Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T21:14:36.907Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Thomas Hoffmann & Graeme Trousdale (eds.), The Oxford handbook of construction grammar (Oxford Handbooks). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013. Pp. xxii + 586.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 May 2014

Evie Coussé*
Affiliation:
University of Gothenburg
*
Author's address: Department of Languages and Literatures, University of Gothenburg, Box 200, 405 30 Gothenburg, Sweden[email protected]

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Chang, Nancy, De Beule, Joachim & Micelli, Vanessa. 2012. Computational Construction Grammar: Comparing ECG and FCG. In Steels, Luc (ed.), Computational issues in Fluid Construction Grammar: A new formalism for the representation of lexicons and grammars (Lecture Notes in Computer Science 7249), 259288. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Croft, William & Cruse, D. Alan. 2004. Cognitive linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele E. 2006. Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W. 2005. Construction grammars: Cognitive, radical and less so. In Ruiz de, Francisco J.Ibáñez, Mendoza & Cervel, M. Sandra Peña (eds.), Cognitive linguistics: Internal dynamics and interdisciplinary interaction, 101159. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W. 2009. Cognitive (Construction) Grammar. Cognitive Linguistics 20, 167176.Google Scholar
van Trijp, Remi. 2013. A comparison between Fluid Construction Grammar and Sign-Based Construction Grammar. Constructions and Frames 5, 88116.Google Scholar