Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T01:05:43.411Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Paula J. Schwanenflugel (ed.), The psychology of word meanings. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1991. Pp. xi + 292.

Review products

Paula J. Schwanenflugel (ed.), The psychology of word meanings. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1991. Pp. xi + 292.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

D. A. Cruse
Affiliation:
School of English and Linguistics, University of Wales, Bangor.

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barsalou, L. W. (1987). The instability of graded structure: implications for the nature of concepts. In Neisser, U. (ed.) Concepts and conceptual development: ecological and intellectual factors in categorization. New York: Cambridge University Press. 101140.Google Scholar
Cruse, D. A. (1990). Prototype theory and lexical semantics. In Tsohatzidis, S. L. (ed.) Meanings and prototypes: studies in linguist categorization. London: Routledge. 382402.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire and dangerous things: what categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyons, J. (1977). Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Murphy, G. L. & Medin, D. L. (1985). The role of theories in conceptual coherence. Psychological Review 92. 289316.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Osherson, D. N. & Smith, E. E. (1981). On the adequacy of prototype theory as a theory of concepts. Cognition 9. 3558.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Putnam, H. (1975). The meaning of ‘meaning.’ In Putnam, H.Mind, language and reality: philosophical papers (vol. 2). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar