Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T19:09:27.177Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

‘Don’t mess with my company’: An exploratory study of commitment profiles before and after dramatic external events

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 February 2017

Luis M. Arciniega ,
Natalie J. Allen  and
Luis González
Luis M. Arciniega*
Affiliation:
Business Department, ITAM, Mexico City, Mexico
Natalie J. Allen
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
Luis González
Affiliation:
Department of Social Psychology and Anthropology, University of Salamanca, Spain
*
Corresponding author: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This panel study, conducted in a large Venezuelan organization, took advantage of a serendipitous opportunity to examine the organizational commitment profiles of employees before and after a series of dramatic, and unexpected, political events directed specifically at the organization. Two waves of organizational commitment data were collected, 6 months apart, from a sample of 152 employees. No evidence was found that employees’ continuance commitment to the organization was altered by the events described here. Interestingly, however, both affective and normative commitment increased significantly during the period of the study. Further, employee’s commitment profiles at Wave 2 were more differentiated than they were at Wave 1.

Keywords

organizational commitmentcommitment profilespanel study
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Management & Organization , Volume 24 , Issue 2 , March 2018 , pp. 224 - 238
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and Australian and New Zealand Academy of Management 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, N. J. (2010). Organizational commitment: An evidence-based challenge for healthcare organizations. In A. V. Ciurea, C. L. Cooper, & E. Avram (Eds.), Management of healthcare systems and organizations (pp. 361–376). Bucharest: Editura Universitaria Carol Davila.Google Scholar
Allen, N. J., & Meyer, J. P. (1990). The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.1990.tb00506.x.Google Scholar
Arciniega, L. M., & González, L. (2006). What is the influence of work values relative to other variables in the development of organizational commitment? Revista de Psicología Social, 21, 35–50. https://doi.org/10.1174/021347406775322269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brehm, S. S., & Brehm, J. W. (1981). Psychological reactance: A theory of freedom and control. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Brehm, J. W., Stires, L. K., Sensenig, J., & Shaban, J. (1966). Attractiveness of an eliminated choice alternative. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2, 301–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(66)90086-2.Google Scholar
Brunnstrom, D. (2012). Factbox: Venezuela’s nationalizations under Chavez. Retrieved October 27, 2015, from http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/10/08/us-venezuela-election-nationalizations-idUSBRE89701X20121008.Google Scholar
Byron, K., & Peterson, S. (2002). The impact of a large-scale traumatic event on individual and organizational outcomes: Exploring employee and company reactions to September 11, 2001. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23, 895–910. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chou, C. P., & Bentler, P. M. (1995). Estimates and tests in structural equation modeling. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equations modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 37–55). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Daniel, F. J. (2009a). Venezuela takes over tree farm of Irish company. Retrieved October 27, 2015, from http://www.reuters.com/article/2009/03/06/us-venezuela-chavez-smurfit-idUSTRE5253GH20090306.Google Scholar
Daniel, F. J. (2009b). Venezuela bans Coke Zero, cites ‘danger to health’. Retrieved October 27, 2015, from http://www.reuters.com/article/2009/06/11/usvenezuela-coke-idUSTRE5597K620090611.Google Scholar
The Economist (2009). Socialism in Venezuela feeding frenzy Statism on the march. Retrieved October 27, 2015, from http://www.economist.com/node/13278245.Google Scholar
Everitt, B. S., Landau, S., & Leese, M. (2001). Cluster analysis. London: Arnold Publishers.Google Scholar
Gellatly, I. R., Meyer, J. P., & Luchak, A. A. (2006). Combined effects of the three commitment components on focal and discretionary behaviors: A test of Meyer and Herscovitch’s propositions. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 69, 331–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2005.12.005.Google Scholar
Human Rights Watch (2012). Tightening the grip: Concentration and abuse of power in Chávez’s Venezuela. Retrieved October 27, 2015, from http://www.hrw.org/sites/default/files/reports/venezuela0712webwcover.pdf.Google Scholar
Hui, C. H., & Triandis, H. C. (1985). Measurement in cross-cultural psychology: A review and comparison of strategies. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 16, 131–152. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002185016002001.Google Scholar
Johns, G. (2006). The essential impact of context on organizational behavior. Academy of Management Review, 31, 386–408. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2006.20208687.Google Scholar
Joreskog, K. G. (1971). Simultaneous factor analysis in several populations. Psychometrika, 36, 409–426. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02291366.Google Scholar
Kabins, A., Xu, X., Bergman, M. E., Berry, C., & Wilson, V. L. (2016). A profile of profiles: A meta-analysis of the nomological net of commitment profiles. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101, 881–904. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000091.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kam, C., Morin, A. J. S., Meyer, J. P., & Topolnytsky, L. (2016). Are commitment profiles stable and predictable? A latent transition analysis. Journal of Management, 42, 1462–1490. DOI: 10.1177/0149206313503010Google Scholar
Kaufman, L., & Rousseeuw, P. J. (2005). Finding groups in data: An introduction to cluster analysis. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Kushnir, T., Fried, Y., & Malkinson, R. (2001). Work absence as a function of a national traumatic event: the case of Prime Minister Rabin’s assassination. Work & Stress, 15, 265–273. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678370110066553.Google Scholar
Laumer, S., Eckhardt, A., Maier, C., & Weitzel, T. (2011). The trend is our friend – German IT personnel’s perception of job-related factors before, during and after the economic downturn. Proceedings of the ACM SIGMIS-Computer Personnel Research Conference in San Antonio, TX, pp. 65–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1, 64–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/1053-4822(91)90011-Z.Google Scholar
Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1997). Commitment in the workplace: Theory, research, and application. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Meyer, J. P., Kam, C., Goldenberg, I., & Bremner, N. L. (2013). Organizational commitment in the military: Application of a profile approach. Military Psychology, 25, 381–401. https://doi.org/10.1037/mil0000007.Google Scholar
Meyer, J. P., Stanley, D. J., Herscovitch, L., & Topolnytsky, L. (2002). Affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization: A meta-analysis of antecedents, correlates and consequences. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 61, 20–52. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.2001.1842.Google Scholar
Meyer, J. P., Stanley, L. J., & Parfyonova, N. M. (2012). Employee commitment in context: The nature and implication of commitment profiles. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 80, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2011.07.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, J. P., Stanley, L. J., & Vandenberg, R. J. (2013). A person-centered approach to the study of commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 23, 190–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2012.07.007.Google Scholar
Ryan, A. M., West, B. J., & Carr, J. Z. (2003). Effects of the terrorist attacks of 9/11/01 on employee attitudes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 647–659. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.4.647.Google Scholar
Satorra, A., & Bentler, P. M. (1994). Corrections to test statistics and standard errors in covariance structure analysis. In A. von Eye, & C. C. Clogg (Eds.), Latent variables analysis: Applications for developmental research (pp. 399–419). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Vandenberg, R. J., & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3, 4–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/109442810031002.Google Scholar
Walter, M. (2009). Chavez orders Cargill plant takeover, threatens Polar. Retrieved October 27, 2015, from http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=aVC_Ym2jtHQM.Google Scholar
Wicklund, R. A. (1974). Freedom and reactance. Oxford: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Worchel, S., Andreoli, V., & Archer, R. (1976). When is a favor a threat to freedom: Effects of attribution and importance of freedom on reciprocity. Journal of Personality, 44, 294–310. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1976.tb00124.x.Google Scholar