Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T23:03:27.405Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Stylistics and generative grammars

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

James Peter Thorne
Affiliation:
Department of English Language, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh 8

Extract

The proposal that a grammar should be considered as a device which generates all and only the well-formed sentences of a language, which has already had a profound effect upon linguistics in general, has begun to exert some influence on the more particular (if less well defined) subject of stylistics. To understand this, it is necessary to consider the way in which one tests such a grammar. This includes checking that for any grammatical sentence we observe there exists in the grammar a partially ordered sequence of formulae which would generale it. It is an inevitable outcome of any prolonged examination of a theory of this kind that there will arise cases which can be generated but with regard to which a decision as to whether or not they constitute a genuine example of the phenomena the theory is supposed to cover cannot be arrived at merely by reference to existing data: cf. Weyl (1949: 150). In linguistics this is called the problem of GRAMMATICALNESS. (Chomsky, 1957: 15)

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1965

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Braithwaite, R. B. (1960). Scientific Explanation. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1957). Syntactic Structures. (Janua Linguarum, No. 4.) ‘s-Gravenhage: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1961). Some methodological remarks on generative grammar. Word 17. 219239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crafts, L. W., Schneirla, Robinson and Gilbert, . (1938). Recent Experiments in Psychology. New York & London: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Hanson, N. R. (1958). Patterns of Discovery. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Harris, Z. S. (1961). Methods in Structural Linguistics. Chicago: University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Levin, S. (1962). Poetry and grammaticalness. Preprints of Papers for the Ninth International Congress of Linguists.Google Scholar
Saporta, S. (1960). The application of linguistics to the study of poetic language. In Style and Language (ed. Sebeok, T.). New York & London: Massachusetts Institute of Technology & John Wiley.Google Scholar
Weyl, H. (1949). Philosophy of Mathematics and Natural Science. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Whorf, B. L. (1961). Science and linguistics. In Language, Thought and Reality: Selected Writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf (ed. Carroll, J. B.). London & New York: Massachusetts Institute of Technology & John Wiley.Google Scholar