Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T19:41:22.577Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Corporate social responsibility in sport: Stakeholder management in the UK football industry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 February 2015

Geoff Walters  and
Richard Tacon
Geoff Walters
Affiliation:
Department of Management, University of London, London, UK
Richard Tacon
Affiliation:
Department of Management, University of London, London, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Corporate social responsibility (CSR) has become increasingly significant for a wide range of organisations and for the managers that work within them. This is particularly true in the sport industry, where CSR is now an important area of focus for sport organisations, sport events and individual athletes. This article demonstrates how CSR can inform both theoretical debates and management practice within sport organisations. It does so by focusing on stakeholder theory, which overlaps considerably with CSR. In this article, stakeholder theory is used to examine three major CSR issues: stakeholder definition and salience, firm actions and responses, and stakeholder actions and responses. These three issues are considered in the context of the UK football industry. The article draws on 15 semi-structured qualitative interviews with senior representatives from a number of different organisations. These include the director of a large professional football club; a chief executive of a medium-sized professional football club in addition to the supporter-elected director; and the vice-chairman of a small professional football club. Additional interviews were undertaken with five representatives from national supporter organisations, two board members at two large supporter associations, two representatives from the Football League, one representative from the Independent Football Commission, and a prominent sports journalist. The analysis of the interview data illustrates ways in which CSR can be implemented by sport organisations through stakeholder management strategies. The article concludes that stakeholder theory has both conceptual and empirical value and can be used to illuminate key issues in sport management.

Keywords

corporate social responsibilitystakeholder theorystakeholder saliencestakeholder managementsport organisationsfootball
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Management & Organization , Volume 16 , Issue 4 , September 2010 , pp. 566 - 586
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and Australian and New Zealand Academy of Management 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agle, B. R., Mitchell, R. K., & Sonnenfeld, J. A. (1999). Who matters to CEOs? An investigation of stakeholder attributes and salience, corporate performance and CEO values. Academy of Management Journal, 42(5), 507–525.Google Scholar
Argenti, J. (1997). Stakeholders: The case against. Long Range Planning, 30(3), 442–445.Google Scholar
Babiak, K., & Wolfe, R. (2006). More than just a game? Corporate social responsibility and Super Bowl XL. Sport Marketing Quarterly, 15(4), 214–222.Google Scholar
Bale, J. (2000). The changing face of football: Stadiums and communities. In Garland, J., Malcolm, D., & Rowe, M. (Eds.), The future of football: Challenges for the twenty-first century (pp. 91–101). London: Frank Cass.Google Scholar
Bhattacharya, C. B., & Sen, S. (2004). Doing better at doing good. California Management Review, 47(1), 9–24.Google Scholar
Blowfield, M., & Murray, A. (2008). Corporate responsibility: A critical introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Breitbarth, T., & Harris, P. (2008). The role of corporate social responsibility in the football business: Towards the development of a conceptual model. European Sport Management Quarterly, 8(2), 179–206.Google Scholar
Brown, A., Crabbe, T., Mellor, G., Blackshaw, T., & Stone, C. (2006). Football and its communities: Final report. London: The Football Foundation.Google Scholar
Buysse, K., & Verbecke, A. (2003). Proactive environmental strategies: A stakeholder management perspective. Business & Society, 43(2), 162–195.Google Scholar
Caiger, A., & O'Leary, J. (1999). Towards a paradigm shift in professional football: The changing contours of business relationships in English football. Sport and the Law Journal, 7(2), 44–50.Google Scholar
Campbell, J. (2007). Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 946–967.Google Scholar
Cappato, A., & Pennazio, V. (2006). Corporate social responsibility in sport: Torino 2006 Olympic Winter Games. Turin: University of Turin.Google Scholar
Carroll, A. B. (1979). A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. Academy of Management Review, 4(4), 497–505.Google Scholar
Carroll, A. B. (1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organisational stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34(5), 39–48.Google Scholar
Carroll, A. B. (1999). Corporate social responsibility: Evolution of a definitional construct. Business and Society, 38(3), 268–295.Google Scholar
Choi, Y. R., & Shepard, D. A. (2005). Stakeholder perceptions of age and other dimensions of newness. Journal of Management, 31(4), 573–596.Google Scholar
Clarke, T. (1998). The stakeholder corporation: A business philosophy for the information age. Long Range Planning, 31(2), 182–194.Google Scholar
Clarke, T. (2004). Cycles of crisis and regulation: The enduring agency and stewardship problems of corporate governance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 12(2), 153–161.Google Scholar
Clarkson, M. B. E. (1995). A stakeholder framework of analysing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 92–117.Google Scholar
Coalter, F. (2007). A wider social role for sport: Who's keeping the score? London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Conn, D. (1997). Football business: Fair game in the '90s? Edinburgh: Mainstream.Google Scholar
Conn, D. (1999). The new commercialism. In Hamil, S., Michie, J., & Oughton, C. (Eds.), A game of two halves? The business of football (pp. 40–55). Edinburgh: Mainstream.Google Scholar
Conn, D. (2004). The beautiful game? Searching for the soul of football. London: Yellow Jersey Press.Google Scholar
Cordano, M., Frieze, I. H. & Ellis, K. M. (2004). Entangled affiliations and attitudes: An analysis of the influences on environmental policy stakeholders' behavioral intentions. Journal of Business Ethics, 49, 27–40.Google Scholar
Covell, D. (2005). Attachment, allegiance and a convergent application of stakeholder theory: Assessing the impact of winning on athletic donations in the Ivy League. Sport Marketing Quarterly, 14(3), 168–176.Google Scholar
Dean, D. H. (2003) Associating the cooperation with a charitable event through sponsorship: Measuring the effects on corporate-community relations. Journal of Advertising, 31(4), 77–88.Google Scholar
Denzin, N. K. (1970). The research act in sociology: A theoretical introduction to sociological method. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Department for Culture, Media and Sport. (2004). Bringing communities together through sport and culture. London: Department for Culture, Media and Sport.Google Scholar
Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 63–91.Google Scholar
Easterby-Smith, M., Thorpe, R., & Jackson, P. R. (2008). Management research (3rd ed.). Sage: London.Google Scholar
Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.Google Scholar
Freeman, R. E. (2006). The Wal-Mart effect and business, ethics and society. Academy of Management Perspectives, 20(3), 37–41.Google Scholar
Friedman, A. L., & Miles, S. V. (2002). Developing stakeholder theory. Journal of Management Studies, 39(1), 1–22.Google Scholar
Friedman, M. T., & Mason, D. S. (2004). A stakeholder approach to understanding economic decision making: Public subsidies for professional sport facilities. Economic Development Quarterly, 18(3), 236–254.Google Scholar
Friedman, M. T., Parent, M. M., & Mason, D. S. (2004). Building a framework for issues management in sport through stakeholder theory. European Sport Management Quarterly, 4(3), 170–190.Google Scholar
Frooman, J. (1999). Stakeholder influence strategies. Academy of Management Review, 24(2), 191–205.Google Scholar
Frooman, J., & Murrell, A. J. (2003). A logic for stakeholder behaviour: A test of stakeholder influence strategies. Best conference paper 2003 SIM: F1.Google Scholar
Gioia, D. (1999). Practicability, paradigms and problems in stakeholder theorizing. Academy of Management Review, 24(2), 228–232.Google Scholar
Giulianotti, R. (2002). Supporters, followers, fans and flâneurs: A taxonomy of spectator identities in football. Journal of Sport and Social Issues, 26(1), 25–46.Google Scholar
Godfrey, P., & Hatch, N. (2007). Researching corporate social responsibility: An agenda for the 21st century. Journal of Business Ethics, 70(1), 87–98.Google Scholar
Gorman, J., & Calhoun, K. (1994). The name of the game: The business of sports. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Hamil, S. (1999). A whole new ball game? Why football needs a regulator. In Hamil, S., Michie, J., & Oughton, C. (Eds.), A game of two halves? The business of football (pp. 23–39). Edinburgh: Mainstream.Google Scholar
Harrison, J. S., & Freeman, R. E. (1999). Stakeholders, social responsibility and performance: Empirical evidence and theoretical perspectives. Academy of Management Journal, 42(5), 479–487.Google Scholar
Hendry, J. R. (2005). Stakeholder influence strategies: An empirical exploration. Journal of Business Ethics, 61(1), 79–99.Google Scholar
Hirschmann, A. O. (1970). Exit, voice and loyalty: Responses to decline in firms, organizations and states. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hodder, I. (1998). The interpretation of documents and material culture. In Denzin, N. & Lincoln, Y. (Eds.), Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials (pp. 110–129). London: Sage.Google Scholar
Hosmer, L. T., & Kiewitz, C. K. (2005). Organisational justice: A behavioural science concept with critical implications for business ethics and stakeholder theory. Business Ethics Quarterly, 15(1), 67–91.Google Scholar
Huang, Y.-C., Ding, H.-B., & Kao, M.-R. (2009). Salient stakeholder voices: Family business and green innovation adoption. Journal of Management and Organization, 15(3), 309–327.Google Scholar
Jensen, M. C. (2002). Value maximization, stakeholder theory and the corporate objective function. Business Ethics Quarterly, 12(2), 235–256.Google Scholar
Johnstone, S., Southern, A., & Taylor, R. (2000). Midweek match: Premiership football and the urban economy. Local Economy, 15(3), 198–213.Google Scholar
Jones, T. M. (1995). Instrumental stakeholder theory: A synthesis of ethics and economics. Academy of Management Review, 20(2), 404–437.Google Scholar
Jones, T. M., Felps, W., & Bigley, G. A. (2007). Ethical theory and stakeholder related decisions: The role of stakeholder culture. Academy of Management Journal, 32(1), 137–155.Google Scholar
Jones, T. M., & Wicks, A. (1999). Convergent stakeholder theory. Academy of Management Review, 24(2), 206–221.Google Scholar
Jonker, J., & Marberg, A. (2007). Corporate social responsibility: Quo vadis? Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 27, 107–118.Google Scholar
Kott, A. (2005). The philanthropic power of sports. Foundation News and Commentary, 46(1), 20–25.Google Scholar
Kvale, S. (1996). InterViews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2009). InterViews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Laplume, A. O., Sonpar, K., & Litz, R. A. (2008). Stakeholder theory: Reviewing a theory that moves us. Journal of Management, 34(6), 1152–1189.Google Scholar
Leopkey, B., & Parent, M. M. (2009). Risk management issues in large-scale sporting events: A stakeholder perspective. European Sport Management Quarterly, 9(2), 187–208.Google Scholar
Lonsdale, C. (2004). Player power: Capturing value in the English football supply network. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 9(5), 383–391.Google Scholar
Low, C., & Cowton, C. (2004). Beyond stakeholder engagement: The challenges of stakeholder participation in corporate governance. International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics, 1(1), 45–55.Google Scholar
Maignan, I., & Ferrell, O. C. (2004). Corporate social responsibility and marketing: An integrative framework. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 32(1), 3–19.Google Scholar
Margolis, J., & Walsh, J. P. (2003). Misery loves companies: Rethinking social initiatives by business. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(2), 268–305.Google Scholar
McAlister, D. T., & Ferrell, L. (2002). The role of strategic philanthropy in marketing strategy. European Journal of Marketing, 36(5/6), 689–705.Google Scholar
McGuire, B., & Fenoglio, R. (2004). Football in the community: Resources and opportunities. Department of Exercise and Sport Science, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester.Google Scholar
Mellor, G. (2008). The Janus-faced sport: English football, community and the legacy of the ‘third way’. Soccer and Society, 9(3), 313–324.Google Scholar
Mitchell, R., Agle, B., & Wood, D. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853–866.Google Scholar
Morgan, M. (2002). Optimizing the structure of elite competitions in professional sport – Lessons from rugby union. Managing Leisure, 7(1), 41–60.Google Scholar
Morrow, S. (2003). The people's game? Football, finance and society. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Morrow, S., & Idle, C. (2008). Understanding change in professional road cycling. European Sport Management Quarterly, 8(4), 315–336.Google Scholar
Mullen, J. (1997) Performance-based corporate philanthropy: How “giving smart” can further corporate goals. Public Relations Quarterly, 42(2), 42–49.Google Scholar
Neville, B., & Menguc, B. (2006). Stakeholder multiplicity: Toward an understanding of interactions between stakeholders. Journal of Business Ethics, 66(4), 377–391.Google Scholar
Owen, D. (2005). CSR after Enron: A role for the academic accounting profession. Working Paper No 33, International Centre for Corporate Social Responsibility, University of Nottingham.Google Scholar
Parent, M. M., & Deephouse, D. L. (2007). A case study of stakeholder identification and prioritization by managers. Journal of Business Ethics, 75, 1–23.Google Scholar
Patton, M. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Pava, M. L., & Krausz, J. (1997). Criteria for evaluating the legitimacy of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 16(3), 337.Google Scholar
Perkins, S. (2000). Exploring future relationships between football clubs and local government. In Garland, J., Malcolm, D., & Rowe, M. (Eds.), The future of football: Challenges for the twenty-first century (pp. 102–113). London: Frank Cass.Google Scholar
Pfeffer, J., & Leong, A. (1977). Resource allocation in united funds: Examination of power and dependence. Administrative Science Quarterly, 18, 449–461.Google Scholar
Phillips, R. (1997). Stakeholder theory and a principle of fairness. Business Ethics Quarterly, 7(1), 51–46.Google Scholar
Phillips, R. (2003a). Stakeholder theory and organisational ethics. San Francisco: Berret-Koelher.Google Scholar
Phillips, R. (2003b). Stakeholder legitimacy. Business Ethics Quarterly, 13(1), 25–41.Google Scholar
Phillips, R., Freeman., R. E., & Wicks, A. (2003). What stakeholder theory is not. Business Ethics Quarterly, 13(4), 479–502.Google Scholar
Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2006). Strategy and society: The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 84(12), 78–92.Google Scholar
Post, J., Preston, L., & Sachs, S. (2002). Managing the extended enterprise: The new stakeholder view. California Management Review, 45(1), 6–28.Google Scholar
Putler, D. S., & Wolfe, R. A. (1999). Perceptions of intercollegiate athletic programmes: Priorities and tradeoffs. Sociology of Sport Journal, 16, 301–325.Google Scholar
Reed, D. (1999). Stakeholder management theory: A critical theory perspective. Business Ethics Quarterly, 9(3), 453–483.Google Scholar
Rowley, T. (1997). Moving beyond dyadic ties: A network theory of stakeholder influences. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 887–910.Google Scholar
Rowley, T. (2000). Does relational context matter? An empirical test of a network theory of stakeholder influences. In Logsdon, J., Wood, D., & Benson, L. (Eds.), Research in stakeholder theory, 1997-1998: The Sloan Foundation Minigrant Project (pp. 21–35). Clarkson Centre for Business Ethics, Toronto, Ontario.Google Scholar
Salomon Brothers, Toronto, Ontario. (1997). UK football clubs: Valuable assets? In Global Equity Research: Leisure. London: Salomon Brothers.Google Scholar
Sekaran, U. (2000). Research methods for business. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Senaux, B. (2008). A stakeholder approach to football club governance. International Journal of Sport Management and Marketing, 4(1/2), 4–17.Google Scholar
Silverman, D. (2001). Interpreting qualitative data: Methods for analysing talk, text and interaction. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Smith, A., & Westerbeek, H. (2007). Sport as a vehicle for deploying corporate social responsibility. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 25, 43–54.Google Scholar
Smith, V., & Langford, P. (2009). Evaluating the impact of corporate social responsibility programs on consumers. Journal of Organization and Management, 15(1), 97–109.Google Scholar
Sternberg, E. (1997). The defects of stakeholder theory. Corporate Governance, 5(1), 3–10.Google Scholar
Tapp, A. (2004). The loyalty of football fans – We'll support you evermore? Journal of Database Marketing and Customer Strategy Management, 11(3), 203–215.Google Scholar
Tapp, A., & Clowes, J. (2002). From carefree casuals to football anoraks: Segmentation possibilities for football supporters. European Journal of Marketing, 36(11), 1248–1269.Google Scholar
Trail, G., & Chelladurai, P. (2000). Perceptions of goals and processes of intercollegiate athletics: A case study. Journal of Sport Management, 14(2), 154–178.Google Scholar
Tsai, P. C. F., Yeh, C. R., Shu-Ling, W., & Ing-Chung, H. (2005). An empirical test of stakeholder influence strategy models: Evidence from business downsizing in Taiwan. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 16(10), 1862–1885.Google Scholar
Walters, G., & Chadwick, S. (2009). Corporate citizenship in football: Delivering strategic benefits through stakeholder engagement. Management Decision, 47(1), 51–66.Google Scholar
Winn, M. I. (2001). Building stakeholder theory with a decision modelling methodology. Business & Society, 40(2), 133–166.Google Scholar
Wolfe, R. A., & Putler, D. S. (2002). How tight are the ties that bind stakeholder groups? Organisation Science, 13(1), 64–80.Google Scholar
Wolfe, R. A., Weick, K. E., Usher, J. M., Terborg, J. R., Poppo, L., Murrell, A. J., et al. (2005). Sport and organisational studies: Exploring synergy. Journal of Management Inquiry, 14(2), 182–210.Google Scholar