Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T08:39:12.265Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The theory of empty categories and the pro-drop parameter in Modern Greek1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Irene Philippaki-Warburton
Irene Philippaki-Warburton
Affiliation:
University of Reading
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

One of the most promising new developments of recent research into theoretical syntax within the model of Government and Binding (GB) as presented in Chomsky (1981) and (1982) has been the new importance given to the study of languages other than English. This has stimulated a great deal of work into a variety of languages (see, for example, Rizzi, 1982; Borer, 1983; Bouchard, 1984; Huang, 1984 and others). It has also been welcomed by linguists outside the TG tradition. Thus, Comrie, (1984:155) expresses his delight that ‘Chomsky (1981) makes clear that generative grammarians have come to realize that an adequate study of syntax within universal grammar requires the study of languages of different types. Chomsky's main concern has always been to formulate a theory that would achieve ‘explanatory adequacy’ by providing a restrictive set of principles which could characterize universally the notion ‘natural language’. However, detailed and in-depth analyses of various languages have revealed that in order to achieve ‘descriptive adequacy’ the theory has to allow for cross-linguistic differences, or ‘parametric variation’. The concept of parametric variation weakens some-what the restrictiveness of the universal grammar (UG) hypothesis and even more so its purported innateness, since the values for the parameters must be arrived at by the child through induction from empirical evidence. Nevertheless, explanatory adequacy may still be attained if the number of parameters is very small and each parameter has few values.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Linguistics , Volume 23 , Issue 2 , September 1987 , pp. 289 - 318
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Borer, H. (1983). Parametric syntax: case studies in Semitic and Romance languages. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.Google Scholar
Borer, H. (1986). I-subjects. LIn 17. 375–416.Google Scholar
Bouchard, D. (1984). On the content of empty categories. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1977). On wh-movement. In Culicover, P., Wasow, T. & Akmajian, A. (eds.), Formal syntax. New York: Academic Press. 71–132Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1982). Some concepts and consequences of the theory of government and binding. Cambridge Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1986). Barriers. LI Monographs. Cambridge Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Comrie, B. (1984). Language universals and linguistic argumentation: a reply to Coopmans. JL 20. 155–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Groos, A. & Van Riemsdijk, H. (1979). Matching effects in free relatives: A parameter of core grammar. In Belletti, A. et al. (eds.), Theory of markedness in a generative grammar. Proceedings of the IVth GLOW conference, Pisa.Google Scholar
Drachman, G. (1985). Language universals; the two approaches. In Pieper, & Stickel, (eds.), Studia linguistica diachronica et synchronica. Amsterdam: Mouton.Google Scholar
Drachman, G. (1986). On subject-extraction: a case history in comparative generative grammar. Mimeographed.Google Scholar
Harbert, W. (1983). On the nature of the matching parameter. The Linguistic Review 2. 237–284.Google Scholar
Horrocks, G. (1983). The order of constituents in Modern Greek. In Gazdar, G., Klein, E. & Pullum, G. K. (eds.), Order concord and constituency. Dordrecht: Foris. 95–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horrocks, G. (1984). The lexical head constraint, X-theory and the ‘pro-drop parameter’. In de Geest, W. & Putsey, Y. (eds.), Sentential complementation. Dordrecht: Foris. 117–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horrocks, G. & Stavrou, M. (1987). Bounding theory and Greek syntax: evidence for wh-movement in NP. JL 23. 79–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, J. C. T. (1984). On the distribution and reference of empty pronouns. LIn 15. 531–574.Google Scholar
Ingria, R. (1981). Sentential complementation in Modern Greek. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, MIT University.Google Scholar
Joseph, B. (1976). Raising in Modern Greek: a copying process? In Hankamer, J. & Aissen, J. (eds.), Harvard studies in syntax and semantics 2. 241–278.Google Scholar
Jaeggli, O. (1982). Topics in Romance syntax. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Kayne, R. (1975). French syntax: the transformational cycle. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kayne, R. (1984). Connectedness and binary branching. Dordrecht: Foris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lascaratou, C. (1984). The passive voice in Modern Greek. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Reading University.Google Scholar
Perlmutter, D. (1971). Deep and surface constraints in syntax. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Philippaki-Warburton, I. (1977). Modern Greek clitic pronouns and the ‘surface structure constraints’ hypothesis. JL 13. 259–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Philippaki-Warburton, I. (1979). O metaschimatistikos kanonas tis anipsosis sta Nea Ellinika. Epistimoniki epetirida philosophikis scholis panepistimiou Thessalonikis IH′. 491–526.Google Scholar
Philippaki-Warburton, I. (1982). Constraints on rules of grammar as universals. In Crystal, D. (ed.)., Linguistic controversies. London: Edward Arnold. 95–107.Google Scholar
Philippaki-Warburton, I. (1985). Word order in Modern Greek. TPhS 2. 113–143.Google Scholar
Philippaki-Warburton, I. (1985). O sintachtikos charachtiras tou elipontos ipokimenou sta Ellinika. Studies in Greek Linguistics 6. 131–153.Google Scholar
Philippaki-Warburton, I. & Veloudis, I. (1984). I ipotaktiki stis eksartimenes protasis sta Nea Ellinika. Studies in Greek Linguistics 5. 151–167.Google Scholar
Philippaki-Warburton, I. & Stavrou, M. (1986) Eleuftheresanaphorikes protasis. Studies in Modern Greek Linguistics 7. in press.Google Scholar
Rizzi, L. (1982). Issues in Italian syntax. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Safir, K. (1985). Syntactic chains. Cambridge: CUPGoogle Scholar
Taraldsen, T. (1978). On the NIC, vacuous application, and the That-trace filter. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Taraldsen, T. (1983). The internal structure and external distribution of tensed clausal complements in English, French, and Norwegian. In de Geest, W. and Putsey, Y. (eds.), Sentential complementation. Dordrecht: Foris. 239–246.Google Scholar
Theophanopoulou-Kondou, D. (mimeographed). Kenes katigories ke klitika sti Nea Elliniki: i periptosi tou amesou antikimenou.Google Scholar
Warburton, I. (1977). See Philippaki-Warburton.Google Scholar