Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T15:30:04.595Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Managing intensity in knowledge work: Self-leadership practices among Danish management consultants

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 October 2018

Gisela Bäcklander Open the ORCID record for Gisela Bäcklander [Opens in a new window] ,
Calle Rosengren  and
Matti Kaulio
Gisela Bäcklander*
Affiliation:
Department of Industrial Economics and Management, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden
Calle Rosengren
Affiliation:
Faculty of Engineering, Department of Design Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
Matti Kaulio
Affiliation:
Department of Industrial Economics and Management, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper examines the sources of knowledge workers’ work intensity and the self-leading strategies they apply to deal with it. The paper is based on focus group interviews with management consultants in a Danish management consultancy firm. Work intensity was identified as resulting from a combination of: (1) a results-only focus, (2) vagueness, (3) boundaryless work, and (4) low control of the quantitative load. A framework for self-leading strategies is developed based on the dimensions of reactive/proactive and self-focused/externally focused strategies in different combinations. The results indicate that while consultants expressed a belief in internal self-discipline strategies of a more reactive nature, in fact, external and proactive strategies were the most effective in practice. In conclusion, the paper contributes to an extension of self-leadership theory to better account for current research on self-control.

Keywords

management consultingself-leadershipknowledge-intensive workwork intensity
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Management & Organization , Volume 27 , Issue 2 , March 2021 , pp. 342 - 360
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and Australian and New Zealand Academy of Management 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allvin, M., Aronsson, G., Hagström, T., Johansson, G., & Lundberg, U. (2006). Gränslöst arbete: Socialpsykologiska perspektiv på det nya arbetslivet. Stockholm: Liber.Google Scholar
Allvin, M., Mellner, C., Movitz, F., & Aronsson, G. (2013). The diffusion of flexibility: Estimating the incidence of low-regulated working conditions. Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies, 3, 99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alvesson, M. (2001). Knowledge work: Ambiguity, image and identity. Human Relations, 54, 863–886.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alvesson, M. (2004). Knowledge work and knowledge-intensive firms. Oxford, UK: OUP.Google Scholar
American Psychological Association (2012). Stress by Generation [Press release]. Retrieved from http://www.apa.org/news/press/releases/stress/2012/generation.pdf.Google Scholar
Baehler, K., & Bryson, J. (2009). Behind the Beehive buzz: Sources of occupational stress for New Zealand policy officials. Kōtuitui: New Zealand Journal of Social Sciences Online, 4, 5–23.Google Scholar
Baumeister, R. F., Bratslavsky, E., Muraven, M., & Tice, D. M. (1998). Ego depletion: Is the active self a limited resource? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1252–1265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumeister, R. F., Tice, D. M., & Vohs, K. D. (2018). The strength model of self-regulation: Conclusions from the second decade of willpower research. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13, 141–145.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Borg, V., Andersen Nexø, M., Kolte, I. V., & Friis Andersen, M. (2010). Hvidbog om mentalt helbred, sygefravær og tilbagevenden til arbejde [White paper about mental health, sickness leave, and returning to work]. Retrieved from http://www.arbejdsmiljoforskning.dk/~/media/Boeger-og-rapporter/hvidbog-mentalt-helbred.pdf.Google Scholar
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bryman, A., & Burgess, B. (2002). Analyzing qualitative data. New York, NY: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cannizzo, F., & Osbaldiston, N. (2016). Academic work/life balance: A brief quantitative analysis of the Australian experience. Journal of Sociology, 52, 890–906.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davenport, T. H. (2005). Thinking for a living: How to get better performances and results from knowledge workers. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press.Google Scholar
Drucker, P. F. (1999). Knowledge-worker productivity: The biggest challenge. California Management Review, 41, 79–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duckworth, A. L., Gendler, T. S., & Gross, J. J. (2016). Situational strategies for self-control. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11, 35–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Edgar, F., Gray, B., Browning, V., & Dwyer, K. (2014). Cultural drivers of high performing knowledge-intensive service organisations. Journal of Management & Organization, 20, 56–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14, 532–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engelbrecht, H.-J. (2000). Towards a knowledge economy? Changes in New Zealand’s information work force 1976–1996. Prometheus, 18, 265–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ent, M. R., Baumeister, R. F., & Tice, D. M. (2015). Trait self-control and the avoidance of temptation. Personality and Individual Differences, 74, 12–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eurostat (2018). Employment in knowledge intensive activities (KIA) as % of total employment. Research and Innovation Observatory. Retrieved April 12, 2018, from https://rio.jrc.ec.europa.eu/en/stats/employment-knowledge-intensive-activities-kia-total-employment.Google Scholar
Finch, H., Lewis, J., & Turley, C. (2014). Focus groups. In J. Ritchie, J. Lewis, C. M. Nicholls, & R. Ormston (Eds.,) Qualitative Research Practice: A Guide for Social Science Students and Researchers (2nd ed.). London: Sage.Google Scholar
Fincham, R., & Clark, T. (2002). Preface: Management consultancy: Issues, perspectives, and agendas. International Studies of Management & Organization, 32(4), 3–18.Google Scholar
Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12, 219–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Försäkringskassan (2017). Psykisk ohälsa bakom nästan hälften av alla pågående sjukskrivningar [Mental unhealth behind almost half of ongoing sick leaves] [Press release]. Retrieved from https://www.forsakringskassan.se/!ut/p/z0/LcixCoAgEIDhZ2lwjFMagjbfQlziyKMkPY8Ue_0cmn6-Hzw48Iw9nthiYUzD7j3yJtguZRar9FG4EbdK-0NVCtfYSWkZqH8yhUAJORCPk2ezGm00yG2nD7-QCkQ!/.Google Scholar
Fujita, K. (2011). On conceptualizing self-control as more than the effortful inhibition of impulses. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 15, 352–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grant, A. M., Fried, Y., & Juillerat, T. (2010). Work matters: Job design in classic and contemporary perspectives. In S. Zedeck (Ed.,) APA Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (pp. 417–453). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Grant, A. M., & Parker, S. K. (2009). 7 Redesigning work design theories: The rise of relational and proactive perspectives. Academy of Management Annals, 3, 317–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gross, J. J., & Thompson, R. A. (2007). Emotion regulation: Conceptual foundations. In J. J. Gross (Ed.,) Handbook of Emotion Regulation (pp. 3–24). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Hackman, J. R. (2009). The perils of positivity. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30, 309–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hagger, M. S., Wood, C., Stiff, C., & Chatzisarantis, N. L. D. (2010). Ego depletion and the strength model of self-control: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 495–525.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hanson, M. (2004). Det flexibla arbetets villkor-om självförvaltandets kompetens. Stockholm: Arbetslivsinstitutet.Google Scholar
Hatchuel, A. (2002). Sources of intensity in work organizations. In J. Forslin, P. Docherty, & A. B. Shani (Eds.,) Creating Sustainable Work Systems (1st ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hays (2016). New Zealand’s most wanted: knowledge workers in growing demand. Retrieved from https://www.hays.net.nz/press-releases/HAYS_1378849.Google Scholar
Health and Safety Executive (2017). Work-related stress, depression or anxiety statistics in Great Britain 2017. Retrieved from http://www.hse.gov.uk/statistics/causdis/stress/stress.pdf.Google Scholar
Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Hofstede Insights (2017). Retrieved from https://www.hofstede-insights.com/country-comparison/denmark/.Google Scholar
Holmberg, I., & Tyrstrup, M. (2010). Well then – What now? An everyday approach to managerial leadership. Leadership, 6, 353–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ipsen, C., & Jensen, P. L. (2010). Causes of work-related stress and individual strategies in knowledge work. DTU Management Engineering. Department of Management Engineering-The Technical University of Denmark. Lyngby, Denmark, pp. 1–32.Google Scholar
Jensen, S. H., Poulfelt, F., & Kraus, S. (2010). Managerial routines in professional service firms: Transforming knowledge into competitive advantages. The Service Industries Journal, 30, 2045–2062.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joo, B.-K., & Lim, T. (2009). The effects of organizational learning culture, perceived job complexity, and proactive personality on organizational commitment and intrinsic motivation. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 16, 48–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, S., & Berman, M. G. (2010). Directed attention as a common resource for executive functioning and self-regulation. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5, 43–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kerr, S., & Jermier, J. M. (1978). Substitutes for leadership: Their meaning and measurement. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 22, 375–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kira, M., & Forslin, J. (2008). Seeking regenerative work in the post‐bureaucratic transition. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 21, 76–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitay, J., & Wright, C. (2003). Expertise and organizational boundaries: The varying roles of Australian management consultants. Asia Pacific Business Review, 9, 21–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitzinger, J. (1994). The methodology of focus groups: The importance of interaction between research participants. Sociology of Health & Illness, 16, 103–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lupu, I., & Empson, L. (2015). Illusio and overwork: Playing the game in the accounting field. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 28, 1310–1340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Løwendahl, B. R., Revang, Ø., & Fosstenløkken, S. M. (2001). Knowledge and value creation in professional service firms: A framework for analysis. Human Relations, 54, 911–931.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Makani, J., & Marche, S. (2012). Classifying organizations by knowledge intensity – necessary next‐steps. Journal of Knowledge Management, 16, 243–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manca, C., Grijalvo, M., Palacios, M., & Kaulio, M. (2018). Collaborative workplaces for innovation in service companies: barriers and enablers for supporting new ways of working. Service Business.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manz, C. C. (1986). Self-leadership: Toward an expanded theory of self-influence processes in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 11, 585–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manz, C. C. (2015). Taking the self-leadership high road: Smooth surface or potholes ahead? Academy of Management Perspectives, 29, 132–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manz, C. C., & Sims, H. P. (1980). Self-management as a substitute for leadership: A social learning theory perspective. Academy of Management Review, 5, 361–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manz, C. C., & Sims, H. P. (2001). The new superleadership: Leading others to lead themselves. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.Google Scholar
Mazmanian, M., Orlikowski, W. J., & Yates, J. (2013). The autonomy paradox: The implications of mobile email devices for knowledge professionals. Organization Science, 24, 1337–1357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michel, A. (2014). Participation and self‐entrapment: A 12‐year ethnography of Wall Street participation practices’ diffusion and evolving consequences. The Sociological Quarterly, 55, 514–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miles, I. (2005). Knowledge intensive business services: prospects and policies. Foresight, 7, 39–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mohrman, S. A., Cohen, S. G., & Morhman, A. M. Jr (1995). Designing team-based organizations: New forms for knowledge work. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Montalvo, C., & Giessen, A. (2012). Sectoral Innovation Watch 2008-2011: Final Synthesis Report. Retrieved from https://dx.doi.org/10.13140/2.1.2707.7446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muhr, S. L., Pedersen, M., & Alvesson, M. (2012). Workload, aspiration, and fun: Problems of balancing self-exploitation and self-exploration in work life. In Managing ‘Human Resources’ by Exploiting and Exploring People’s Potentials (pp. 193–220). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller, T., & Niessen, C. (2018). Self-leadership and self-control strength in the work context. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 33, 74–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neck, C. P., Houghton, J. D., Sardeshmukh, S. R., Goldsby, M., & Godwin, J. L. (2013). Self-leadership: A cognitive resource for entrepreneurs. Journal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship, 26, 463–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, S. K. (2014). Beyond motivation: Job and work design for development, health, ambidexterity, and more. Annual Review of Psychology, 65, 661–691.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pérez-Zapata, O., Pascual, A. S., Álvarez-Hernández, G., & Collado, C. C. (2016). Knowledge work intensification and self-management: The autonomy paradox. Work Organisation, Labour and Globalisation, 10, 27–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piercy, F. P., & Thomas, V. (1998). Participatory evaluation research: An introduction for family therapists. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 24, 165–176.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Politis, J. D. (2006). Self‐leadership behavioural‐focused strategies and team performance. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 27, 203–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Safe Work Australia (2015). Work-related mental disorders profile. Retrieved from https://www.safeworkaustralia.gov.au/system/files/documents/1702/work-related-mental-disorders-profile.pdf.Google Scholar
Schmeichel, B. J., Vohs, K. D., & Baumeister, R. F. (2003). Intellectual performance and ego depletion: Role of the self in logical reasoning and other information processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 33–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schnall, P. L., Dobson, M., Rosskam, E., & Elling, R. H. (2018). Unhealthy work: Causes, consequences, cures (1st ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sjåstad, H., & Baumeister, R. F. (2018). The future and the will: Planning requires self-control, and ego depletion leads to planning aversion. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 76, 127–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smithson, J. (2006). Using focus groups to study work and family. In M. Pitt-Catsouphes, E. E. Kossek, & S. Sweet (Eds.,) The Work and Family Handbook: Multi-disciplinary Perspectives and Approaches (pp. 435–450). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Starbuck, W. H. (1992). Learning by knowledge-intensive firms. Journal of Management Studies, 29, 713–740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart, G. L., Courtright, S. H., & Manz, C. C. (2011). Self-leadership: A multilevel review. Journal of Management, 37, 185–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart, D. W., & Shamdasani, P. N. (2015). Focus groups: Theory and practice. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Strauss, A. L. (1987). Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientist. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Unsworth, K. L., & Mason, C. M. (2012). Help yourself: The mechanisms through which a self-leadership intervention influences strain. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 17, 235–245.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van Knippenberg, D., Dahlander, L., Haas, M. R., & George, G. (2015). Information, attention, and decision making. Academy of Management Journal, 58, 649–657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vinnova (2011). Utveckling av Sveriges kunskapsintensiva innovationssystem [Development of knowledge intensive innovation systems in Sweden]. Retrieved from https://www.vinnova.se/contentassets/c443161f86184f4aa0448d8b49dd5e36/vp-11-04.pdf.Google Scholar
Vohs, K. D., Baumeister, R. F., Schmeichel, B. J., Twenge, J. M., Nelson, N. M., & Tice, D. M. (2008). Making choices impairs subsequent self-control: A limited-resource account of decision making, self-regulation, and active initiative. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 883–898.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wei, H. (2004). Measuring the stock of human capital for Australia. Australian Bureau of Statistics Research Paper (ABS Catalogue No. 1351.0. 55.001).Google Scholar
Werr, A., & Styhre, A. (2002). Management consultants-friend or foe? Understanding the ambiguous client–consultant relationship. International Studies of Management & Organization, 32, 43–66.Google Scholar
Wojdylo, K., Baumann, N., & Kuhl, J. (2017). The firepower of work craving: When self-control is burning under the rubble of self-regulation. PLoS One, 12, e0169729.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wright, R. A., Stewart, C. C., & Barnett, B. R. (2008). Mental fatigue influence on effort-related cardiovascular response: Extension across the regulatory (inhibitory)/non-regulatory performance dimension. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 69, 127–133.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wrzesniewski, A., & Dutton, J. E. (2001). Crafting a job: Revisioning employees as active crafters of their work.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yin, R. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar