Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T16:44:13.020Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Personal identity: How it moderates the relation between social identity and workplace performance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 December 2022

Adnan Ozyilmaz Open the ORCID record for Adnan Ozyilmaz [Opens in a new window]  and
Sema Koc
Adnan Ozyilmaz*
Affiliation:
Department of Business Administration, Carolina University, Patterson School of Business, 420 South Broad Street, Winston-Salem, NC 27101, USA
Sema Koc
Affiliation:
Department of Management and Organization, Karadeniz Technical University, Institute of Social Sciences, Trabzon, 61080, Turkey
*
Author for correspondence: Adnan Ozyilmaz, E-mail: [email protected], [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The present study benefits from social identity theory to argue that employees' organizational identity interacts with their trust propensity to predict affective organizational commitment and creativity. It used random coefficient regression procedures or multilevel modeling through the generalized linear mixed models command to test its hypothesis because the data that were collected in two of the studies were the nested or dependent data. Employing longitudinal data gathered from 153 participants and their 71 direct managers at a public organization in Study 1, the present study revealed that organizational identity had stronger positive influences on organizational commitment and creativity when participants' trust propensity was high. Employing longitudinal data collected from 210 employees of 32 business organizations and from 49 direct supervisors of the employees in Study 2, the present study reassured that trust propensity moderates the relationship between organizational identity and creativity. The present study contributes to the theory that employees' personal identity accentuates the positive relationship between their social identity and workplace outcomes such that the relationship becomes stronger as employees' personal identity increases.

Keywords

Creativityorganizational belongingnessorganizational commitmentorganizational identitypersonal identitysocial identitytrust propensity
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Management & Organization , First View , pp. 1 - 28
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press in association with the Australian and New Zealand Academy of Management

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Albert, S., Ashforth, B. E., & Dutton, J. E. (2000). Organizational identity and identification: Charting new waters and building new bridges. Academy of Management Review, 25, 13–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albert, S., & Whetten, D. (1985). Organizational identity. Research in Organizational Behavior, 7, 263–295.Google Scholar
Amabile, T. M., Barsade, S. G., Mueller, J. S., & Staw, B. M. (2005). Affect and creativity at work. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50, 367–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashforth, B. E., Harrison, S. H., & Corley, K. G. (2008). Identification in organizations: An examination of four fundamental questions. Journal of Management, 34, 325–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashforth, B. E., & Mael, F. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14, 20–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Audenaert, M., & Decrames, A. (2018). When empowering leadership fosters creative performance: The role of problem-solving demands and creative personality. Journal of Management & Organization, 24, 4–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baer, M. D., Matta, F. K., Kim, J. K., Welsh, D. T., & Garud, N. (2018). It's not you, it's them: Social influences on trust propensity and trust dynamics. Personnel Psychology, 71, 423–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bagozzi, R. P., Yi, Y., & Phillips, L. W. (1991). Assessing construct validity in organizational research. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36, 421–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bednar, J. S., Galvin, B. M., Ashforth, B. E., & Hafermalz, E. (2020). Putting identification in motion: A dynamic view of organizational identification. Organization Science, 31, 200–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 9, 165–195.Google Scholar
Bergami, M., & Bagozzi, R. P. (2000). Self-categorization, affective commitment and group self-esteem as distinct aspects of social identity in the organization. British Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 555–577.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bouncken, R. B., & Tiberius, V. (2021). Legitimacy processes and trajectories of co-presumption services: Insights from coworking spaces. Journal of Service Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/10946705211050208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brislin, R. W. (1970). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1, 185–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
British Council. (2020). Creative economy: Turkey. Retrieved on July 20, 2020 from https://creativeconomy.britishcouncil.org/places/turkey/.Google Scholar
Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In Bollen, K. & Long, J. (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Burke, C. S., Sims, D. E., Lazzara, E. H., & Salas, E. (2007). Trust in leadership: A multi-level review and integration. The Leadership Quarterly, 18, 606–632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charness, G., & Chen, Y. (2020). Social identity, group behavior, and teams. Annual Review of Economics, 12, 691–713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colquitt, J. A., Scott, B. A., & LePine, J. A. (2007). Trust, trustworthiness, and trust propensity: A meta-analytic test of their unique relationships with risk taking and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 909–927.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Conroy, S., Henle, C. A., Shore, L., & Stelman, S. (2017). Where there is light, there is dark: A review of the detrimental outcomes of high organizational identification. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 38, 189–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, D., & Thatcher, S. M. B. (2010). Identification in organizations: The role of self-concept orientations and identification motives. Academy of Management Review, 35, 516–538.Google Scholar
Costa, A. C., & Anderson, N. (2011). Measuring trust in teams: Development and validation of a multifaceted measure of formative and reflective indicators of team trust. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 20, 119–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Currall, S. C., & Judge, T. A. (1995). Measuring trust between organizational boundary role persons. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 64, 151–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawson, J. F. (2014). Moderation in management research: What, why, when and how. Journal of Business and Psychology, 29, 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dirks, K. T., & Ferrin, D. L. (2001). The role of trust in organizational settings. Organization Science, 12, 450–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dirks, K. T., & Ferrin, D. L. (2002). Trust in leadership: Meta-analytic findings and implications for research and practice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 611–628.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dukerich, J. M., Golden, B. R., & Shortell, S. M. (2002). Beauty is in the eye of the beholder: The impact of organizational identification, identity, and image on the cooperative behaviors of physicians. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47, 507–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellemers, N., De Gilder, D., & Haslam, S. A. (2004). Motivating individuals and groups at work: A social identity perspective on leadership and group performance. Academy of Management Review, 29, 459–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellemers, N., Kingma, L., Van de Burgt, J., & Barreto, M. (2011). Corporate social responsibility as a source of organizational morality, employee commitment and satisfaction. Journal of Organizational Moral Psychology, 1, 97–124.Google Scholar
Ellemers, N., Spears, R., & Doosje, B. (2002). Self and social identity. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 161–186.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Farmer, S. M., Tierney, P., & Kung-McIntyre, K. (2003). Employee creativity in Taiwan: An application of role identity theory. Academy of Management Journal, 46, 618–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferguson, A. J., & Peterson, R. S. (2015). Sinking slowly: Diversity in propensity to trust predicts downward trust spirals in small groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100, 1012–1024.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fisher, S. L., & Ford, J. K. (1998). Differential effects of learner effort and goal orientation on two learning outcomes. Personnel Psychology, 51, 397–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, G., Neubert, E., & Burnell, D. (2021). Resourcefulness narratives: Transforming actions into stories to mobilize support. Journal of Business Venturing, 36, 106122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 382–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frazier, M. L., Johnson, P. D., & Fainshmidt, S. (2013). Development and validation of a propensity to trust scale. Journal of Trust Research, 3, 76–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaertner, L., Sedikides, C., & Graetz, K. (1999). In search of self-definition: Motivational primacy of the collective self, or contextual primacy? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 5–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gardner, R. G., Harris, T. B., Li, N., Kirkman, B., & Mathieu, J. E. (2017). Understanding “it depends” in organizational research: A theory-based taxonomy, review, and future research agenda for concerning interactive and quadratic relationships. Organizational Research Methods, 20, 610–638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godard, J. (1991). The progressive HRM paradigm: A theoretical and empirical re-examination. Industrial Relations, 46, 378–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godard, J. (2001). High performance and the transformation of work? The implications of alternative work practices for the experience and outcomes of work. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 54, 776–805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haslam, S. A. (2004). Psychology in organizations: The social identity approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc.Google Scholar
Haslam, S. A., Eggins, R. A., & Reynolds, K. J. (2003). The ASPIRe model: Actualizing social and personal identity resources to enhance organizational outcomes. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 76, 83–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haslam, S. A., Ryan, M. K., Postmes, T., Spears, R., Jetten, J., & Webley, P. (2006). Sticking to our guns: Social identity as a basis for the maintenance of commitment to flattering organizational projects. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27, 607–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirst, G., Van Dick, R., & Van Knippenberg, D. (2009). A social identity perspective on leadership and employee creativity. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30, 963–982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture's consequences. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Hogg, M. A., & Terry, D. J. (2000). Social identity and self-categorization processes in organizational contexts. Academy of Management Review, 25, 121–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hsu, H. Y., Kwok, O. M., Lin, J. H., & Acosta, S. (2015). Detecting misspecified multilevel structural equation models with common fit indices: A Monte Carlo study. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 50, 197–215.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huff, L., & Kelley, L. (2003). Levels of organizational trust in individualist versus collectivist societies: A seven-nation study. Organization Science, 14, 81–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Javed, B., Rawwas, M. Y., Khandai, S., Shahid, K., & Tayyeb, H. B. (2018). Ethical leadership, trust in leader and creativity: The mediated mechanism and an interacting effect. Journal of Management and Organization, 24, 488–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kane, A., Argote, L., & Levine, J. M. (2005). Knowledge transfer between groups via personnel relations: Effects of social identity and knowledge quality. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 96, 56–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karatepe, O. M. (2016). Does job embeddedness mediate the effects of coworker and family support on creative performance? An empirical study in the hotel industry. Journal of Human Resources in Hospitality and Tourism, 15, 119–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Kramer, R. M. (1999). Trust and distrust in organizations: Emerging perspectives, enduring questions. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 569–598.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, E.-S., Park, T.-Y., & Koo, B. (2015). Identifying organizational identification as a basis for attitudes and behaviors: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 141, 1049–1080.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, J., Rhee, M., & Park, K. M. (2020). Looking backward through the looking glass: Reference groups and social comparison. Journal of Management & Organization, 26, 110–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Little, T. D., Cunningham, W. A., Shahar, G., & Widaman, K. F. (2002). To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question, weighing the merits. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 151–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lux, A. A., Grover, S. L., & Teo, S. T. T. (2019). Reframing commitment in authentic leadership: Untangling relationship-outcome processes. Journal of Management and Organization. https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2019.78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madjar, N., Greenberg, E., & Chen, Z. (2011). Factors for radical creativity, incremental creativity, and routine, noncreative performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96, 730–743.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20, 709–734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayer, R. C., & Gavin, M. B. (2005). Trust in management and performance. Who minds the shop while the employees watch the boss? Academy of Management Journal, 48, 874–888.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1, 61–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1997). Commitment in the workplace: Theory, research, and application. Thousand Oak, CA: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, J. P., Becker, T. E., & Van Dick, R. (2006). Social identities and commitments at work: Toward an integrated model. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27, 665–683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michel, A. A., & Jehn, K. E. (2003). The dark side of identification: Overcoming identification-induced performance impediments. In Polzer, J. (Ed.), Identity issues in groups (research on managing groups and teams (Vol. 5, pp. 189–219). Bigley, England: Emerald.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, R. B., & Hollist, C. S. (2007). Attrition bias. In Salkind, E. N. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of measurement and statistics (Vol. 1, pp. 57–60). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Nambudiri, R. (2012). Propensity to trust and organizational commitment: A study in the Indian pharmaceutical sector. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 23, 977–986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Navis, C., & Glynn, M. A. (2011). Legitimate distinctiveness and entrepreneurial identity: Influence on investor judgements of new venture plausibility. Academy of Management Review, 36, 479–499.Google Scholar
Nifadkar, S. S., & Bauer, T. N. (2016). Breach of belongingness: Newcomer relationship conflict, information, and task-related outcomes during organizational socialization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101, 1–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oberski, D. (2014). Lavaan.survey: An R package for complex survey analysis of structural equation models. Journal of Statistical Software, 57, 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
OECD (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development) (2020). OECD economic survey: Turkey. Retrieved on July 20, 2020 from http://www.oecd.org/economy/surveys/Turkey-2018-OECD-economic-survey-overview.pdf.Google Scholar
Oldham, G. R., & Cummings, A. (1996). Employee creativity: Personal and contextual factors at work. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 607–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ozyilmaz, A., Erdogan, B., & Karaeminogullari, A. (2018). Trust in organization as a moderator of the relationship between self-efficacy and workplace outcomes: A social cognitive theory-based investigation. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 91, 181–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peralta, C. F., & Saldanha, M. F. (2014). Knowledge-centered culture and knowledge sharing: The moderator role of trust propensity. Journal of Knowledge Management, 18, 538–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piening, E. P., Salge, T. O., Antons, D., & Kreiner, G. E. (2020). Standing together or falling apart? Understanding employees’ responses to organizational identity threats. Academy of Management Review, 45, 325–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Podsako, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsako, N. P. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 539–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Randel, A. E., Galvin, B. M., Shore, L. M., Ehrhart, K. H., Chung, B. G., Dean, M. A., & Kedharnath, U. (2018). Inclusive leadership: Realizing positive outcomes through belongingness and being valued for uniqueness. Human Resource Management Review, 28, 190–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ravasi, D., Rindova, V., & Stigliani, I. (2019). The stuff of legend: History, memory, and the temporality of organizational identity construction. Academy of Management Journal, 62, 1523–1555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riketta, M. (2005). Organizational identification: A meta-analysis. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 66, 358–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rotondi, T. Jr. (1975). Organizational identification: Issues and implications. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 13, 95–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rotter, J. B. (1967). A new scale for the measurement of interpersonal trust. Journal of Personality, 35, 651–665.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rotter, J. B. (1980). Interpersonal trust, trustworthiness, and gullibility. American Psychologist, 35, 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snijders, T. A. B., & Bosker, R. J. (2012). Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Stack, L. C. (1978). Trust. In London, H. & Exner, J. E. Jr. (Eds.), Dimensionality of personality (pp. 561–599). New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
Tajfel, H. (1972). Experiments in a vacuum. In Isreal, J. & Tajfel, H. (Eds.), The context of social psychology (pp. 69–122). London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Tajfel, H. (1978). Social categorization, social identity and social comparison. In Tajfel, H. (Ed.), Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 61–76). London, Academic Press.Google Scholar
Tajfel, H. (1981). Human groups and social categories: Studies in social psychology. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tajfel, H. (1982). Social psychology of intergroup relations. Annual Review of Psychology, 33, 1–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1985). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In Worchel, S. & Austin, W. G. (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (2nd ed., pp. 7–24). Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall.Google Scholar
Tierney, P. (2015). An identity perspective on creative action in organizations. In Shalley, C. E., Zhou, J., & Hitt, M. (Eds.), Oxford handbook of organizational creativity, innovation, and entrepreneurship (pp. 79–92). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Turner, J. C. (1982). Towards a cognitive redefinition of the social group. In Tajfel, H. (Ed.), Social identity and intergroup relations (pp. 15–40). Cambridge: Cambridge University.Google Scholar
Turner, J. C. (1985). Social categorization and the self-concept: A social cognitive theory of group behaviour. In Lawler, E. J. (Ed.), Advances in group processes: Theory and Research (Vol. 2, pp. 77–122). Greenwich, CT: JAI.Google Scholar
Turner, J. C., & Onorato, R. (1999). Social identity, personality and the self-concept: A self-categorization perspective. In Tyler, T. R., Kramer, R., & John, O. (Eds.), The psychology of the social self (pp. 1–36). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Turner, J. C., & Reynolds, K. J. (2012). Self-categorization theory. In Van Lange, P. A. M., Kruglanski, A. W., & Higgins, E. T. (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (pp. 399–417). London: Sage publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van der Werff, L., Freeney, Y., Lance, C. E., & Buckley, F. (2019). A trait-state model of trust propensity: Evidence from two career transitions. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Dick, R., Van Knippenberg, D., Kerschreiter, R., Hertel, G., & Wieseke, J. (2008). Interactive effects of work group and organizational identification on job satisfaction and extra-role behavior. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 72, 388–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Dick, R., Wagner, U., Stellmacher, J., & Ohrist, O. (2004). The utility of a conceptualization of organizational identification: Which aspects really matter? Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 77, 171–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Knippenberg, D., & Hogg, M. (2018). Social identifications in organizational behavior. In Ferris, D. L., Johnson, R. E., & Sedikides, C. (Eds.), The self at work: Fundamental theory and research (pp. 72–91). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Van Knippenberg, D., & Van Schie, E. C. M. (2000). Foci and correlates of organizational identification. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73, 137–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whetten, D. A., & Mackey, A. (2002). A social actor contention of organizational identity and its implications for the study of organizational reputation. Business & Society, 41, 393–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, L. J., Vanderberg, R. J., & Edwards, J. R. (2009). Structural equation modeling in management research: A guide for improved analysis. The Academy of Management Annals, 3, 543–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yao, J., Zhang, Z.-X., & Brett, J. M. (2017). Understanding trust development in negotiations. An interdependent approach. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 38, 712–729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yuan, K.-H., Bentler, P. M., & Zhang, W. (2005). The effect of skewness and kurtosis on mean and covariance structure analysis: The univariate and multivariate applications. Sociological Methods and Research, 34, 240–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, J., & Dou, J., & Wang, X. (2019, in press). A double-edged sword: When does identity threat affect unethical behavior? Journal of Management and Organization. https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2019.80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, J., & George, J. M. (2001). When job dissatisfaction leads to creativity: Encouraging the expression of voice. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 682–696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, J., Wang, X. M., Bavato, D., Tasselli, S., & Wu, J. (2019). Understanding the receiving side of creativity: A multidisciplinary review and implementations for management research. Journal of Management, 45, 2570–2595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar