Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T00:04:27.132Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Theories of presupposition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

N. Burton-Roberts
Affiliation:
University of Newcastle upon Tyne

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Burton-Roberts, N. (1989). The limits to debate: a revised theory of semantic presupposition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1979). The political economy of human rights: II. Atlantic Heights: Spokesman Press.Google Scholar
Gazdar, G. (1979). Pragmatics: implicature, presupposition and logical form. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Kempson, R. (1988). Grammar and conversational principles. In Newmeyer, F. (ed.) Linguistics: the Cambridge survey, Vol. II. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 139163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langendoen, D. & Savin, H. (1971). The projection problem for presuppositions. In Fillmore, C. & Langendoen, D. (eds) Studies in linguistic semantics. New York: Holt. 5562.Google Scholar
Karttunen, L. (1973). The presuppositions of compound sentences. LIn 4. 169–93.Google Scholar
Karttunen, L. & Peters, S. (1979). Conventional implicature. In Oh, C. & Dinneen, D. (eds). Syntax and semantics: 11 Presupposition. New York: Academic Press. 156.Google Scholar
Sperber, D. & Wilson, D. (1986). Relevance: communication and cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Stalnaker, R. (1981). Review of Gazdar (1979). Lg 56. 902905.Google Scholar
van der Sandt, R. (1989). Presupposition projection as anaphora resolution. Unpublished: University of Nijmegen.Google Scholar