No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Unmasking re-regulation in the luxury hotel sector
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 February 2015
Abstract
The pursuit of regulatory reform in order to enhance organisational flexibility and efficiency appears to be ongoing in Australia. This is particularly salient in the service sector, where competition is strong and operating hours are often extended. In responding to these issues, government has sought to provide both employers and employees with additional regulatory options to better suit their individual needs; thereby offering what might be termed ‘regulatory choice’. While employers, on average, have engaged in these alternate forms of agreement making, those within the hospitality industry have been less enthusiastic about bargaining outside of the award system. The reasons for their reluctance have not been examined in depth, however. This paper therefore seeks to analyse the factors underpinning employers' bargaining decisions in order to develop a greater understanding of regulatory choice in Australian service sector firms. In doing so, the analysis focuses on employers' bargaining arrangements in the Australian luxury hotel sector. The findings indicate that regulatory choice is influenced by four primary factors: business/human resource management strategy; workplace characteristics; finances and perceived risk; and administrative issues. Contrary to the government's endeavours to enhance flexibility, some employers ‘choice’ of employment regulation was restricted. Regulatory choice appears to be significantly more complex than anticipated.
Keywords
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press and Australian and New Zealand Academy of Management 2007
References
Alexander, R (2006) Understanding Australian industrial relations (6th edn) WorkChoices update. Melbourne: Thomson.Google Scholar
Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) (2000) Employee earnings and hours. Cat No. 6306.0. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service (AGPS).Google Scholar
Australian Government. (2005) Work Choices: A simpler, fairer national workplace relations system for Australia. Canberra: AGPS.Google Scholar
Buultjens, J and Howard, D (2001) Labour flexibility in the hospitality industry: Questioning the relevance of deregulation. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management 13: 60–70.Google Scholar
Buultjens, J and Luckie, K (1997) ‘Flexibility in the hospitality industry: Is deregulation necessary?’ Paper presented to the 11thAIRAANZ Conference, Brisbane QLD, 30 01–1 Feb.Google Scholar
Commerce Queensland (2005) Workplace relations reform: Sorting fact from fiction. http://www.commerceqld.com.au/www/index.cfm?ItemIE=197Google Scholar
Department of Employment and Workplace Relations and the Office of the Employment Advocate (DEWR and OEA) (2004; Agreement making in Australia under the Workplace Relations Act: 2002 and 2003. Canberra: AGPS.Google Scholar
Department of Industrial Relations (DIR) (1989) Award restructuring: the task ahead. Canberra: AGPS.Google Scholar
Ellem, B, Baird, M, Cooper, R and Lansbury, R (2005) ‘Work Choices’: Mythmaking at work. Journal of Australian Political Economy 56: 13–31.Google Scholar
Hall, R (2006) Australian industrial relations in 2005 – The WorkChoices revolution. Journal of Industrial Relations 48: 291–303.Google Scholar
Holstein, J and Gubrium, J (1997) Active interviewing, in: Silverman, D (ed.) Qualitative research: Theory, method and practice. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Hort, L and Timo, N (2001) ‘Missing in action? A decade of HRM and enterprise bargaining in the Australian hotel industry’. Paper presented at the Ten Years of Enterprise Bargaining Conference, Newcastle NSW, 3–4 05.Google Scholar
Knox, A (2006) The differential effects of regulatory reform: Evidence from the Australian luxury hotel industry. Journal of Industrial Relations 48: 453–474.Google Scholar
Office of the Employment Advocate (OEA) (2006) OEA research and statistics, employee coverage. http://oea.gov.au/graphics.asp?showdoc=/news/researchStatistics.aspGoogle Scholar
Patton, M (1990) Qualitative evaluation and research methods. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Sheldon, P and Thornthwaite, L (1999) Employer Matters in (1998) Journal of Industrial Relations 41: 152–169.Google Scholar
Timo, N (1999) Contingent and retentive employment in the Australian hotel industry: Reformulating the core-periphery model. Australian Journal of Labour Economics 3: 47–64.Google Scholar
Timo, N and Davidson, M (1999) Flexible labour and human resource practices in small- to medium-sized enterprises: The case of the hotel and tourism industry in Australia, in: Lee-Ross, D (ed.) HRM in tourism and hospitality: International Perspective on small- to medium-sized enterprises. London: Cassell.Google Scholar
van Barneveld, K (2004) Equity and efficiency: The Case of Australian Workplace Agreements, Unpublished PhD Thesis, University of Newcastle.Google Scholar
van Barneveld, K (2006) Hospitality, in: Waring, P and Bray, M (eds) Evolving employment relations: Industry studies from Australia. Sydney: McGraw-Hill Irwin.Google Scholar
Waring, P, Ostenfeld, S and Bray, M (2004) Award Pull' in the hospitality industry. Paper presented at AIRAANZ Conference, Noosa, 4–6 02.Google Scholar
White, N and Bray, M (2005) The processes of workplace change for nurses in NSW public hospitals, in: Stanton, P, Willis, E and Young, S (Eds) Workplace reform in the healthcare industry: The Australian Experience. Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar