Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T20:32:43.797Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Proactive market orientation and innovation in India: The moderating role of intrafirm causal ambiguity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 August 2016

C. Lakshman ,
Rajeev Kumra  and
Atanu Adhikari
C. Lakshman*
Affiliation:
Department of Business Administration, Tongji University School of Economics and Management, Shanghai, China
Rajeev Kumra
Affiliation:
Department of Marketing, Indian Institute of Management Lucknow, Noida Campus, Uttar Pradesh, India
Atanu Adhikari
Affiliation:
Department of Marketing, Indian Institute of Management Kozhikode, Kerala, India
*
Corresponding author: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Despite the implication of organizational resources and the resource-based view of the firm, the market orientation literature has not examined associated constructs. Additionally, while it is recognized that emerging economies (e.g., India) are key drivers of economic growth, this literature has not paid sufficient attention to such markets, with few exceptions. We examine the impact of proactive market orientation on innovation capability, and performance in a sample of predominantly service firms, in a culture characterized by high power distance and low uncertainty avoidance. We contribute by conceptualizing and demonstrating the moderating impact of intrafirm causal ambiguity, drawn from resource-based theories of the firm. Based on Structural Equation Modelling analysis of responses to a survey of marketing managers, we find that intra-firm causal ambiguity moderates the proactive market orientation-innovation capability relationship, while this strategic orientation is linked to business performance through innovation. We discuss these findings, limitations, implications, and directions for future research.

Keywords

proactive market orientationintrafirm causal ambiguitynew product developmentinnovationperformance
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Management & Organization , Volume 23 , Issue 1 , January 2017 , pp. 116 - 135
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and Australian and New Zealand Academy of Management 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adhikari, A., & Gill, M. S. (2012). Impact of resources, capabilities, and technology on market orientation of Indian B2B firms. Journal of Services Research, 11(2), 75–98.Google Scholar
Aggarwal, N. (2003). Organizational barriers to market orientation: An Indian experience. Journal of Management Research, 3(2), 87–97.Google Scholar
Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Ambrosini, V., & Bowman, C. (2010). The impact of causal ambiguity on competitive advantage and rent appropriation. British Journal of Management, 21, 939–953.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armstrong, J. S., & Overton, T. S. (1977). Estimating non response in mail surveys. Journal of Marketing Research, 16, 396–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atuahene‐Gima, K., Slater, S. F., & Olson, E. M. (2005). The contingent value of responsive and proactive market orientations for new product program performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 22(6), 464–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aulakh, P. S. (2009). Revisiting the internationalization – performance relationship: Implications for emerging economy firms. Decision, 36(2), 25–39.Google Scholar
Aulakh, P. S., Kotabe, M., & Teegen, H. (2000). Export strategies and performance of firms from emerging economies: Evidence from Brazil, Chile, and Mexico. Academy of Management Journal, 43(3), 342–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnabos, N., & Mekoth, N. (2010). Autonomy, market orientation, and performance in Indian retail banking. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 22(3), 330–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17, 99–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bodlaj, M., Coenders, G., & Zaskar, V. (2012). Responsive and proactive market orientation and innovation success under market and technological turbulence. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 13(4), 666–687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chittoor, R., Sarkar, M. B., Ray, S., & Aulakh, P. S. (2009). Third-world copycats to emerging multinationals: Institutional changes and organizational transformation in the Indian pharmaceutical industry. Organization Science, 20(1), 187–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christensen, C. M., & Bower, J. L. (1996). Customer power, strategic investment, and the failure of leading firms. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 197–218.3.0.CO;2-U>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cyert, R. M., & March, J. G. (1963). A behavioral theory of the firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Day, G. (1994). The capabilities of market-driven organizations. Journal of Marketing, 58(4), 37–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deshpande, R., & Farley, J. U. (1999). Corporate culture and market orientation: Comparing Indian and Japanese firms. Journal of International Marketing, 7(4), 111–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deshpande, R., Farley, J. U., & Webster, F. E. (1993). Corporate culture, customer orientation, and innovativeness in Japanese firms: A quadrad analysis. Journal of Marketing, 57(1), 23–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dhanraj, C., & Khanna, T. (2011). Transforming mental models on emerging markets. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 10(4), 684–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ettlie, J. E., & Subramanian, M. (2004). Changing strategies and tactics for new product development. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 21, 95–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galvin, P. (2014). A new vision for the journal of management & organization: The role of context. Journal of Management & Organization, 20, 1–5. doi:10.1017/jmo.2014.28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grant, R. M. (1996). Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 109–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenley, G. E. W. (1995). Forms of market orientation in UK companies. Journal of Management Studies, 32(1), 48–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grewal, R., Chandrashekaran, M., Johnson, J. L., & Mallapragada, G. (2013). Environments, unobserved heterogeneity, and the effect of market orientation on outcomes for high-tech firms. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 41(2), 206–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grewal, R., & Tansuhaj, P. (2001). Building organizational capabilities for managing economic crisis: The role of market orientation and strategic flexibility. Journal of Marketing, 65, 67–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamel, G., & Prahalad, C. K. (1994). Competing for the Future. Boston, MA: HBS Press.Google Scholar
Harris, L. C. (2001). Market orientation and performance: Objective and subjective empirical evidence from U.K. companies. Journal of Management Studies, 38, 17–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
House, R., Hanges, P., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P., & Gupta, V. (Eds.) (2004). Culture, leadership, and organizations: The globe study of 62 societies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Huber, G. P. (1991). Organizational learning: The contributing processes and the literatures. Organization Science, 2, 88–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hult, G. T. M., & Ketchen, D. J. (2001). Does market orientation matter? A test of the relationship between positional advantage and performance. Strategic Management Journal, 22, 899–906.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hult, G. T. M., Ketchen, D. J., & Slater, S. F. (2005). Market orientation and performance: An integration of disparate approaches. Strategic Management Journal, 26, 1173–1181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jain, S. K., & Bhatia, M. (2007). Market orientation and business performance: The case of Indian manufacturing firms. Vision – The journal of Business Perspective, 11(1), 15–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaworski, B. J., & Kohli, A. K. (1993). Market orientation: Antecedents and consequences. Journal of Marketing, 57, 53–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kapur, D., & Ramamurti, R. (2001). India’s emerging competitive advantage in services. Academy of Management Executive, 15(2), 20–32.Google Scholar
Ketchen, D. J., Hult, G. T. M., & Slater, S. F. (2007). Toward greater understanding of market orientation and the resource-based view. Strategic Management Journal, 28, 961–964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khanna, T., & Palepu, K. G. (2010). Winning in emerging markets: Spotting and responding to institutional voids. The World Financial Review, (May-June 2011): 18–20.Google Scholar
King, A. W. (2007). Disentangling interfirm and intrafirm causal ambiguity: A conceptual model of causal ambiguity and competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 32(1), 156–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, A. W., & Zeithaml, C. P. (2001). Competencies and firm performance: Examining the causal ambiguity paradox. Strategic Management Journal, 22, 75–99.3.0.CO;2-I>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirca, A. H., Bearden, W. O., & Hult, G. T. M. (2011). Forms of market orientation and firm performance: A complementary approach. AMS Review, 1(3–4), 145–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirca, A. H., Jayachandran, S., & Bearden, W. O. (2005). Market orientation: A meta-analytic review and assessment of its antecedents and impact on performance. Journal of Marketing, 69, 24–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohli, A. K., & Jaworski, B. J. (1990). Market orientation: The construct, research propositions, and managerial implications. The Journal of Marketing, 54, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumar, V., Jones, E., Venkatesan, R., & Leone, R. P. (2011). Is market orientation a source of sustainable competitive advantage or simply the cost of competing? Journal of Marketing, 75, 16–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumar, K., Subramanian, R., & Yauger, C. (1998). Examining the market orientation-performance relationship: A context specific study. Journal of Management, 24(2), 201–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lakshman, C. (2011). Effective post-acquisition integration: A knowledge-based approach. Human Resource Management, 50(5), 605–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lakshman, C., & Parente, R. (2008). Supplier-focused knowledge management in the automobile industry and its implications for product performance. Journal of Management Studies, 45, 317–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, T., & Chu, W. (2013). How entrepreneurial orientation, environmental dynamism, and resource rareness influence firm performance. Journal of Management & Organization, 19(2), 167–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, Y., Wei, Z., & Liu, Y. (2010). Strategic orientations, knowledge acquisition, and firm performance: The perspective of the vendor in cross-border outsourcing. Journal of Management Studies, 47(8), 1457–1482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, M.-J. J., Tu, Y.-C., Chen, D.-C., & Huang, C.-H. (2013). Customer participation and new product development outcomes: The moderating role of product innovativeness. Journal of Management & Organization, 19(3), 314–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matsuno, K., Mentzer, J. T., & Ozsomer, A. (2002). The effects of entrepreneurial proclivity and market orientation on business performance. Journal of Marketing, 66, 18–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, R. E., & Berthon, P. (2008). Market orientation, generative learning. Innovation strategy and business performance inter-relationships in bioscience firms. Journal of Management Studies, 45(8), 1330–1350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Narver, J. C., & Slater, S. F. (1990). The effect of market orientation on business profitability. Journal of Marketing, 53, 20–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Narver, J. C., Slater, S. F., & MacLachlan, D. L. (2004). Responsive and proactive market orientation and new product success. Journal of Product and Innovation Management, 21, 334–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pelham, A. (1997). Market orientation and performance: The moderating effects of product and customer differentiation. Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, 12(5), 276–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method bias in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879–903.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Simonin, B. L. (1999). Ambiguity and the process of knowledge transfer in strategic alliances. Strategic Management Journal, 20, 595–624.3.0.CO;2-5>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slater, S. F., & Narver, J. C. (1994). Does competitive environment moderate the market orientation–performance relationship? Journal of Marketing, 58, 46–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slater, S. F., & Narver, J. C. (1995). Market orientation and the learning organization. Journal of Marketing, 59(3), 63–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slater, S. F., & Narver, J. C. (1998). Customer-led and market-oriented: Let’s not confuse the two. Strategic Management Journal, 19(10), 1001–1006.3.0.CO;2-4>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szulanski, G. (1996). Exploring the internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17(1), 27–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szulanski, G., Cappetta, R., & Jensen, R. J. (2004). When and how trustworthiness matters: Knowledge transfer and the moderating role of causal ambiguity. Organization Science, 15(5), 600–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyler, B. B., & Gnyawali, D. R. (2009). Managerial collective cognitions: An examination of similarities and differences of cultural orientations. Journal of Management Studies, 46(1), 93–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uygur, U. (2013). Determinants of causal ambiguity and difficulty of knowledge transfer within the firm. Journal of Management & Organization, 19(6), 742–765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, L. J., Vandenbergh, R. J., & Edwards, J. R. (2009). Structural equation modeling in management research: A guide for improved analysis. The Academy of Management Annals, 3(1), 543–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar