Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T11:26:10.174Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The role of team reflexivity as a mediator between project management skills, task familiarity, procedural justice, and product performance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2017

Wann-Yih Wu ,
Adriana Amaya Rivas  and
Yen-Chun Chen
Wann-Yih Wu
Affiliation:
Department of Business Administration, Nanhua University, Chiayi, Taiwan
Adriana Amaya Rivas*
Affiliation:
Escuela Superior Politécnica del Litoral, ESPOL, ESPAE Graduate School of Management, Guayaquil, Ecuador
Yen-Chun Chen
Affiliation:
Department of International Business Administration, Chinese Culture University, Taipei, Taiwan
*
Corresponding author: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Even though the importance of team reflexivity in new product development (NPD) has been well noted in the literature, little attention has been paid to its determinants. Based on the resource-based view, this study proposes that project management skills, task familiarity, and procedural justice are useful to improve team reflexivity. As such, this study also examines the influences that these antecedents and team reflexivity have on NPD. A research framework is proposed along with 10 major hypotheses. To test these, data were collected from 186 team members from NPD teams in Taiwanese high-tech firms, and the partial least square results of confirm that all three of the proposed antecedents have direct impacts on team reflexivity and NPD performance. Task familiarity had the highest mediation effect on the influence of project management skills on NPD performance, followed by team reflexivity and procedural justice. Since previous studies largely ignored the effects of antecedents on team reflexivity and NPD performance, this study provides useful insights for both academics and practitioners.

Keywords

procedural justiceproject management skillsproduct performancetask familiarityteam reflexivity
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Management & Organization , Volume 25 , Issue 6 , November 2019 , pp. 876 - 895
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and Australian and New Zealand Academy of Management 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, S. J., Roch, S. G., & Ayman, R. (2005). Communication medium and member familiarity the effects on decision time, accuracy, and satisfaction. Small Group Research, 36(3), 321–353.Google Scholar
Akgün, A. E., Keskin, H., & Byrne, J. C. (2010). Procedural justice climate in new product development teams: Antecedents and consequences. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 27(7), 1096–1111.Google Scholar
Akgün, A. E., Lynn, G. S., & Yilmaz, C. (2006). Learning process in new product development teams and effects on product success: A socio cognitive perspective. Industrial Marketing Management, 35, 210–224.Google Scholar
Alavi, M., & Leidner, D. E. (2001). Review: Knowledge management and knowledge management systems: Conceptual foundations and research issues. MIS Quarterly, 25(1), 107–136.Google Scholar
Alegre, J., & Chiva, R. (2008). Assessing the impact of organizational learning capability on product innovation performance: An empirical test. Technovation, 28(6), 315–326.Google Scholar
Anderson, R. C., & Reeb, D. M. (2004). Board composition: Balancing family influence in S&P 500 firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 49(2), 209–237.Google Scholar
Argyris, C. (1992). On organizational learning. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120.Google Scholar
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182.Google Scholar
Brockman, B. K., & Morgan, R. M. (2006). The moderating effect of organizational cohesiveness in knowledge use and new product development. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34(3), 295–307.Google Scholar
Calder, B. J., Phillips, L. W., & Tybout, A. M. (1981). Designing research for application. Journal of Consumer Research, 89(2), 197–207.Google Scholar
Carter, S. M., & West, M. A. (1998). Reflexivity, effectiveness and mental health in BBC-TV production teams. Small Group Research, 29(5), 583–601.Google Scholar
Chen, N. C. (2011). Political economy of cross-strait investment: The Taiwanese high-tech industry as an example. Seoul Journal of Economics, 24(2), 171–195.Google Scholar
Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. Modern Methods for Business Research, 295(2), 295–336.Google Scholar
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillside, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Colquitt, J. A., Conlon, D. E., Wesson, M. J., Porter, C. O., & Ng, K. Y. (2001). Justice at the millennium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 425–445.Google Scholar
Colquitt, J. A., LePine, J. A., Piccolo, R. F., Zapata, C. P., & Rich, B. L. (2012). Explaining the justice–performance relationship: Trust as exchange deepener or trust as uncertainty reducer? Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(1), 1–15.Google Scholar
Cooper, R. G., & Kleinschmidt, E. J. (1987). New products: What separates winners from losers? Journal of Product Innovation Management, 4(3), 169–184.Google Scholar
Cropanzano, R., & Greenberg, J. (1997). Progress in organizational justice: Tunneling through the maze. International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 12, 317–372.Google Scholar
Davies, J., & Fortney, M. (2012). The Menton theory of engagement and boredom. 1st Annual Conference on Advances in Cognitive Systems, Palo Alto, CA. (December 6–8, 2012) (http://www.cogsys.org/2012).Google Scholar
Day, G. S., & Wensley, R. (1988). Assessing advantage: A framework for diagnosing competitive superiority. Journal of Marketing, 52(2), 1–20.Google Scholar
Dayan, M., & Basarir, A. (2009). Antecedents and consequences of team reflexivity in new product development projects. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 25(1), 18–29.Google Scholar
De Brentani, U., & Reid, S. E. (2012). The fuzzy front‐end of discontinuous innovation: Insights for research and management. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 29(1), 70–87.Google Scholar
Ellis, S., Carette, B., Anseel, F., & Lievens, F. (2014). Systematic reflection implications for learning from failures and successes. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23(1), 67–72.Google Scholar
Emerson, R. (1976). Social exchange theory. Annual Review of Sociology, 2(1), 335–362.Google Scholar
Ernst, H., Hoyer, W., Kraft, M., & Krieger, K. (2011). Customer relationship management and company performance—The mediating role of new product performance. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39(2), 290–306.Google Scholar
Espinosa, A., Kraut, R., Slaughter, S., Lerch, J., Herbsleb, J., & Mockus, A. (2002). Shared mental models, familiarity, and coordination: A multi-method study of distributed software teams. 23rd International Conference on Information Systems.Google Scholar
Espinosa, J. A., Slaughter, S. A., Kraut, R. E., & Herbsleb, J. D. (2007). Familiarity, complexity, and team performance in geographically distributes software development. Organization Science, 18(4), 613–630.Google Scholar
Faraj, S., & Xiao, Y. (2006). Coordination in fast-response organizations. Management Science, 52(8), 1155–1169.Google Scholar
Folger, R., & Cropanzano, R. (2001). Fairness theory: Justice as accountability. Advances in Organizational Justice, 1, 1–55.Google Scholar
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50.Google Scholar
Gale, W., Church, K. W., & Yarowsky, D. (1992). A method for disambiguating word senses in a large corpus. Computers and the Humanities, 26(5), 415–439.Google Scholar
Gladstein, D. L. (1984). Groups in context: A model of task effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29(4), 499–517.Google Scholar
Goodman, P. S., & Garber, S. (1988). Absenteeism and accidents in a dangerous environment: Empirical analysis of underground coal mines’. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73(1), 81–86.Google Scholar
Greenberg, J. (1987). Reactions to procedural injustice in payment distributions: Do the means justify the ends? Journal of Applied Psychology, 72(1), 55–61.Google Scholar
Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2012). An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in marketing research. Journal of Academy Marketing Science, 40(3), 414–433.Google Scholar
Haon, C., Gotteland, D., & Fornerino, M. (2009). Familiarity and competence diversity in new product development teams: Effects on new product performance. Marketing Letters, 20(1), 75–89.Google Scholar
Harrison, D. A., Mohammed, S., McGrath, J. E., Florey, A. T., & Vanderstoep, S. (2003). Time matters in team task performance: Effects of member familiarity, entrainment, and task discontinuity on speed and quality. Personnel Psychology, 56(3), 633–666.Google Scholar
Hoegl, M., & Parboteeah, K. P. (2006). Team reflexivity in innovative projects. R&D Management, 36(2), 113–125.Google Scholar
Im, S., & Workman, J. P. Jr. (2004). Market orientation, creativity, and new product performance in high-technology firms. Journal of Marketing, 68(2), 114–132.Google Scholar
Johnson, J. H., Arya, B., & Mirchandani, D. A. (2013). Global integration strategies of small and medium multinationals: Evidence from Taiwan. Journal of World Business, 48(1), 47–57.Google Scholar
Kim, J., & Wilemon, D. (2003). Sources and assessment of complexity in NPD projects. R&D Management, 33(1), 15–30.Google Scholar
Konradt, U., Schippers, M., Garbers, Y., & Steenfatt, C. (2015). Effects of guided reflexivity and team feedback on team performance improvement: The role of team regulatory processes and cognitive emergent states. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 24(5), 777–795.Google Scholar
Konovsky, M. A., & Pugh, S. D. (1994). Citizenship behaviour and social exchange. Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 656–669.Google Scholar
Laughlin, P. R., Zander, M. L., Knievel, E. M., & Tan, T. K. (2003). Groups perform better than the best individuals on letters-to-numbers problems: Informative equations and effective strategies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(4), 684–694.Google Scholar
Lawler, E. E., & Worley, C. G. (2006). Built to change. How to achieve sustained organizational effectiveness. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Lee, L. Y. (2013). The antecedents and mediators of new product development success. International Conference and Industrial Management, Phuket, Thailand.Google Scholar
Lee, L. Y., & Sukoco, B. M. (2011). Risk-taking as a moderator of the effect of team reflexivity on product innovation: An empirical study. International Journal of Management, 28(4), 263–275.Google Scholar
Lewis, K., Lange, D., & Gillis, L. (2005). Transactive memory systems, learning and learning transfer. Organization Science, 16(6), 581–598.Google Scholar
Li, H. Y., Bingham, J. B., & Umphress, E. E. (2007). Fairness from the top: Perceived procedural justice and collaborative problem solving in new product development. Organization Science, 18(2), 200–216.Google Scholar
Lim, B., & Klein, K. (2006). Team mental models and team performance: A field study of the effects of team mental model similarity and accuracy. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27(4), 403–418.Google Scholar
Littlepage, G., Robison, W., & Reddington, K. (1997). Effects of task experience and group experience on group performance, member ability, and recognition of expertise. Organization Behavioral Human Decision Processes, 69(2), 133–147.Google Scholar
Luca, L. M., & Atuahene-Gima, K. (2007). Market knowledge dimensions and cross-functional collaboration: Examining the different routes to product innovation performance. Journal of Marketing, 71(1), 95–112.Google Scholar
Luo, Y. (2008). Procedural fairness and interfirm cooperation in strategic alliances. Strategic Management Journal, 29(1), 27–46.Google Scholar
MacCurtain, S., Flood, P. C., Ramamoorthy, N., West, M. A., & Dawson, J. F. (2010). The top management team, reflexivity, knowledge sharing and new product performance: A study of the Irish software industry. Creativity and Innovation Management, 19(3), 219–232.Google Scholar
Macklem, G. L. (2015). Theory: What Is Causing Our Students to Tune Out and Turn Off? In Boredom in the classroom (pp. 27--34). Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar
Marcoulides, G. A., & Saunders, C. (2006). PLS: A silver bullet? MIS Quarterly, 30(2), 3–9.Google Scholar
Mathieu, J. E., Heffner, T. S., Goodwin, G. F., Salas, E., & Cannon-Bowers, J. A. (2000). The influence of shared mental models on team process and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(2), 273–283.Google Scholar
McClough, A. C., & Rogelberg, S. G. (2003). Selection in teams: An exploration of the teamwork knowledge, skills, and ability test. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 11(1), 56–66.Google Scholar
McDonough, E. F. (2000). Investigation of factors contributing to the success of cross‐functional teams. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 17(3), 221–235.Google Scholar
Moorman, C., & Miner, A. S. (1997). The impact of organizational memory on new product performance and creativity. Journal of Marketing Research, 34(1), 91–106.Google Scholar
Morgan, R. M., & Hunt, S. D. (1994). The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing. Journal of Marketing, 58(3), 20–38.Google Scholar
Neill, S., McKee, D., & Rose, G. M. (2007). Developing the organization’s sensemaking capability: Precursor to an adaptive strategic marketing response. Industrial Marketing Management, 36(6), 731–744.Google Scholar
Pant, I., & Baroudi, B. (2008). Project management education: The human skills imperative. International Journal of Project Management, 26(2), 124–128.Google Scholar
Paulus, P. B., & Yang, H. C. (2000). Idea generation in groups: A basis for creativity in organizations. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82(1), 76–87.Google Scholar
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method bias in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903.Google Scholar
Ramamoorthy, N., Flood, P. C., Slattery, T., & Sardessai, R. (2005). Determinants of innovative work behaviour: Development and test of an integrated model. Creativity and Innovation Management, 14(2), 142–150.Google Scholar
Reimann, M., Schilke, O., & Thomas, J. S. (2010). Customer relationship management and firm performance: The mediating role of business strategy. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 38(3), 326–346.Google Scholar
Ringle, C. M., Wende, S., & Will, A. (2005). SmartPLS 2.0 (M3) beta. Retrieved October 5, 2015, from http://www.smartpls.de.Google Scholar
Rogelberg, S. G., Barnes-Farrell, J. L., & Lowe, C. A. (1992). The stepladder technique: An alternative group structure facilitating effective group decision making. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77(5), 730–737.Google Scholar
Schepers, P., & van den Berg, P. T. (2007). Social factors of work-environment creativity. Journal of Business and Psychology, 21(3), 407–428.Google Scholar
Schippers, M. C., Den Hartog, D. N., Koopman, P. L., & van Knippenberg, D. (2008). The role of transformational leadership in enhancing team reflexivity. Human Relations, 61(11), 1593–1616.Google Scholar
Schippers, M. C., Den Hartog, D. N., Koopman, P. L., & Wienk, J. A. (2003). Diversity and team outcomes: The moderating effects of outcome interdependence and group longevity and the mediating effect of reflexivity. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24(6), 779–802.Google Scholar
Schippers, M. C., Edmondson, A. C., & West, M. A. (2014). Team reflexivity as an antidote to team information-processing failures. Small Group Research, 45(6), 731–769.Google Scholar
Schippers, M. C., Homan, A. C., & van Knippenberg, D. (2013). To reflect or not to reflect: Prior team performance as a boundary condition of the effects of reflexivity on learning and final team performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34(1), 6–23.Google Scholar
Schippers, M. C., West, M. A., & Dawson, J. F. (2015). Team reflexivity and innovation: The moderating role of team context. Journal of Management, 41(3), 769–788.Google Scholar
Slaughter, S. A., Ang, S. & Fong Boh, W. (2007). Firm-specific human capital and compensation organizational tenure profiles: An archival analysis of salary data for it. Human Resource Management, 46(3), 373–394.Google Scholar
Sobel, M. E. (1982). Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. Sociological Methodology, 13, 290–312.Google Scholar
Soderquist, K. E., & Kostopoulos, K. (2012). Factors affecting the performance of new product development teams: Some European evidence. In D. G. Assimakopoulos, E. G. Carayannis & R. Dossani (Eds.), Knowledge perspectives of new product development (pp. 29–48). New York, NJ: Springer.Google Scholar
Sosik, J. J., Surinder, S. K., & Piovoso, M. J. (2009). Silver bullet or voodoo statistics? A primer for using partial least squares data analytic techniques in group and organization research. Group & Organization Management, 34(1), 5–36.Google Scholar
Stasser, G., Vaughan, S. I., & Stewart, D. D. (2000). Pooling unshared information: The benefits of knowing how access to information is distributed among group members. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82(1), 82–102.Google Scholar
Stevens, M. J., & Campion, M. A. (1994). The knowledge, skill, and ability requirements for teamwork: Implication for human resource management. Journal of Management, 20(2), 503–530.Google Scholar
Streicher, B., Jonas, E., Maier, G. W., Frey, D., & Spiebberger, A. (2012). Procedural fairness and innovation: Does voice promote people’s creative vein? Creativity Research Journal, 24(4), 358–363.Google Scholar
Subramaniam, M., & Youndt, M. A. (2005). The influence of intellectual capital on the types of innovative capabilities. Academy of Management Journal, 48(3), 450–463.Google Scholar
Templeton, G. F., Lewis, B. R., & Snyder, C. A. (2002). Development of a measure for the organizational learning construct. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(2), 175–218.Google Scholar
Teo, H. H., Wei, K. K., & Benbasat, I. (2003). Predicting intention to adopt interorganizational linkages: An institutional perspective. MIS Quarterly, 27(1), 19–49.Google Scholar
Tjosvold, D. (1991). Leading the team organization: How to create an enduring competitive advantage. New York: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Tjosvold, D., Tang, M. M., & West, M. A. (2004). Reflexivity for team innovation in China. Group and Organization Management, 29(5), 540–559.Google Scholar
Vinzi, V. E., Trinchera, L., & Amato, S. (2010). PLS path modeling: From foundations to recent developments and open issues for model assessment and improvement. In V. Esposito Vinzi, W. W. Chin, J. Henseler, & H. Wang (Eds.), Handbook of partial least squares: Concepts, methods and application (pp. 47–82). Germany: Springer.Google Scholar
West, M. A. (1996). Reflexivity and work group effectiveness: A conceptual integration. In M. A. West (Ed.), Handbook of work group psychology (pp. 555–579). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
West, M. A. (2000). Reflexivity, revolution, and innovation in work teams. In M. M. Beyerlein, D. A. Johnson, & S. T. Beyerlein (Eds.), Product development teams (Vol. 5, pp. 1–29). Stamford, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
West, M. A., & Markiewicz, L. (2004). Building team-based working. A practical guide to organizational transformation. Oxford: Blackwell/British Psychological Society.Google Scholar
Widmer, P. S., Schippers, M. C., & West, M. A. (2009). Recent developments in reflexivity research: A review. Psychology of Everyday Activity, 2(2), 2–11.Google Scholar