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenks, C., & Neves, T. (2000). A walk on the wild side: Urban ethnography meets the Flâneur. Cultural Values 4(1), 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keegan, S. (2009). Emergent inquiry. Qualitative Market Research, 12(2), 234–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knowles, D. (2008). The Strolling Study: Psychogeography for Organisational Researchers. Paper presented at the annual conference of the British Academy of Management, Harrogate, September 9–11.Google Scholar
Knowles, D. (2009). Claiming the streets: Feminist implications of psychogeography as a business research method. The Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 7(1), 47–54. Retrieved from http://www.ejbrm.com/vol7/v7-i1/v7-i1-art5.Google Scholar
Knowles, J. G., & Cole, A. L. (2008). Arts Informed Research. In Knowles, J.G. and Cole, A. L. (Eds.) Handbook of the Arts in Qualitative Research (pp. 55–70). London: SAGE.Google Scholar
Levin, C. (1996). Jean Baudrillard: A study in cultural metaphysics. Europe: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1945, 2002). Phenomenology of perception. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Murray, S. O., & Mauss, M. (1934). Interview with Marcel Mauss. American Ethnologist, 16(1), 163–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicholson, G. (2011). The lost art of walking. Chelmsford: Harbour.Google Scholar
Plant, S. (1992). The most radical gesture: The situationist international in a postmodern age. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Raulet-Croset, N., & Borzeix, A. (2014). Researching spatial practices through commentated walks: ‘On the move’ and ‘Walking with’. Journal of Organizational Ethnography, 3(1), 27–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rice, L. (2009). Playful learning. Journal for Education in the Built Environment, 4(2), 94–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rich, M., & Brown, A. (2012). Combining formal and informal learning for undergraduate management students based in London. In Van Den Bossche, P., Gijselaers, W. & Milter, Richard G. (Eds.), Learning at the crossroads of theory and practice (advances in business education and training, 4.) (pp. 23–36). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, T. (2015). Walking inside out: Contemporary British psychogeography. England, London: Rowman and Littlefield International.Google Scholar
Sharanya, M. (2016). Walking the walled City. Gender and Dérive as Urban Ethnograühy. Etnolska Tribun, 39(46), 198–212.Google Scholar
Shulman, L. S. (2011). Foreword. In Colby, A., Ehrlich, T., Sullivan, W. M., Dolle, J. R., and Shulman, L. S. (Eds.), Rethinking Undergraduate Business Education: Liberal Learning for the Profession (pp i-xviii). San Fransisco: Jossey-Bass & the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.Google Scholar
Sinclair, I. (1998). Bulls & bears & mithraic misalignments: Weather in the City. Lights Out for the territory. (pp. 88–129). London: Granta.Google Scholar
Sinclair, I. (2002). London orbital. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Sinha, A. (2012). The learning continuum: Formal and informal learning experiences – enabling learning and creation of new knowledge in an organization. International Journal of Advanced Corporate Learning, 5(2), 10–14. Retrieved from http://www.editlib.org/p/45557/.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, P. (2014). On walking … and stalking Sebald. Axminster, Devon: Triarchy Press.Google Scholar
Tate Gallery (2018) Situationist International, Retrieved from https://www.tate.org.uk/art/art-terms/s/situationist-international (Retrieved 2/11/2018).Google Scholar
Van Maanen, J. (1996) Commentary: On the matter of voice. Journal of Management Inquiry, 5(4), 375–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Maanen, J. (1998) Qualitative studies of organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Visser-Wijnveen, G. J., Van Driela, J. H., Van der Rijsta, R. M., Verloopa, N., & Visser, A. (2010). The ideal research-teaching nexus in the eyes of academics: Building profiles. Higher Education Research & Development, 29(2), 195–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zussman, R. (2004). People in places. Qualitative Sociology 27(4), 351–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar