Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T21:45:32.108Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

What's in a compound?1

Review products

LieberRochelle & ŠtekauerPavol (eds.), The Oxford handbook of compounding (Oxford Handbooks of Linguistics). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009. Pp. xx+691.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 June 2011

ANDREW SPENCER
ANDREW SPENCER*
Affiliation:
University of Essex
*
Author's address: Department of Language and Linguistics, University of Essex, Wivenhoe Park, Colchester CO4 3SQ, UK[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Oxford Handbook of Compounding surveys a variety of theoretical and descriptive issues, presenting overviews of compounding in a number of frameworks and sketches of compounding in a number of languages. Much of the book deals with Germanic noun–noun compounding. I take up some of the theoretical questions raised surrounding such constructions, in particular, the notion of attributive modification in noun-headed compounds. I focus on two issues. The first is the semantic relation between the head noun and its nominal modifier. Several authors repeat the argument that there is a small(-ish) fixed number of general semantic relations in noun–noun compounds (‘Lees's solution’), but I argue that the correct way to look at such compounds is what I call ‘Downing's solution’, in which we assume that the relation is specified pragmatically, and hence could be any relation at all. The second issue is the way that adjectives modify nouns inside compounds. Although there are languages in which compounded adjectives modify just as they do in phrases (Chukchee, Arleplog Swedish), in general the adjective has a classifier role and not that of a compositional attributive modifier. Thus, even if an English (or German) adjective–noun compound looks compositional, it isn't.

Type
Review Article
Information
Journal of Linguistics , Volume 47 , Issue 2 , July 2011 , pp. 481 - 507
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

[1]

I am grateful to two JL referees for their careful reading and for helpful comments.

References

REFERENCES

Ackema, Peter & Neeleman, Ad. 2004. Beyond morphology: Interface conditions on word formation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, Margaret R. 1978. Morphological investigations. Ph.D. dissertation, Cornell University.Google Scholar
Baker, Mark C., Aranovich, Roberto & Golluscio, Lucia A.. 2005. Two types of syntactic noun incorporation. Language 81, 138–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barker, Chris. 1995. Possessive descriptions. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Bauer, Laurie. 1998. When is a sequence of two nouns a compound? English Language and Linguistics 2, 65–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, David. 2002. The typology of parts of speech systems: The markedness of adjectives. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bisetto, Antonietta & Scalise, Sergio. 2005. The classification of compounds. Lingue e Linguaggio 4.2, 319–332.Google Scholar
Booij, Geert. 2009. Phrasal names: A constructionist analysis. Word Structure 2, 219–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Booij, Geert. 2010. Compound construction: Schemas or analogy? A construction morphology perspective. In Scalise, & Vogel, (eds.), 93–107.Google Scholar
Bücking, Sebastian. 2009. How do phrasal and lexical modification differ? Contrasting adjective–noun combinations in German. In Schlücker, & Hünning, (eds.), 184–204.Google Scholar
Carstairs-McCarthy, Andrew. 2010. Review of Rochelle, Lieber and Pavol, Štekauer (eds.), Oxford handbook of compounding. Word Structure 3.2, 252–260.Google Scholar
Ceccagno, Antonella & Basciano, Bianca. 2007. Compound headedness in Chinese: An analysis of neologisms. Morphology 17.2, 207–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahl, Östen. 2004. The growth and maintenance of linguistic complexity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahl, Östen. 2007. Grammaticalization in the North: Noun phrase morphosyntax in Scandinavian vernaculars (preliminary version, September 2007). Ms., Department of Linguistics, Stockholm University. www.ling.su.se/staff/oesten/downloads/Gram_north.pdf (retrieved 11 April 2011).Google Scholar
Downing, Pamela A. 1977. On the creation and use of English nominal compounds. Language 53.4, 810–842.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunn, Michael J. 1999. A grammar of Chukchi. Ph.D. dissertation, Australian National University, Canberra.Google Scholar
Gerdts, Donna B. 1998. Incorporation. In Spencer, & Zwicky, (eds.), 84–100.Google Scholar
Grimshaw, Jane. 1990. Argument structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney & Pullum, Geoffrey K. et al. 2002. The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kageyama, Taro. 2001. Word plus: The intersection of words and phrases. In van der Weijer, Jeroen & Nishihara, Tetsuo (eds.), Issues in Japanese phonology and morphology, 245–276. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lees, Robert B. 1960. The grammar of English nominalizations. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Levi, Judith N. 1978. The syntax and semantics of complex nominals. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Lieber, Rochelle. 2004. Morphology and lexical semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Meir, Irit, Aronoff, Mark, Sandler, Wendy & Padden, Carol A.. 2010. Sign languages and compounding. In Scalise, & Vogel, (eds.), 301–322.Google Scholar
Mithun, Marianne. 2000. Incorporation. In Booij, Geert, Lehmann, Christian & Mugdan, Joachim (eds.), Morphology: An international handbook on inflection and word-formation, vol. 1, 916–928. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Mithun, Marianne. 2010. Constraints on compounds and incorporation. In Scalise, & Vogel, (eds.), 37–56.Google Scholar
Montermini, Fabio. 2010. Units in compounding. In Scalise, & Vogel, (eds.), 77–92.Google Scholar
Muravjova, Irina A. 1998. Chukchee (Paleo-Siberian). In Spencer, & Zwicky, (eds.), 521–538.Google Scholar
Olsen, Susan. 2004. Coordination in morphology and syntax. In Meulen, Alice ter & Abraham, Werner (eds.), The composition of meaning: From lexeme to discourse, 17–37. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Payne, John & Huddleston, Rodney. 2002. Nouns and noun phrases. In Huddleston, & Pullum, et al. , 323–523.Google Scholar
Ricca, Davide. 2010. Corpus data and theoretical implications: With special reference to Italian VN compounds. In Scalise, & Vogel, (eds.), 237–254.Google Scholar
Roeper, Thomas & Siegel, Muffy E. A.. 1978. A lexical transformation for verbal compounds. Linguistic Inquiry 9.2, 199–260.Google Scholar
Sag, Ivan A., Wasow, Thomas & Bender, Emily M.. 2003. Syntactic theory: A formal introduction. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Scalise, Sergio & Vogel, Irene (eds.). 2010. Cross-disciplinary issues in compounding. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlücker, Barbara & Hünning, Matthias (eds.). 2009. Word and phrases – nominal expressions of naming and description: Special issue of Word Structure 2.2. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Shibatani, Masayoshi & Kageyama, Taro. 1988. Word formation in a modular theory of grammar: A case of postsyntactic compounds in Japanese. Language 64.3, 451–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spencer, Andrew. 1995. Incorporation in Chukchi. Language 71.3, 439–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spencer, Andrew. 1999. Transpositions and argument structure. In Booij, Geert & Marle, Jaap van (eds.), Yearbook of morphology 1998, 73–102. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spencer, Andrew & Zwicky, Arnold (eds.). 1998. Handbook of morphology. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Stirling, Lesley & Huddleston, Rodney. 2002. Deixis and anaphora. In Huddleston, & Pullum, et al. , 1449–1564.Google Scholar
Val, Álvero, Francisco, José. 1999. La composición. In Bosque, Ignacio & Demonte, Violeta (eds.), Gramática descriptiva de la lengua Española. Entrela oración y el discurso. Morfología, vol. 3, 4757–4841. Madrid: Editorial Espasa Calpe.Google Scholar
Zubizarreta, Maria Luisa. 1987. Levels of representation in the lexicon and in the syntax. Dordrecht: Foris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar