Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T20:02:32.645Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Growth at Hubbard's Foods?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 September 2015

Jodyanne Kirkwood
Affiliation:
Department of Management, University of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin, New Zealand, Phone: +64 3 479 8523, Fax: +64 3 479 8173, Email: [email protected]
Diane Ruwhiu
Affiliation:
Department of Management, University of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin, New Zealand, Phone: +64 3 479 8523, Fax: +64 3 479 8173, Email: [email protected]

Abstract

Dick Hubbard is the founder of Hubbard's Foods Limited. The company is a cereal manufacturer located in Mangere, Auckland. This case highlights the entrepreneurial flair that Dick has, as well as his stance on social responsibility. Hubbard's has grown from a micro-business into a large business with 120 staff, while maintaining a family based culture. It is this question of whether the business should grow further that is the focus of the case.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and Australian and New Zealand Academy of Management 2003 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Elkin, G & Inkson, K 2000, Organisational behaviour in New Zealand: theory and practice, Prentice Hall, Auckland.Google Scholar
Hubbard's Foods Ltd 2001, Triple Bottom Line Report 2000-2001, <http://www.hubbards.co.nz>>Google Scholar
Interview with Dick Hubbard, 10 2000.Google Scholar
Interview with New Product Development Manager. 10 2000 Google Scholar
New Zealand Herald 2000, Breakfast king offers plenty to chew on, viewed 13 10 2000. <http://www.nzheiald.co.nz>>Google Scholar
Walker, R & Monin, N 2001, ‘The purpose of the picnic: using Burke's dramatistic pentad to analyse a company event’, Journal of Organizational Change Management, vol. 14, no. 3., pp. 266279.Google Scholar