Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-12T21:34:18.126Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Rethinking femininity in organisations: Experimental insights into team composition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 September 2018

Ronald Busse Open the ORCID record for Ronald Busse [Opens in a new window]
Ronald Busse*
Affiliation:
FOM University of Applied Sciences, Essen, Germany
*
*Corresponding author: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Role incongruity, sex role stereotypes and candidate selection procedures which oversatisfy masculine role expectations evoke an underrepresentation of femininity in organisations. The author seeks to remedy this bad state of affairs. This study is designed based on an experiment with 288 young executives simulating self-organised work groups and manipulated the degree of gender-related (not sex-related) heterogeneity. Results generally show a curvilinear relationship with an upright U-shaped format between heterogeneity and performance, team identity and intrateam communication. The major contribution in specific is that highly homogeneous teams outperform other team types in the short run, whereas highly heterogeneous teams succeed in the long run. Consequently, this work recommends ‘femininity enrichment’ in firms and discusses manageable practical advice to do so. As for the laboratory character, findings and implications for practicing managers have to be treated with caution. Finally, the most promising avenues for further research are illuminated.

Keywords

experimentfemininityglass ceilingrole incongruityteam composition
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Management & Organization , Volume 26 , Issue 5 , September 2020 , pp. 866 - 879
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and Australian and New Zealand Academy of Management 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abele, A. E. (2003). The dynamics of masculine-agentic and feminine-communal traits: Findings from a prospective study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 85(4), 768–776.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Acker, J. (1990). Hierarchies, jobs, bodies: A theory of gendered organizations. Gender & Society 4(2), 139–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adams, R. B., & Funk, P. (2012). Beyond the glass ceiling: does gender matter? Management Science 58(2), 219–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexander, G. M., Wilcox, T., & Woods, R. (2009). Sex differences in infants’ visual interest in toys. Archives of Sexual Behavior 38(3), 427–433.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. New York: Free Press; Collier Macmillan.Google Scholar
Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1994). Shatter the glass ceiling: Women may make better managers. Human Resource Management 33(4), 549–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bem, S. L. (1977). On the utility of alternative procedures for assessing psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 45(2), 196–205.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berger, J., & Nieken, P. (2014). Heterogeneous contestants and the intensity of tournaments an empirical investigation. Journal of Sports Economics 17(7), 1527002514538639.Google Scholar
Berkery, E., Tiernan, S., & Morley, M. (2013). Inclusive or exclusive: An examination of sex role stereotypes and requisite managerial characteristics among Irish business studies students. Irish Journal of Management 33(1), 7–26.Google Scholar
Brenner, O. C., Tomkiewicz, J., & Schein, V. E. (1989). The relationship between sex role stereotypes and requisite management characteristics revisited. Academy of Management Journal 32(3), 662–669.Google Scholar
Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership New York. NY: Harper and Row Publishers.Google Scholar
Chapman, J. B. (1975). Comparison of male and female leadership styles. Academy of Management Journal 18(3), 645–650.Google Scholar
Chin, L. G. (2016). Unequal egalitarianism: Does organizational structure create different perceptions of male versus female leadership abilities? Gender in Management: An International Journal 31(1), 19–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chodorow, N. J. (1999). The reproduction of mothering: Psychoanalysis and the sociology of gender. San Francisco: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Davidson, C. R., Payne, K. E., Maltz, S., & Rabow, J. (2015). The cost and effect of gendering in the family. Sociology Mind 5(4), 227–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donnelly, K., & Twenge, J. M. (2017). Masculine and feminine traits on the Bem sex-role inventory, 1993–2012: A cross-temporal meta-analysis. Sex Roles 76(9-10), 556–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eagly, A. H. (2004). Few women at the top: How role incongruity produces prejudice and the glass ceiling. Identity, Leadership, and Power, 79–93.Google Scholar
Eagly, A. H., & Carli, L. L. (2003). The female leadership advantage: An evaluation of the evidence. The Leadership Quarterly 14(6), 807–834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eagly, A. H., Johannesen-Schmidt, M. C., & Van Engen, M. L. (2003). Transformational, transactional, and laissez-faire leadership styles: a meta-analysis comparing women and men. Psychological Bulletin 129(4), 569–591.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eagly, A. H., & Karau, S. J. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review 109(3), 573–598.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Earley, C. P., & Mosakowski, E. (2000). Creating hybrid team cultures: An empirical test of transnational team functioning. Academy of Management Journal 43(1), 26–49.Google Scholar
Earley, P. C., Wojnaroski, P., & Prest, W. (1987). Task planning and energy expended: Exploration of how goals influence performance. Journal of Applied Psychology 72(1), 107–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Endendijk, J. J., Groeneveld, M. G., Pol, L. D., Berkel, S. R., Hallers‐Haalboom, E. T., Bakermans‐Kranenburg, M. J., & Mesman, J. (2017). Gender differences in child aggression: Relations with gender‐differentiated parenting and parents’ gender‐role stereotypes. Child Development 88(1), 299–316.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ferguson, T. W. (2018). Female leadership and role congruity within the clergy: Communal leaders experience no gender differences yet agentic women continue to suffer backlash. Sex Roles 78(5-6), 409–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gipson, A. N., Pfaff, D. L., Mendelsohn, D. B., Catenacci, L. T., & Burke, W. W. (2017). Women and leadership: Selection, development, leadership style, and performance. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 53(1), 32–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gmür, M. (1991). KMGI-Konstanzer Managergeschlechtsrolleninventar: Ein Instrument zur Ermittlung der Wirksamkeit von Geschlechtsrollenstereotypen in der Personalauswahl. Forschungsbericht Nr. l des Lehrstuhls für Management der Universität Konstanz.Google Scholar
Gmür, M. (2004). Was ist ein ‘idealer Manager’ und was ist eine ‘ideale Managerin’? Geschlechtsrollenstereotypen und ihre Bedeutung für die Eignungsbeurteilung von Männern und Frauen in Führungspositionen. German Journal of Human Resource Management: Zeitschrift für Personalforschung 18(4), 396–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gupta, V. K., Han, S., Mortal, S. C., Silveri, S. D., & Turban, D. B. (2018). Do women CEOs face greater threat of shareholder activism compared to male CEOs? A role congruity perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology 103(2), 228–236.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hambrick, D. C., Cho, T. S., & Chen, M. J. (1996). The influence of top management team heterogeneity on firms’ competitive moves. Administrative Science Quarterly, 659–684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, M. C., Anderson, D., Broaddus, M., & Young, K. (2006). Gender stereotyping and under-representation of female characters in 200 popular children’s picture books: A twenty-first century update. Sex Roles 55(11-12), 757–765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, D. A., & Klein, K. J. (2007). What’s the difference? Diversity constructs as separation, variety, or disparity in organizations. Academy of Management Review 32(4), 1199–1228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, J. (2016). Dissecting a gendered organization: Implications for career trajectories for mid-career faculty women in STEM. The Journal of Higher Education 87(5), 605–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haslam, S. A., & Ryan, M. K. (2008). The road to the glass cliff: Differences in the perceived suitability of men and women for leadership positions in succeeding and failing organizations. The Leadership Quarterly 19(5), 530–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henry, S. K., Sandler, J., Passerini, L., & Darmstadt, G. L. (2017). Taking on the gender challenge in organisations: What does it take? Global Public Health 12(7), 846–857.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hill, N. E. (2015). Including fathers in the picture: A meta-analysis of parental involvement and students’ academic achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology 107(4), 919–934.Google Scholar
Holt, C. L., & Ellis, J. B. (1998). Assessing the current validity of the Bem sex-role inventory. Sex Roles 39(11-12), 929–941.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoobler, J. M., Wayne, S. J., & Lemmon, G. (2009). Bosses’ perceptions of family-work conflict and women’s promotability: Glass ceiling effects. Academy of Management Journal 52(5), 939–957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hymowitz, C., & Schellhardt, T. D. (1986). The glass ceiling: Why women can’t seem to break the invisible barrier that blocks them from the top jobs. The Wall Street Journal 24(1), 1573–1592.Google Scholar
Jeong, S. H., & Harrison, D. A. (2017). Glass breaking, strategy making, and value creating: Meta-analytic outcomes of women as CEOs and TMT members. Academy of Management Journal 60(4), 1219–1252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, M. M. (1963). Sex role learning in the nuclear family. Child Development 34(1), 319–333.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson, M. M. (1975). Fathers, mothers and sex typing. Sociological Inquiry 45(1), 15–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koch, A. J., D’Mello, S. D., & Sackett, P. R. (2015). A meta-analysis of gender stereotypes and bias in experimental simulations of employment decision making. Journal of Applied Psychology 100(1), 128.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koenig, A. M., Eagly, A. H., Mitchell, A. A., & Ristikari, T. (2011). Are leader stereotypes masculine? A meta-analysis of three research paradigms. Psychological bulletin 137(4), 616.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kotler, P., & Zaltman, G. (1971). Social marketing: an approach to planned social change. The Journal of Marketing, 35(3), 3–12. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lavy, S., Bareli, Y., & Ein-Dor, T. (2015). The effects of attachment heterogeneity and team cohesion on team functioning. Small Group Research 46(1), 27–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewin, K., Lippitt, R., & White, R. K. (1939). Patterns of aggressive behavior in experimentally created “social climates”. The Journal of Social Psychology 10(2), 269–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lips, H. M. (2017). Sex and gender: An introduction . Long Grove: Waveland Press.Google Scholar
Lv, B., Zhou, H., Guo, X., Liu, C., Liu, Z., & Luo, L. (2016). The relationship between academic achievement and the emotional well-being of elementary school children in China: The moderating role of parent-school communication. Frontiers in Psychology 7, 948.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meyerson, D. E., & Fletcher, J. K. (2000). A modest manifesto for shattering the glass ceiling. Harvard Business Review 78(1), 126–136.Google Scholar
Miller, C. T. (1984). Self-schemas, gender, and social comparison: A clarification of the related attributes hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 46(6), 1222–1229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mischel, W. (1970). Sex-typing and socialization. Carmichael’s Manual of Child Psychology 2, 3–72.Google Scholar
Mize, T. D. (2016). Sexual orientation in the labor market. American Sociological Review 81(6), 1132–1160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paris, L. D., & Decker, D. L. (2012). Sex role stereotypes: Does business education make a difference? Gender in Management: An International Journal 27(1), 36–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parsons, T. (1955). Family structure and the socialization of the child. Family, Socialization and Interaction Process, 35–131.Google Scholar
Poell, N., & Busse, R. (2017). Sex role stereotyping revisited – The case of German future managers. Unpublished. Currently under review of Feministische Studien.Google Scholar
Potter, C. (2016). ‘It’s the most important thing–I mean, the schooling’: father involvement in the education of children with autism. European Journal of Special Needs Education 31(4), 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell, G. N., & Butterfield, D. A. (1979). The “good manager”: Masculine or androgynous? Academy of Management Journal 22(2), 395–403.Google Scholar
Powell, G. N., Butterfield, D. A., & Parent, J. D. (2002). Gender and managerial stereotypes: have the times changed? Journal of Management 28(2), 177–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rao, A., & Kelleher, D. (2003). Institutions, organisations and gender equality in an era of globalisation. Gender & Development 11(1), 142–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rao, A., & Kelleher, D. (2005). Is there life after gender mainstreaming? Gender & Development 13(2), 57–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rao, A., Sandler, J., Kelleher, D., & Miller, C. (2015). Gender at Work: Theory and Practice for 21st Century Organizations . London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rink, F., & Ellemers, N. (2010). Benefiting from deep-level diversity: How congruence between knowledge and decision rules improves team decision making and team perceptions. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations 13(3), 345–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Runge, T. E., Frey, D., Gollwitzer, P. M., Helmreich, R. L., & Spence, J. T. (1981). Masculine (instrumental) and feminine (expressive) traits a comparison between students in the United States and West Germany. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 12(2), 142–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rustemeyer, R., & Thrien, S. (1989). Die Managerin – der Manager: Wie weiblich dürfen sie sein, wie männlich müssen sie sein? Zeitschrift für Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie 33, 108–116.Google Scholar
Rutherford, A. (2016). The effect of top-management team heterogeneity on performance in institutions of higher education. Public Performance & Management Review 40(1), 119–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryan, M. K., & Haslam, S. A. (2005). The glass cliff: Evidence that women are over‐represented in precarious leadership positions. British Journal of Management 16(2), 81–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryan, M. K., Haslam, S. A., Morgenroth, T., Rink, F., Stoker, J., & Peters, K. (2016). Getting on top of the glass cliff: Reviewing a decade of evidence, explanations, and impact. The Leadership Quarterly 27(3), 446–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sadler, A., & Linenberger, S. (2017). Midstream without a paddle: An examination of factors that prevent female leaders from entering executive waters. Journal of Behavioral and Applied Management 17(3), 213–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sahaym, A., Cho, S. Y., Kim, S. K., & Mousa, F. T. (2016). Mixed blessings: How top management team heterogeneity and governance structure influence the use of corporate venture capital by post-IPO firms. Journal of Business Research 69(3), 1208–1218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schein, V. E. (1973). The relationship between sex role stereotypes and requisite management characteristics. Journal of Applied Psychology 57(2), 95–100.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schein, V. E. (1975). Relationships between sex role stereotypes and requisite management characteristics among female managers. Journal of Applied Psychology 60(3), 340–344.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schein, V. E. (2001). A global look at psychological barriers to women’s progress in management. Journal of Social issues 57(4), 675–688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schein, V. E., & Müller, R. (1992). Sex role stereotyping and requisite management characteristics: A cross cultural look. Journal of Organizational Behavior 13(5), 439–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schein, V. E., Mueller, R., Lituchy, T., & Liu, J. (1996). Think manager – think male: A global phenomenon? Journal of Organizational Behavior 17(1), 33–41.3.0.CO;2-F>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schein, V. E., Müller, R., & Jacobson, C. (1989). The relationship between sex role stereotypes and requisite management characteristics among college students. Sex Roles 20(1-2), 103–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider-Düker, M., & Kohler, A. (1988). Die Erfassung von Geschlechtsrollen: Ergebnisse zur deutschen Neukonstruktion des Bem Sex-Role Inventory. Diagnostica 34(3), 256–270.Google Scholar
Spence, J. T., & Helmreich, R. L. (1979). Masculinity and femininity: Their psychological dimensions, correlates, and antecedents. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Srikanth, K., Harvey, S., & Peterson, R. (2016). A dynamic perspective on diverse teams: Moving from the dual-process model to a dynamic coordination-based model of diverse team performance. The Academy of Management Annals 10(1), 453–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stainback, K., Kleiner, S., & Skaggs, S. (2016). Women in power: Undoing or redoing the gendered organization? Gender & Society 30(1), 109–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, M., & Wänke, M. (2017). Caring or daring? Exploring the impact of facial masculinity/femininity and gender category information on first impressions. PLoS One 12(10), e0181306.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wood, W., & Eagly, A. H. (2015). Two traditions of research on gender identity. Sex Roles 73(11-12), 461–473. Retrieved 20 August, 2018 from https://www.bmfsfj.de/bmfsfj/aktuelles/alle-meldungen/frauenanteil-in-fuehrungspositionen-zu-gering/109260 CrossRefGoogle Scholar