Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T06:29:39.989Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The impact of prestigious top management team on international alliance formation: Evidence from Taiwanese electronics firms

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2015

Yu-Kai (Mike) Wang
Yu-Kai (Mike) Wang*
Affiliation:
Department of Business Administration, Soochow University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
*
Corresponding author: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Forming strategic alliances with foreign organizations is critical for firms, as it can enable them to access external resources globally. However, because firms, especially those in emerging economies, may possess less legitimacy in foreign countries, potential foreign alliance partners may lack satisfactory organizational information to adequately evaluate them. By applying signaling theory, this study argues that alternative sources, such as the prestige characteristics of the top management team, play an important role in signaling the quality of firms. Additionally, this study expects that the effects of the prestige characteristics of top management teams on the formation of international strategic alliances are lessened when the number of prior international alliances increases. The empirical results support our arguments. Overall, this study contributes by bringing signaling theory into the research of the formation of international strategic alliances.

Keywords

alliances and joint venturestop management teamssignaling theory
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Management & Organization , Volume 21 , Issue 6 , November 2015 , pp. 835 - 852
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and Australian and New Zealand Academy of Management 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anand, B. N., & Khanna, T. (2000). Do firms learn to create value? The case of alliances. Strategic Management Journal, 21, 295–315.3.0.CO;2-O>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailey, E. E., & Helfat, C. E. (2003). External management succession, human capital, and firm performance: An integrative analysis. Managerial and Decision Economics, 24, 347–369.Google Scholar
BarNir, A., & Smith, K. A. (2002). Interfirm alliances in the small business: The role of social networks. Journal of Small Business Management, 40, 219–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartlet, C. A., & Ghoshal, S. (1989). Managing across borders: The transnational solution. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Baty, G. B., Evan, W. M., & Rothermel, T. W. (1971). Personnel flows as interorganizational relations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 16, 430–443.Google Scholar
Boeker, W. (1997). Executive migration and strategic change: The effect of top manager movement on product-market entry. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 213–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, R. S. (2012). The role of legitimacy for the survival of new firms. Journal of Management & Organization, 18, 412–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burt, R. S., & Knez, M. (1995). Kinds of third-party effects on trust. Rationality and Society, 7, 255–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carpenter, M. A., & Fredrickson, J. W. (2001). Top management teams, global strategic posture, and the moderating role of uncertainty. Academy of Management Journal, 44(3), 533–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chacar, A. S, Newburry, W., & Vissa, B. (2010). Bringing institutions into performance persistence research: Exploring the impact of product, financial, and labor market institutions. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(7), 1119–1140.Google Scholar
Chun, R. (2005). Corporate reputation: Meaning and measurement. International Journal of Management Reviews, 7, 91–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chung, C. N., & Luo, X. R. (2013). Leadership succession and firm performance in an emerging economy: Successor origin, relational embeddedness, and legitimacy. Strategic Management Journal, 34, 338–357.Google Scholar
Cohen, B. D., & Dean, T. J. (2005). Information asymmetry and investor valuation of IPOs: Top management team legitimacy as a capital market signal. Strategic Management Journal, 26, 683–690.Google Scholar
Connelly, B. L., Certo, S. T., Ireland, R. D., & Reutzel, C. R. (2011). Signaling theory: A review and assessment. Journal of Management, 37, 39–67.Google Scholar
Contractor, F. J., & Lorange, P. (1988). Cooperative strategies in international business: Point ventures and technology partnerships between firms. Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath and Company.Google Scholar
Coombs, J. E., Bierly, P. E. III, & Gallagher, S. (2012). The impact of different forms of IPO firm legitimacy on the choice of alliance governance structure. Journal of Management & Organization, 18, 516–536.Google Scholar
Cuypers, I. R., & Martin, X. (2010). What makes and what does not make a real option&quest: A study of equity shares in international joint ventures. Journal of International Business Studies, 41, 47–69.Google Scholar
Dacin, M. T., Hitt, M. A., & Levitas, E. (1997). Selecting partners for successful international alliances: Examination of US and Korean firms. Journal of World Business, 32, 3–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D’Aveni, R. A. (1990). Top managerial prestige and organizational bankruptcy. Organization Science, 1, 121–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Debackere, K., & Rappa, M. A. (1995). Scientists at major and minor universities: Mobility along the prestige continuum. Research Policy, 24, 137–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 147–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dokko, G., & Rosenkopf, L. (2010). Social capital for hire? Mobility of technical professionals and firm influence in wireless standards committees. Organization Science, 21, 677–695.Google Scholar
Dowling, J., & Pfeffer, J. (1975). Organizational legitimacy: Social values and organizational behavior. Pacific Sociological Review, 18, 122–136.Google Scholar
Doz, Y, & Hamel, G. (1998). Alliance advantages: The art of creating value through partnering. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Dunning, J. H. (1995). Reappraising the eclectic paradigm in an age of alliance capitalism. Journal of International Business Studies, 26, 461–491.Google Scholar
Dunning, J. H., & Lundan, S. M. (2008). Multinational enterprises and the global economy. Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd. Google Scholar
Dyer, J. H., & Singh, H. (1998). The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23, 660–679.Google Scholar
Eisenhardt, K. M., & Schoonhoven, C. B. (1996). Resource-based view of strategic alliance formation: Strategic and social effects in entrepreneurial firms. Organization Science, 7, 136–150.Google Scholar
Finkelstein, S. (1992). Power in top management teams: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 35, 505–538.Google Scholar
Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360–1380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greene, W. H. (2003). Econometric an alysis (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Gulati, R. (1995). Social structure and alliance formation patterns: A longitudinal analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 619–652.Google Scholar
Gulati, R. (1998). Alliances and networks. Strategic Management Journal, 19, 293–317.Google Scholar
Hambrick, D. C., & Mason, P. A. (1984). Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9, 193–206.Google Scholar
Hannan, M. T., & Freeman, J. (1984). Organisational ecology. Boston, MA: Harvard University School Press.Google Scholar
Harrigan, K. R. (1986). Managing for joint venture success. New York, NY: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Higgins, M. C., & Gulati, R. (2003). Getting off to a good start: The effects of upper echelon affiliations on underwriter prestige. Organization Science, 14, 244–263.Google Scholar
Higgins, M. C., & Gulati, R. (2006). Stacking the deck: The effects of top management backgrounds on investor decisions. Strategic Management Journal, 27, 1–25.Google Scholar
Hitt, M. A., Hoskisson, R. E., & Kim, H. (1997). International diversification: Effects on innovation and firm performance in product-diversified firms. Academy of Management Journal, 40, 767–798.Google Scholar
Hoehn‐Weiss, M. N., & Karim, S. (2013). Unpacking functional alliance portfolios: How signals of viability affect young firms' outcomes. Strategic Management Journal, 35, 1364–1385.Google Scholar
Hoskisson, R. E., Eden, L., Lau, C. M., & Wright, M. (2000). Strategy in emerging economies. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 249–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inkpen, A. (2001). Strategic alliances. In M. A. Hitt, R. E. Freeman, & J. S. Harrison (Eds.), Handbook of strategic management (pp. 409–432). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
Inkpen, A. C., & Beamish, P. W. (1997). Knowledge, bargaining power, and the instability of international joint ventures. Academy of Management Review, 22, 177–202.Google Scholar
Khoury, T. A., Junkunc, M., & Deeds, D. L. (2013). The social construction of legitimacy through signaling social capital: Exploring the conditional value of alliances and underwriters at IPO. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 37, 569–601.Google Scholar
Kim, J. W., & Higgins, M. C. (2007). Where do alliances come from? The effects of upper echelons on alliance formation. Research Policy, 36, 499–514.Google Scholar
Knight, G. A., & Cavusgil, S. T. (2004). Innovation, organizational capabilities, and the born-global firm. Journal of International Business Studies, 35, 124–142.Google Scholar
Kostova, T., & Zaheer, S. (1999). Organizational legitimacy under conditions of complexity: The case of the multinational enterprise. Academy of Management Review, 24, 64–81.Google Scholar
Lee, H. U., & Park, J. H. (2008). The influence of top management team international exposure on international alliance formation. Journal of Management Studies, 45, 961–981.Google Scholar
Lester, R. H., Certo, S. T., Dalton, C. M., Dalton, D. R., & Cannella, A. A. (2006). Initial public offering investor valuations: An examination of top management team prestige and environmental uncertainty. Journal of Small Business Management, 44, 1–26.Google Scholar
Luo, X. R., Koput, K. W., & Powell, W. W. (2009). Intellectual capital or signal? The effects of scientists on alliance formation in knowledge-intensive industries. Research Policy, 38, 1313–1325.Google Scholar
Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83, 340–363.Google Scholar
Michalisin, M. D., Karau, S. J., & Conrad, E. (2006). Top management team attraction as a strategic asset: A longitudinal simulation test of the resource based view. Journal of Applied Business Research, 22, 109–122.Google Scholar
Mowery, D. C., Oxley, J. E., & Silverman, B. S. (1996). Strategic alliances and interfirm knowledge transfer. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 77–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neter, J., Wasserman, W., & Kutner, M. H. (1996). Applied linear statistical models: Regression, analysis of variance and experimental designs (4th ed.). Homewood, IL: Irwin.Google Scholar
Nohria, N., & Garcia‐Pont, C. (1991). Global strategic linkages and industry structure. Strategic Management Journal, 12(S1), 105–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliver, C. (1991). Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of Management Review, 16, 145–179.Google Scholar
Ozmel, U., Reuer, J. J., & Gulati, R. (2013). Signals across multiple networks: How venture capital and alliance networks affect interorganizational collaboration. Academy of Management Journal, 56, 852–866.Google Scholar
Pfeffer, J. S., & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. New York, NY: Harper & Row Publishers.Google Scholar
Piaskowska, D., & Trojanowski, G. (2014). Twice as smart? The importance of managers’ formative‐years’ international experience for their international orientation and foreign acquisition decisions. British Journal of Management, 25, 40–57.Google Scholar
Podolny, J. M. (1994). Market uncertainty and the social character of economic exchange. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39, 458–483.Google Scholar
Pollock, T. G., Chen, G., Jackson, E. M., & Hambrick, D. C. (2010). How much prestige is enough? Assessing the value of multiple types of high-status affiliates for young firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 25, 6–23.Google Scholar
Pollock, T. G., & Gulati, R. (2007). Standing out from the crowd: The visibility-enhancing effects of IPO-related signals on alliance formation by entrepreneurial firms. Strategic Organization, 5, 339–372.Google Scholar
Reuer, J. J., & Lahiri, N. (2013). Searching for alliance partners: Effects of geographic distance on the formation of R&D collaborations. Organization Science, 25, 283–298.Google Scholar
Reuer, J. J., & Ragozzino, R. (2014). Signals and international alliance formation: The roles of affiliations and international activities. Journal of International Business Studies, 45, 321–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenfeld, S. A. (1996). Does cooperation enhance competitiveness? Assessing the impacts of inter-firm collaboration. Research Policy, 25, 247–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sampson, R. C. (2007). R&D alliances and firm performance: The impact of technological diversity and alliance organization on innovation. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 364–386.Google Scholar
Sanders, W. M., & Boivie, S. (2004). Sorting things out: Valuation of new firms in uncertain markets. Strategic Management Journal, 25, 167–186.Google Scholar
Schilling, M. A. (2009). Understanding the alliance data. Strategic Management Journal, 30, 233–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shah, R. H., & Swaminathan, V. (2008). Factors influencing partner selection in strategic alliances: The moderating role of alliance context. Strategic Management Journal, 29, 471–494.Google Scholar
Sine, W. D., Shane, S., & Gregorio, D. D. (2003). The halo effect and technology licensing: The influence of institutional prestige on the licensing of university inventions. Management Science, 49, 478–496.Google Scholar
Singh, J. V., House, R. J., & Tucker, D. J. (1986). Organizational change and organizational mortality. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31, 587–611.Google Scholar
Spence, A. M. (1974). Market signaling: Informational transfer in hiring and related screening processes. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Steensma, H. K., Marino, L., Weaver, K. M., & Dickson, P. H. (2000). The influence of national culture on the formation of technology alliances by entrepreneurial firms. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 951–973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stern, I., Dukerich, J. M., & Zajac, E. (2014). Unmixed signals: How reputation and status affect alliance formation. Strategic Management Journal, 35, 512–531.Google Scholar
Stettner, U., & Lavie, D. (2014). Ambidexterity under scrutiny: Exploration and exploitation via internal organization, alliances, and acquisitions. Strategic Management Journal, 35, 1903–1929.Google Scholar
Stuart, T. E. (1998). Network positions and propensities to collaborate: An investigation of strategic alliance formation in a high-technology industry. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43, 668–698.Google Scholar
Sullivan, B. N., & Tang, Y. (2013). Which signal to rely on? The impact of the quality of board interlocks and inventive capabilities on research and development alliance formation under uncertainty. Strategic Organization, 11, 364–388.Google Scholar
Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20, 571–610.Google Scholar
Sullivan, B. N., & Tang, Y. (2013). Which signal to rely on? The impact of the quality of board interlocks and inventive capabilities on research and development alliance formation under uncertainty. Strategic Organization, 11, 364–388.Google Scholar
Tyler, B. B., & Steensma, H. K. (1998). The effects of executives’ experiences and perceptions on their assessment of potential technological alliances. Strategic Management Journal, 19, 939–965.Google Scholar
Waring, G. F. (1996). Industry differences in the persistence of firm-specific returns. The American Economic Review, 86, 1253–1265.Google Scholar
Wiersema, M. F., & Bantel, K. A. (1992). Top management team demography and corporate strategic change. Academy of Management Journal, 35, 91–121.Google Scholar
Williamson, O. E. (1975). Markets and hierarchies, analysis and antitrust implications. New York, NY: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Zaheer, S. (1995). Overcoming the liability of foreignness. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 341–363.Google Scholar
Zhang, Y., & Rajagopalan, N. (2010). Once an outsider, always an outsider? CEO origin, strategic change, and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 31(3), 334–346.Google Scholar
Zhang, Y., & Wiersema, M. F. (2009). Stock market reaction to CEO certification: The signaling role of CEO background. Strategic Management Journal, 30, 693–710.Google Scholar