Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T18:32:41.978Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Antecedents and consequences of co-opetition strategies in small and medium-sized accounting agencies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 February 2015

Hao-Chen Huang  and
Wenyi Chu
Hao-Chen Huang*
Affiliation:
Department of Wealth and Taxation Management, National Kaohsiung University of Applied Sciences, Kaohsiung City, Taiwan, ROC Department of Business Administration, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
Wenyi Chu
Affiliation:
Department of Business Administration, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC
*
Corresponding author: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

As the co-opetition strategy is frequently adopted by small and medium-sized accounting agencies, the main purpose of this study is to discuss the antecedents and impact of the adoption of the co-opetition strategy from the viewpoint of the resource-based theory. This study distributed questionnaires to CPAs (Certified Public Accountant) of small and medium-sized accounting agencies, and recovered 225 valid questionnaires for analysis. This study applied the confirmatory factor analysis to test the intrinsic quality of the measurement model, the structural equation modeling in testing the research hypotheses, and cluster analysis in distinguishing the co-opetition strategy types. The empirical results suggest that expertise heterogeneity positively affects competition strategy, and expertise complementarity positively affects the cooperation strategy. Finally, this study presents the resource and co-opetition strategy relationship matrix in order to provide small and medium-sized accounting agencies with reference for practical business operations.

Keywords

co-opetitionheterogeneitypartner trustresource-based viewresource complementarity
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Management & Organization , Volume 21 , Issue 6 , November 2015 , pp. 812 - 834
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and Australian and New Zealand Academy of Management 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Armstrong, J. S., & Overton, T. S. (1977). Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. Journal of Marketing Research, 14(3), 396–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Avolio, B., Yammarino, F. J., & Bass, B. M. (1991). Identifying common methods variance with data collected from a single source: An unresolved sticky issue. Journal of Management, 17(3), 571–587.Google Scholar
Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74–94.Google Scholar
Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120.Google Scholar
Baruch, Y., & Lin, C. P. (2012). All for one, one for all: Coopetition and virtual team performance. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 79(6), 1155–1168.Google Scholar
Bengtsson, M., & Kock, S. (2000). ‘Coopetition’ in business networks – to cooperate and compete simultaneously. Industrial Marketing Management, 29(5), 411–426.Google Scholar
Bentler, P. M., & Wu, E. J. C. (1993). EAS: Windows user’s guide. Los Angeles: BMDP Statistical Software.Google Scholar
Blau, P. (1997). Inequality and heterogeneity. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Bouncken, R. B., & Kraus, S. (2013). Innovation in knowledge-intensive industries: The double-edged sword of coopetition. Journal of Business Research, 66(10), 2060–2070.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandenburger, A. M., & Nalebuff, B. J. (1996). Co-opetition. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Chen, C. L. (2012). The effects of non-audit services on the value-relevance of accounting numbers: The role of auditor specialization. Actual Problems of Economics, 128, 450–459.Google Scholar
Chen, M. J., & Hambrick, D. C. (1995). Speed, stealth, and selective attack: How small firms differ from large firms in competitive behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 38(2), 453–482.Google Scholar
Chen, M. J., & MacMillan, I. C. (1992). Nonresponse and delayed response to competitive moves: The roles of competitor dependence and action irreversibility. Academy of Management Journal, 35(3), 539–570.Google Scholar
Chen, X., & Hao, G. (2013). Co-opetition alliance models of parallel flights for determining optimal overbooking policies. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 57(5–6), 1101–1111.Google Scholar
Child, J., & Faulkner, D. (1998). Strategies of co-operation: Managing alliances, networks, and joint ventures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chung, S., Singh, H., & Lee, K. (2000). Complementarity, status similarity and social capital as drivers of alliance formation. Strategic Management Journal, 21(1), 1–22.Google Scholar
Das, T. K., & Teng, B. S. (1998). Between trust and control: Developing confidence in partner cooperation in alliances. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 491–512.Google Scholar
Deitz, G. D., Tokman, M., Richey, R. G., & Morgan, R. M. (2010). Joint venture stability and cooperation: Direct, indirect and contingent effects of resource complementarity and trust. Industrial Marketing Management, 39(5), 862–873.Google Scholar
Dilman, D. A. (1978). Mail and telephone surveys: The total design method. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Dyer, J. H., & Chu, W. (2000). The determinants of trust in supplier-automaker relationships in the U.S., Japan, and Korea. Journal of International Business Studies, 31(2), 259–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dyer, J. H., & Chu, W. (2003). The role of trustworthiness in reducing transaction costs and improving performance: Empirical evidence from the United States, Japan, and Korea. Organization Science, 14(1), 57–68.Google Scholar
Dyer, J. H., & Singh, H. (1998). The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(4), 660–679.Google Scholar
Fang, E. (2011). The effect of strategic alliance knowledge complementarity on new product innovativeness in China. Organization Science, 22(1), 158–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferrier, W. J., Smith, K. G., & Grimm, C. M. (1999). The role of competitive action in market share erosion and industry dethronement: A study of industry leaders and challengers. Academy of Management Journal, 42(4), 372–388.Google Scholar
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable and measurement errors. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50.Google Scholar
Frankel, R. M., Johnson, M. F., & Nelson, K. K. (2002). The relation between auditors’ fees for non-audit services and earnings quality. The Accounting Review, 77(Supplement), 71–105.Google Scholar
Gambetta, D. G. (1988). Can we trust ?. In D. G. Gambetta (Ed.), Trust (pp. 131–185). New York: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Gnyawali, D. R., & Park, B. J. (2009). Co-opetition and technological innovation in small and medium-sized enterprises: A multilevel conceptual model. Journal of Small Business Management, 47(3), 308–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. The American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gulati, R. (1995). Does familiarity breed trust? The implications of repeated ties for contractual choice in alliances. Academy of Management Journal, 38(1), 85–112.Google Scholar
Hagedoorn, J., & Schakenraad, J. (1994). The effect of strategic technology alliances on company performance. Strategic Management Journal, 15(4), 291–309.Google Scholar
Harrison, J. S., Hitt, M. A., Hosjisson, R. E., & Ireland, R. D. (2001). Resource complementarity in business combinations: Extending the logic to organizational alliances. Journal of Management, 27(6), 679–690.Google Scholar
Helfat, C. E., & Peteraf, M. A. (2003). The dynamic resource-based view: Capability lifecycles. Strategic Management Journal, 24(10), 997–1010.Google Scholar
Higgins, M. C., & Gulati, R. (2003). Getting off to a good start: The effects of upper echelon affiliations on underwriter prestige. Organization Science, 14(3), 244–263.Google Scholar
Hitt, M. A., Bierman, L., Shimizu, K., & Kochhar, R. (2001). Direct and moderating effects of human capital on strategy and performance in professional service firms: A resource-based perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 44(1), 13–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, J., & Weiss, J. (2007). Simple rules for making alliances work. Harvard Business Review, 85(11), 122–131.Google ScholarPubMed
Hung, S. W., & Chang, C. C. (2012). A co-opetition perspective of technology alliance governance modes. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 24(7), 679–696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, G., & Scholes, K. (2002). Exploring corporate strategy (6th ed). England: Pearson Education Limited.Google Scholar
Joshi, A. W., & Stump, R. L. (1999). The contingent effect of specific asset investment on joint action in manufacturer-supplier relationships: An empirical test of the moderating role of reciprocal asset investments, uncertainty, and trust. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 27(3), 291–305.Google Scholar
Kenny, D., & Judd, C. M. (1984). Estimating the nonlinear and interactive effects of latent variables. Psychological Bulletin, 96, 201–210.Google Scholar
Kim, J. Y. J., & Finkelstein, S. (2009). The effects of strategic and market complementarity on acquisition performance: evidence from the U.S. commercial banking industry, 1989–2001. Strategic Management Journal, 30(6), 617–646.Google Scholar
Korgzynski, M. (2000). The political economy of trust. Journal of Management Studies, 37(1), 1–21.Google Scholar
Lado, A. A., Boyd, N. G., & Hanlon, S. C. (1997). Competition, cooperation, and the search for economic rents: A syncretic model. Academy of Management Review, 22(1), 110–141.Google Scholar
Lai, J. M., Lee, G. G., & Hsu, W. L. (2009). The influence of partner’s trust-commitment relationship on electronic commerce strategic planning. Management Decision, 47(3), 491–507.Google Scholar
Lambe, C. J., & Spekman, R. E. (1997). Alliances, external technology acquisition, and discontinuous technological change. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 14(2), 102–116.Google Scholar
Lambe, C. J., Spekman, R. E., & Hunt, S. D. (2002). Alliance competence, resources, and alliance success: Conceptualization, measurement, and initial test. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 30(2), 141–158.Google Scholar
Lane, J. P., Salk, J. E., & Lyles, M. A. (2001). Absorptive capacity, learning, and performance in international joint ventures. Strategic Management Journal, 22(12), 1139–1161.Google Scholar
Levy, M., Loebbecke, C., & Powell, P. (2003). SMEs, co-opetition and knowledge sharing: the role of information systems. European Journal of Information Systems, 12(1), 3–17.Google Scholar
Li, Y., Liu, Y., & Liu, H. (2011). Co-opetition, distributor’s entrepreneurial orientation and manufacturer’s knowledge acquisition: Evidence from China. Journal of Operations Management, 29(1-2), 128–142.Google Scholar
Lin, Z., Yang, H. B., & Arya, B. (2009). Alliance partners and firm performance: resource complementarity and status association. Strategic Management Journal, 30(9), 921–940.Google Scholar
Lui, S. S., Ngo, H. Y., & Hon, A. H. Y. (2006). Coercive strategy in interfirm cooperation: Mediating roles of interpersonal and interorganizational trust. Journal of Business Research, 59(4), 466–474.Google Scholar
Luo, Y. (2005). Toward coopetition within a multinational enterprise: A perspective from foreign subsidiaries. Journal of World Business, 40(1), 71–90.Google Scholar
Manolova, T. S., Gyoshev, B. S., & Manev, I. M. (2007). The role of interpersonal trust for entrepreneurial exchange in a transition economy. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 2(2), 107–122.Google Scholar
Mantena, R., & Saha, R. L. (2012). Co-opetition between differentiated platforms in two-sided markets. Journal of Management Information Systems, 29(2), 109–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Reviews, 20(3), 709–734.Google Scholar
Mcknight, D. H., & Chervany, N. L. (2002). What trust means in e-commerce customer relationships: An interdisciplinary conceptual typology. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 6(2), 35–59.Google Scholar
Michel, J. G., & Hambrick, D. C. (1992). Diversification posture and top management characteristics. Academy of Management Journal, 35(1), 9–37.Google Scholar
Mitra, S., & Hossain, M. (2007). Ownership composition and non-audit service fees. Journal of Business Research, 60(4), 348–356.Google Scholar
Morgan, R. T., & Hunt, S. D. (1994). The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing. Journal of Marketing, 58(3), 20–38.Google Scholar
Morris, M. H., Koçak, A., & Özer, A. (2007). Coopetition as a small business strategy: Implications for performance. Journal of Small Business Strategy, 18(1), 35–55.Google Scholar
Mossholder, K. W., Bennett, N., Kemery, E. R., & Wesolowski, M. A. (1998). Relationships between bases of power and work reactions: The mediational role of procedural justice. Journal of Management, 24(4), 533–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muthusamy, S. K., White, M. A., & Carr, A. (2007). An empirical examination of the role of social exchanges in alliance performance. Journal of Managerial Issues, 19(1), 53–76.Google Scholar
Newbert, S. L. (2007). Empirical research on the resource-based view of the firm: An assessment and suggestions for future research. Strategic Management Journal, 28(2), 121–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neter, J., Kutner, M. A., Nachtsheim, C. J., & Wasserman, W. (1996). Applied linear statistical models. Irwin: Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
Pellegrin-Boucher, E., Le Roy, F., & Gurau, C. (2013). Coopetitive strategies in the ICT sector: Typology and stability. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 25(1), 71–89.Google Scholar
Peng, T. J. A., & Bourne, M. (2009). The coexistence of competition and cooperation between networks: Implications from two Taiwanese healthcare networks. British Journal of Management, 20(3), 377–400.Google Scholar
Peng, T. J. A., Pike, S., Yang, J. C. H., & Roos, G. (2012). Is cooperation with competitors a good idea? An example in practice. British Journal of Management, 23(4), 532–560.Google Scholar
Peteraf, M. A. (1993). The cornerstones of competitive advantage: A resource-based view. Strategic Management Journal, 14(3), 179–191.Google Scholar
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903.Google Scholar
Podsakoff, P. M., & Organ, D. W. (1986). Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of Management, 12, 531–544.Google Scholar
Read, W. J., & Tomczyk, S. (1992). An examination of changes in scope of services performed by CPA firms. Accounting Horizons, 6(3), 42–51.Google Scholar
Ring, P. S., & Van de Ven, A. H. (1992). Structuring cooperative relationships between organizations. Strategic Management Journal, 13(7), 483–498.Google Scholar
Ritala, P. (2012). Coopetition strategy – When is it successful? Empirical evidence on innovation and market performance. British Journal of Management, 23(3), 307–324.Google Scholar
Robbins, H., & Finley, M. (1998). Transcompetition: Moving beyond competition and collaboration. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Rousseau, D. M., Sitkin, S. B., Burt, R. S., & Camerer, C. (1998). Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 393–404.Google Scholar
Sampson, R. C. (2005). Experience effects and collaborative returns in R&D alliances. Strategic Management Journal, 26(11), 1009–1031.Google Scholar
Sarker, M. B., Echambadi, R., Cavusgil, S. T., & Aulakh, P. S. (2001). The influence of complementarity, compatibility, and relationship capital on alliance performance. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 29(4), 358–373.Google Scholar
Scheiner, J. H., & Kiger, J. E. (1982). An empirical investigation of auditor involvement in nonaudit services. Journal of Accounting Research, 20(2), 482–496.Google Scholar
Sherer, P. D. (1995). Leveraging human assets in law firms: Human capital structures and organizational capabilities. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 48(4), 671–691.Google Scholar
Simonin, B. L. (1997). The importance of collaborative know-how: An empirical test of the learning organization. Academy of Management Journal, 40(5), 1150–1174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teng, H. C., & Huang, Y. F. (2013). The use for the competition theory of the industrial investment decisions – a case study of the Taiwan IC assembly industry. International Journal of Production Economics, 141(1), 335–338.Google Scholar
Tomlinson, P. R., & Fai, F. M. (2013). The nature of SME co-operation and innovation: A multi-scalar and multi-dimensional analysis. International Journal of Production Economics, 141(1), 316–326.Google Scholar
Tsai, W. (2000). Social capital, strategic relatedness and the formation of intra-organizational linkages. Strategic Management Journal, 21(9), 925–939.Google Scholar
Wernerfelt, B., & Karnani, A. (1987). Competitive strategy under uncertainty. Strategic Management Journal, 8(2), 187–194.Google Scholar
Williamson, O. E., & Craswell, R. (1993). Calculativeness, trust and economic organization. Journal of Law and Economics, 36, 453–486.Google Scholar
Wu, Z. H., Choi, T. Y., & Rungtusanatham, M. J. (2010). Supplier-supplier relationships in buyer-supplier-supplier triads: Implications for supplier performance. Journal of Operations Management, 28(2), 115–123.Google Scholar
Zaheer, A., McEvily, B., & Perrone, V. (1998). Does trust matter? Exploring the effects of interorganizational and interpersonal trust on performance. Organization Science, 9(2), 141–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaheer, A., & Venkatraman, N. (1995). Relational governance as an interorganizational strategy: An empirical test of the role of trust in economic exchange? Strategic Management Journal, 16(5), 373–392.Google Scholar