Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T22:56:41.292Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Phonological versus morphological rules: on German Umlaut and Ablaut

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Richard Wiese
Richard Wiese
Affiliation:
Seminar fur Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft, Heinrich-Heine- Universität Dusseldorf, Universitätsstr. I, D-40225 Düsseldorf, Germany. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

This paper addresses the relationship between phonology and morphology, using the vowel alternations of Standard German Umlaut and Ablaut as relevant examples. Umlaut is analysed as a completely unified process of vowel fronting which can be found in a wide variety of morphologically derived environments. A number of non-linear phonological analyses of Umlaut, involving a floating feature, are presented and compared. While Umlaut is interpreted, in current analyses, as a morphological rule, the present paper argues for its status as a lexical phonological rule.

Ablaut, on the other hand, is, synchronically, a totally unpredictable vowel change found mostly in the paradigms of so-called strong verbs. On the grounds of its internal and external behaviour, it is argued that this phenomenon must receive a completely different description by means of additional specifications for lexical entries.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Linguistics , Volume 32 , Issue 1 , March 1996 , pp. 113 - 135
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, Stephen R. (1982). Where's morphology? Linguistic Inquiry. 13 571–612.Google Scholar
Anderson, Stephen R. (1985). Inflectional morphology. In Shopen, Timothy (ed.) Language typology and syntactic description Vol. III: Grammatical categories and the lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 150–201.Google Scholar
Anderson, Stephen R. (1992). A-morphous morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Augst, Gerhard (1971). Über den Umlaut bei der Steigerung. Wirkendes Won. 21 424–431.Google Scholar
Bach, Emmon & King, Robert D. (1970). Umlaut in Modern German. Glossa. 4 3–21.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan (1993). Regular morphology and the lexicon. Ms., University of New Mexico.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam & Halle, Morris (1968). The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Féry, Caroline (1994). Umlaut and inflection in German. Ms., Tübingen University.Google Scholar
Giegerich, Heinz J. (1985). Metrical phonology and phonological structure. German and English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Giegerich, Heinz J. (1994). Base-driven stratification: morphological causes and phonological effects of ‘Strict Cyclicity’. In Wiese, Richard (ed.) Recent developments in Lexical Phonology. (Arbeiten des Sonderforschungsbereichs 282: Theorie des Lexikons 56.) Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf. 31–61.Google Scholar
Giegerich, Heinz J. (forthcoming). Lexical stratification in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hall, Tracy A. (1992). Syllable structure and syllable-related processes in German. Tübingen: Niemeyer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hooper, Joan B. (1976). An introduction to Natural Generative Phonology. New York, San Francisco, London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Iverson, Gregory K. & Salmons, Joe (1992). The place of Structure Preservation in German diminutive formation. Phonology. 9 137–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janda, Richard D. (1987). On the motivation for an evolutionary typology of sound-structural rules. Ph.D.dissertation, University of California at Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul (1982). From cyclic phonology to lexical phonology. In van der Hulst, Harry & Smith, Norval (eds.) The structure of phonological representations. (Part I.) Dordrecht: Foris. 131–175.Google Scholar
Kloeke, W. U. S.van, Lessen (1982). Deutsche Phonologie und Morphologie: Merkmale und Markiertheit. Tübingen: Niemeyer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lieber, Rochelle (1981). On the organization of the lexicon. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT. (Published by Indiana University Linguistics Club.)Google Scholar
Lieber, Rochelle (1987). An integrated theory of autosegmental processes. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Lieber, Rochelle (1992). Deconstructing morphology. Word formation in syntactic theory. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lodge, Ken (1986). An autosegmental account of German Umlaut. Ms., University of East Anglia.Google Scholar
Lodge, Ken (1989). A non-segmental account of German Umlaut: diachronic and synchronic perspectives. Linguistische Berichte. 124 470–491.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John J. (1986). OCP effects: gemination and antigemination. Linguistic Inquiry. 17 207–63.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John J. & Prince, Alan S. (1993). Prosodic Morphology I. Constraint interaction and satisfaction. Ms., University of Massachusetts, Amherst & Rutgers University.Google Scholar
Vennemann, Theo (1968). German phonology. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California at Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Wiese, Richard (1986). Schwa and the structure of words in German. Linguistics. 24 695–724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiese, Richard (1987). Phonologie und Morphologie des Umlauts im Deutschen. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft. 6 227–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiese, Richard (1988). Silbische und Lexikalische Phonologie. Studien zum Chinesischen und Deutschen. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Wiese, Richard (1994). Phonological vs. morphological rules: on German Umlaut and Ablaut. In Wiese, Richard (ed.) Recent developments in Lexical Phonology. (Arbeiten des Sonderforschungsbereichs 282: Theorie des Lexikons 56.) Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf. 91–114.Google Scholar
Wiese, Richard (1995). The phonology of German. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Wunderlich, Dieter & Fabri, Ray (1993). Minimalist morphology. Ms., Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf.Google Scholar
Wurzel, Wolfgang U. (1970). Studien zur Deutschen Lautstruktur. (Studia grammatica VIII.) Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar
Wurzel, Wolfgang U. (1984). Was bezeichnet der Umlaut im Deutschen? Zeitschrift für Phonetik, Sprachwissenschaft und Kommunikationsforschung. 37 647–663.Google Scholar
Zwicky, Arnold M. (1967). Umlaut and noun plurals in German. (Studia Grammatica VI.) 35–45.Google Scholar