Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T22:56:08.641Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Exploring the Foucauldian interpretation of power and subject in organizations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 February 2015

Anita Välikangas  and
Hannele Seeck
Anita Välikangas
Affiliation:
Department of Political and Economic Studies, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
Hannele Seeck
Affiliation:
Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Helsinki, Finland; London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper assesses the recent contribution of Michel Foucault to the study of power and subject in organizations. First, we theoretically examine Foucault's thinking by dividing his works into archaeological, genealogical and aesthetic/ethical phases. We then conduct a review of 113 international journal articles from between the years 2000 and 2009. We do this in order to obtain an overview of the phases of Foucault's thinking that are prevalent in recent organization studies. We find that recent academic studies drawing on Foucault are increasingly leaning towards Foucault's writings on governmentality, as well as on his genealogical works, which have sustained their popularity. Reflecting the growing interest in governmentality and genealogy, we end by pointing out some avenues for future research.

Keywords

Foucaultpowersubjectorganizationsmanagement
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Management & Organization , Volume 17 , Issue 6: 25th ANZAM Anniversary Edition Remembering 2011: Managing for the Human Spirit , November 2011 , pp. 812 - 827
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and Australian and New Zealand Academy of Management 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, A. (2000). The anti-subjective hypothesis: Michel Foucault and the death of the subject. The Philosophical Forum, 16(2), 113–130.Google Scholar
Alvesson, M., & Deetz, S. (2000). Doing critical management research. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Alvesson, M., & Willmott, H. (Eds.). (2003). Studying management critically. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Baistow, K. (1995). Liberation and regulation? Some paradoxes of empowerment. Critical Social Policy, 14(42), 34–46.Google Scholar
Banerjee, B. B., Carter, C, & Clegg, S. (2009). Managing globalization. In Alvesson, M., Bridgman, T., & Willmott, H. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of critical management studies (pp. 186–212). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Barratt, E. (2004). Foucault and the politics of critical management studies. Culture & Organization, 10(3), 191–202.Google Scholar
Bell, V. (1993). Governing childhood. Economy and Society, 22(3), 390–405.Google Scholar
Bergström, O., Hasselbladh, H., & Karreman, D. (2009). Organizing disciplinary power in a knowledge organization. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 25(2), 178–190.Google Scholar
Bergström, O., & Knights, D. (2006). Organizational discourse and subjectivity: Subjectification during processes of recruitment. Human Relations, 59(3), 351–377.Google Scholar
Burchell, G., Colin, G., & Miller, P. (Eds.). (1991). The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Burrell, G. (1988). Modernism, postmodernism and organizational analysis 2: The contribution of Michel Foucault. Organization Studies, 9(2), 221–235.Google Scholar
Burrell, G. (1992). The organization of pleasure. In Alvesson, M. & Willmott, H. (Eds.), Critical management studies (pp. 165–183). London: Sage.Google Scholar
Burrell, G. (2000). Twentieth-century quadrilles: Aristocracy, owners, managers and professionals. International Studies of Management and Organization, 32(2), 25–50.Google Scholar
Caldwell, R. (2007). Agency and change: Re-evaluating Foucault's legacy. Organization, 14(6), 769–792.Google Scholar
Caluya, G. (2010). The post-panoptic society? Reassessing Foucault in surveillance studies. Social Identities: Journal for the Study of Race, Nation and Culture, 16(5), 621–633.Google Scholar
Carter, C. (2008). A curiously British story: Foucault goes to business school. International Studies of Management and Organization, 35(1), 13–29.Google Scholar
Carter, C., McKinlay, A., & Rowlinson, M. (2002). Foucault, management and history. Organization, 9(4), 515–526.Google Scholar
Casey, C. (2002). Critical analysis of organizations: Theory, practice, revitalization. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Casey, C. (2004). Bureaucracy re-enchanted? Spirit, experts and authority in organizations. Organization, 11(1), 59–79.Google Scholar
Castel, R., Castel, F., & Lovell, A. (1982). The psychiatric society. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Castells, M. (1997). The power of identity, the information age: Economy, society and culture (Vol. 2). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Chan, A., & Clegg, S. (2002). History, culture and organization studies. Culture and Organization, 8(4), 259–273.Google Scholar
Clegg, S. (2000). Discourses of power: From Hobbes to Foucault. Theory, culture & society, 17(6), 139–147.Google Scholar
Clegg, S., Courpasson, D., & Phillips, N. (2006). Power and organizations. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Clegg, S., Kornberger, M., & Rhodes, C. (2007). Business ethics as practice. British Journal of Management, 18(2), 107–122.Google Scholar
Collinson, D. (1992). Managing the shopfloor: Subjectivity, masculinity and workplace culture. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Cooper, R., & Burrell, G. (1988). Modernism, postmodernism and organizational analysis: An introduction. Organizational Studies, 9(1), 91–112.Google Scholar
Crane, A., Knights, D., & Starkey, K. (2008). The conditions of our freedom: Foucault, organization, and ethics. Business Ethics Quarterly, 18(3), 299–320.Google Scholar
Dale, K., & Burrell, G. (2008). The spaces of organization and the organization of space: Power, identity and materiality at work. London: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Dalgliesh, B. (2009). Foucault and creative resistance in organizations. Society and Business Review, 4(1), 45–57.Google Scholar
Dean, M. (1991). The constitution of poverty. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Dean, M. (1999). Governmentality: Power and rule in modern society. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Defert, D. (1991). Popular life and insurance technology. In Burchell, G., Gordon, C., & Miller, P. (Eds.), The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality (pp. 211–234). Hemel Hempstead, UK: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
Dick, P., & Cassell, C. (2002). Barriers to managing diversity in a UK constabulary: The role of discourse. Journal of Management Studies, 39, 953–976.Google Scholar
Dreyfus, H. L. (1999). Heidegger and Foucault on the subject, agency and practices. International Journal of Philosophical Studies, 4(1), 1–16.Google Scholar
Eiden, S. (2005). The problem of confession: The productive failure of Foucault's history of sexuality. Journal for Cultural Research, 9(1), 23–41.Google Scholar
Ewald, F. (1986). L'État providence. Paris: Grasset.Google Scholar
Ezzamel, M., & Willmott, H. (2008). Strategy as discourse in a global retailer: A supplement to rationalist and interpretive accounts. Organization Studies, 29(2), 191–217.Google Scholar
Feldman, S. P. (1997). The revolt against cultural authority: Power/Knowledge as an assumption in organization theory. Human Relations, 50(8), 931–955.Google Scholar
Forbat, L., Maguire, R., McCann, L., Illingworth, N., & Kearney, N. (2009). The use of technology in cancer care: Applying Foucault's ideas to explore the changing dynamics of power in health care. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 65(2), 306–315.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1970). The Birth of the clinic: An archeology of medical perception. Translated by Sheridan-Smith, A. M.. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1980). Power/Knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings 1972-1977. In Gordon, Colin (Eds.). London: Harvester.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1981). The history of sexuality, vol. 1, The will to knowledge. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1989). Power affects the body. In Foucault, M. (Ed.), Foucault live: Interviews 1961-1984. New York: Semiotext(e).Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1990). The history of sexuality, vol. 3, The care of the self. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1992). The history of sexuality, vol. 2, The use of pleasure. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1997a). On genealogy and ethics: An overview of a work in progress. In: Foucault, M. & Rabinow, P. D. (Eds.), Ethics: Subjectivity and truth (essential works of Foucault 1954-1984; Vol. 1, pp. 253–280). New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1997b). Technologies of the self. In: Foucault, M. & Rabinow, P. D. (Eds.), Ethics: Subjectivity and truth (essential works of Foucault 1954-1984; Vol. 1, pp. 223–252). New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1997c). The ethics of the concern for self as a practice of freedom. In: Foucault, M. & Rabinow, P. D. (Eds.), Ethics: Subjectivity and truth (essential works of Foucault 1954-1984; Vol. 1, pp. 281–302). New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (2000a). Interview with Michel Foucault. In Foucault, M. & Faubion, J. D. (Eds.), Power (essential works of Foucault 1954-1984; Vol. 3, pp. 239–297). New York: The New Press.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (2000b). Questions of method. In Foucault, M. & Faubion, J. D. (Eds.), Power (essential works of Foucault 1954-1984; Vol. 3, pp. 221–238). New York: The New Press.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (2000c). The subject and power. In Foucault, M. & Faubion, J. D. (Eds.), Power (essential works of Foucault 1954-1984; Vol. 3, pp. 326–348). New York: The New Press.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (2002). Order of things. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (2007). Security, territory, population: Lectures at Collège de France 1977-1978 (Burchell, G., Trans.). London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (2010). The government of self and others: Lectures at the College de France 1982-1983. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Foucault, M., & Gordon, C. (Ed.). (1980). Power/Knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings 1972-1977. Hertfordshire, UK: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
Fournier, V., & Grey, C. (2000). At the critical moment: Conditions and prospects for critical management studies. Human Relations, 53(1), 7–32.Google Scholar
Gilbert, T., & Powell, J. L. (2010). Power and social work in the United Kingdom. A Foucauldian excursion. Journal of Social Work, 10(1), 3–22.Google Scholar
Grant, D., Iedema, R., & Oswick, C. (2009). Discourse and critical management studies. In Alvesson, M.Bridgman, T., & Willmott, H. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of critical management studies (pp. 213–231). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hier, S. P. (2004). Risky spaces and dangerous faces: Urban surveillance, social disorder and CCTV. Social Legal Studies, 13(4), 541–554.Google Scholar
Hopwood, A. G., & Miller, P. (Eds.). (1994). Accounting as social and institutional practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hudson, K. (2004). Behind the rhetoric of community development: How is it perceived and practiced? Australian Journal of Social Issues, 39(3), 249–265.Google Scholar
Hunter, I. (1994). Rethinking the School. St Leonards, NSW: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Ibarra-Colado, E., Clegg, S., Rhodes, C., & Kornberger, M. (2006). The ethics of managerial subjectivity. Journal of Business Ethics, 64(1), 45–55.Google Scholar
Iedema, R., Rhodes, C., & Scheeres, H. (2006). Surveillance, resistance, observance: Exploring the teleo-affective volatility of workplace interaction. Organization Studies, 27(8), 1111–1130.Google Scholar
Jack, G., & Lorbiecki, A. (2007). National identity, globalization and the discursive construction of organizational identity. British Journal of Management, 18, 79–94.Google Scholar
Jeacle, I., & Walsh, E. J. (2002). From moral evaluation to rationalization: Accounting and the shifting technologies of credit. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 27(8), 737–761.Google Scholar
Kelly, P., Allender, S., & Colquhoun, D. (2007). New work ethics? The corporate athlete's Back End Index and organizational performance. Organization, 14(2), 267–285.Google Scholar
Kelly, P., & Hickey, C. (2008). Player welfare and privacy in sports entertainment industry: Player development managers and risk management in Australian football league clubs. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 43(4), 383–398.Google Scholar
Knights, D. (2002). Writing organizational analysis into Foucault. Organization, 9(4), 575–593.Google Scholar
Knights, D., & Willmott, H. (1999). Management lives: Power and identity in work organizations. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Lin, A. (2009). Local interpretation of global management discourses in higher education in Hong Kong: Potential impact on academic culture. Inter-Asia Cultural Studies, 10(2), 260–274.Google Scholar
McLaren, M. A. (2002). Feminism, Foucault and embodied subjectivity. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
McKinlay, A., & Starkey, K. (Eds.). (1998). Foucault, management and organization Theory: From Panopticon to technologies of self. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Messner, M., Clegg, S., & Kornberger, M. (2008). Critical practices in organizations. Journal of Management Inquiry, 17(2), 68–82.Google Scholar
Millèr, P. (2008). Calculating economic life. Journal of Cultural Economy, 1(1), 51–64.Google Scholar
Millèr, P., & Rose, N. (Eds.). (1986). The power of psychiatry. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Millèr, P., & Rose, N. (2008). Governing the present: Administering economic, social and personal life. Cambridge, UK: Polity.Google Scholar
Murray, M. (2009). Waste management in Ireland: Discourses of domination in an (un)reflexive society. The Sociological Review, 57(1), 81–101.Google Scholar
O'Leary, T. (2002). Foucault: The art of ethics. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
O'Malley, P. (1992). Risk, crime and crime prevention. Economy and Society, 21(3), 252–257.Google Scholar
Osborne, T. (1993). Liberalism, neo-liberalism and the liberal profession of medicine. Economy and Society, 22(3), 345–356.Google Scholar
Pandian, A. (2008). Pastoral power in the postcolony: On the biopolitics of the criminal animal in South India. Cultural Anthropology, 23(1), 85–117.Google Scholar
Power, M. (1994). The audit of explosion. London: Demos.Google Scholar
Rose, N. (1999). Governing the soul: The shaping of the private self (2nd ed.). London: Free Association Books.Google Scholar
Rowlinson, M., & Carter, C. (2002). Foucault and history in organization studies. Organization, 9(4), 527–549.Google Scholar
Rowlinson, M., Stager, J. R., & Booth, C. (2009). Critical management and organization history. In Alvesson, M., Bridgman, T., & Willmott, H. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of critical. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sauder, M., & Espeland, W. N. (2009). The discipline of rankings: Tight coupling and organizational change. American Sociological Review, 75, 52–74.Google Scholar
Seeck, H., & Kantola, A. (2009). Organizational control: Restrictive or productive? Journal of Management & Organization, 15(2), 241–257.Google Scholar
Smart, B. (1998). Foucault, Levinas and the subject of responsibility. In Moss, J. (Ed.), The later Foucault (pp. 78–92). London: Sage.Google Scholar
Starkey, K., & Hatchuel, A. (2002). The long detour: Foucault's history of desire and pleasure. Organization, 9(4), 641–656.Google Scholar
Townley, B. (1993). Foucault, power/knowledge, and its relevance for human resource management. Academy of Management Review, 18(3), 518–545.Google Scholar
Triantafillou, P. (2003). Psychological technologies at work: A history of employee development in Denmark. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 24(3), 411–436.Google Scholar
Vaara, E., Sorsa, V., & Pälli, P. (2010). On the force potential of strategy texts: A critical discourse analysis of a strategic plan and its power effects in a city organization. Organization, 17, 685–702.Google Scholar
Walters, W. (1994). The discovery of ‘unemployment’. Economy and Society, 23(3), 265–290.Google Scholar
Wray-Bliss, E. (2002). Abstract ethics, embodied ethics: The strange marriage of Foucault and positivism in labour process theory. Organization, 9(1), 5–39.Google Scholar