Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T11:09:28.875Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Facilitating a deep approach to learning: An innovative case assessment technique

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 February 2015

Payyazhi Jayashree  and
Sumit Mitra
Payyazhi Jayashree
Affiliation:
University of Wollongong in Dubai, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
Sumit Mitra
Affiliation:
Indian Institute of Management, Kozhikode, India
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This research is an attempt to explore the impact of an innovative case assessment technique on a deep versus surface approach to learning as adopted by a large cohort of undergraduate management students studying in a reputed University. Specifically, a case assessment incorporating peer assessment in the form of a Case Challenge was introduced by the researchers to enhance deep learning, as an innovation to compartmentalized approaches to case assessment that may foster surface-level approaches to learning. Data collected through structured interviews suggest that inclusion of a challenge component in case analyses, directed and led by a peer group, substantially increased the level of preparation and ownership assumed by both the presenting team and challenging team in their own learning as also learning for the rest of the class. Results are discussed in the context of contemporary literature on learning-oriented assessment in general and the impact of peer assessments on deep versus surface approaches to learning in particular.

Keywords

deep vs. surface approaches to learninglearning-oriented assessmentcase assessmentpeer assessments
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Management & Organization , Volume 18 , Issue 4 , July 2012 , pp. 555 - 572
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and Australian and New Zealand Academy of Management 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Akella, D. (2010). Learning together: Kolb's experiential theory and its application. Journal of Management and Organization, 16(1), 100–112.Google Scholar
Benn, S., & Rusinko, C. (2011). The technological community as a framework for educating for sustain-ability in business schools. Journal of Management and Organization, 17(5), 656–669.Google Scholar
Biggs, J. (1999). Teaching for quality learning at university. Buckingham, England: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2009). Teaching for quality learning at university (3rd ed.). Maidenhead, England: Open University Press, McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Black, P., & William, D. (1998a). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 80(2), 139–148.Google Scholar
Black, P., & William, D. (1998b). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education, 5(1), 7–74.Google Scholar
Blanchard, P. N., & Thacker, J. W. (2007). Effective training: Systems, strategies and practices (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Bonwell, C. C., & Eison, J. A. (1991). Active learning: Creating excitement in the classroom, ASHE_ERIC Higher Education Report No.1. Washington, DC: The George Washington University, School of Education and Human Development.Google Scholar
Booth, P., Luckett, P., & Mladenovic, R. (1999). The quality of learning in accounting education: The impact of approaches to learning on academic performance. Accounting Education, 8(4), 277–300.Google Scholar
Boud, D. (2000). Sustainable assessment: Rethinking assessment for the learning society. Studies in Continuing Education, 22(2), 151–167.Google Scholar
Boud, D., & Falchikov, N. (2006). Aligning assessment with long-term learning. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 31(4), 399–413.Google Scholar
Boud, D., & Falchikov, N. (Eds). (2007). Rethinking assessment in higher education: Learning for the longer term. London, England: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bubna-Litic, D., & Benn, S. (2003). The MBA at the crossroads: Design issues for the future. Journal of Management and Organization, 9(3), 25–36.Google Scholar
Burdett, J., & Hastie, B. (2009). Predicting satisfaction with group work assignments. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 6(1), 61–71.Google Scholar
Carless, D. (2006). Differing perceptions in the feedback process. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 219–233.Google Scholar
Carless, D., Joughin, G., & Liu, N.-F. (2006). How assessment supports learning: Learning-oriented assessment in action. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.Google Scholar
Cheng, W., & Warren, M. (2000). Making a difference: Using peers to assess individual students' contributions to a group project. Teaching in Higher Education, 5(2), 243–255.Google Scholar
Davidson, R. (2002). Relationship of study approach and exam performance. Journal of Accounting Education, 20, 29–44.Google Scholar
Davis, C., & Wilcock, E. (2008). Teaching materials using case studies. Retrieved June 9, 2008, from http://www.materials.ac.uk/guides/casestudies.aspGoogle Scholar
Dimmock, K., Breen, H., & Walo, M. (2003). Management competencies: An Australian assessment of tourism and hospitality students. Journal of Management and Organization, 9(1), 12–26.Google Scholar
Dunwoodie, K., & Ainsworth, M. (1999). Acknowledging student diversity: Modifying the MBA experience for international students. Journal of Management and Organization, 5(1), 35–45.Google Scholar
Elkin, G. (2002). Student learning through case research and writing. Journal of Management and Organization, 8(1), 1–8.Google Scholar
Ellmers, G., Foley, M., & Bennett, S. (2008). Graphic design education: A revised assessment approach to encourage deep learning. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 5(1), 77–87.Google Scholar
Entwistle, N. J. (1991). Approaches to learning and perceptions of the learning environment: Introduction to the special issue. Higher Education, 22, 201–204.Google Scholar
Erskine, J. A., Leenders, M. R., & Mauffette-Leenders, L. A. (2003). Teaching with cases (3rd ed.). London, ONT: The University of Western Ontario, Richard Ivey School of Business, Ivey Publishing.Google Scholar
Esposto, A. S., & Weaver, D. C. (2011). Team assessment to improve student engagement and active learning. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 8(1), 1–11.Google Scholar
Falchikov, N., & Goldfinch, J. (2000). Student peer assessment in higher education: A metaanalyses comparing peer and teacher marks. Review of Educational Research, 70(3), 287–322.Google Scholar
Gibbs, G., & Simpson, C. (2004–2005). Conditions under which assessment supports student's learning. Learning and Teaching in Higher Education, 1, 1–31.Google Scholar
Harman, K. E. (2010). Innovations in coordinating undergraduate students' oral tutorial presentations. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 7(1), 1–13.Google Scholar
Higgins, R., Hartley, P., & Skeleton, A. (2002). The conscientious consumer: Reconsidering the role of assessment feedback in student learning. Studies in Higher Education, 27(1), 53–64.Google Scholar
Hunter, J. D., Vickery, J., & Smyth, R. (2010). Enhancing learning outcomes through group work in an internationalized undergraduate business education context. Journal of Management and Organization, 16(5), 700–714.Google Scholar
Hyland, P. (2000). Learning from feedback on assessment. In Hyland, P. & Booth, A. (Eds.), The practice of university history teaching (pp. 233–247). Manchester, England: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Jackson, D. (2009). Undergraduate management education: Its place, purpose and efforts to bridge the skills gap. Journal of Management and Organization, 15(2), 206–223.Google Scholar
Liu, N. F., & Carless, D. (2006). Peer feedback: The learning element of peer assessment. Teaching in Higher Education, 11(3), 279–290.Google Scholar
Liu, X. S., Kang, G. G., & Lilie, R. E. (2011). Negative perception of accounting, learning approach and learning outcome. Review of Business Research, 11(3), 114–120.Google Scholar
Lopez-Real, F., & Chan, Y.-P. R. (1999). Peer assessment of a group project in a primary mathematics education course. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 24(1), 67–79.Google Scholar
MacAlpine, J. M. K. (1999). Improving and encouraging peer assessment of student presentations. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 24(1), 15–25.Google Scholar
Marton, F., & Salijo, R. (1976a). On qualitative differences in learning: 1-Outcome and Process. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46, 4–11.Google Scholar
Marton, F., & Salijo, R. (1976b). On qualitative differences in learning: 2-Outcome as a function of the learner's conception of the task. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46, 115–127.Google Scholar
Marton, F., & Säliiö, R. (1984). The experience of learning. In Marton, F., Hounsell, D., & Entwistle, N. (Eds.), Approaches to learning (pp. 36–55). Edinburgh, Scotland: Scottish Academic Press.Google Scholar
Marton, F., & Salijo, R. (1997). Approaches to learning. In Marton, F., Hounsell, D. J., & Entwistle, N. J., (Eds.). The experience of learning: Implications for teaching and studying in higher education (2nd ed.). Edinburgh, Scotland: Scottish Academic Press.Google Scholar
Mathews, P. (2003). Academics as agents of change? Journal of Management and Organization, 9(1), 42–51.Google Scholar
Mauffette-Leenders, L. A., Erskine, J. A., & Leenders, M. R. (2007). Learning with cases (4th ed.). London, ONT: The University of Western Ontario, Richard Ivey School of Business, Ivey Publishing.Google Scholar
McDonald, P. (2010). Essay: Teaching the concept of management: Perspectives from ‘six honest serving men’. Journal of Management and Organization, 16(5), 626–640.Google Scholar
McKenna, R. J., & Williams, M. C. (1997). Paradigms and approaches to learning: Preparing for the third millennium. Journal of Management and Organization, 3(1), 30–50.Google Scholar
Mustoe, L. R., & Croft, A. C. (1999). Motivating engineering students by using modern case studies. European Journal of Engineering Education, 15(6), 469–476.Google Scholar
O'Shannassy, T., Kemp, S., & Booth, C. (2010). Case studies in MBA strategic management curriculum development from Australian universities. Journal of Management and Organization, 16(3), 467–480.Google Scholar
Ramsden, P. (1992/2003). Learning to teach in higher education. London, England: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ramsden, P. (1997). The context of learning in academic departments. In Marton, F., Hounsell, D. J., & Entwistle, N. J. (Eds.). The experience of learning (2nd ed., pp. 198–216). Edinburgh, Scotland: Scottish Academic Press.Google Scholar
Sadler, D. R. (1998). Formative assessment: Revising the territory. Assessment in Education, 5(1), 119–144.Google Scholar
Salter, D., Pang, M. Y. C., & Sharma, P. (2009). Active tasks to change the use of class time within an outcomes based approach to curriculum design. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 6(1), 1–38.Google Scholar
Selvarajah, C., Chelliah, J., Meyer, D., Pio, E., & Anurit, P. (2010). The impact of social motivation on cooperative learning and assessment preferences. Journal of Management and Organization, 16(1), 113–126.Google Scholar
Shepard, L. A. (2000). The role of assessment in a learning culture. Educational Researcher, 29(7), 4–14.Google Scholar
Sivan, A. (2000). The implementation of peer assessment: An action research approach. Assessment in Education, 17(2), 194–213.Google Scholar
Stefani, L. (1998). Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities. Review of Educational Research, 68(3), 249–276.Google Scholar
Svensson, L. (1977). On qualitative difference in learning: III – study skill and learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 47, 233–243.Google Scholar
Thomas, G., Martin, D., & Pleasants, K. (2011). Using self- and peer-assessment to enhance students' future-learning in higher education. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 8(1), 1–17.Google Scholar
von der Heidt, T., & Lamberton, G. (2011). Sustainability in the undergraduate and postgraduate business curriculum of a regional university: A critical perspective. Journal of Management and Organization, 17(5), 670–690.Google Scholar
Zutshi, S., Mitchell, M., & Weaver, D. (2011). Undergraduate student acceptance of a unit design for developing independent learning abilities. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 8(3), 1–16.Google Scholar