Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-hvd4g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-23T14:34:26.186Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Iconicity of grammatical tonal polarity and reduplication in Nigerian Pidgin

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 January 2025

Samuel Kayode Akinbo*
Affiliation:
University of Toronto, 100 Saint George St., Toronto, Ontario, M5S 3G3, Canada
*
Email: [email protected]; https://akinbosk.github.io/
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This work focuses on a pattern of tonal alternation that is intertwined with a pattern of reduplication in Nigerian Pidgin. In the language, verbs are reduplicated to iconically express iteration. To convey that the iterated event occurs in an irregular or dispersive manner, the verb bears a low tone (L) on all its tone-bearing units (TBU), while the reduplicant bears a high tone (H) on all its TBUs. The resulting L-H tonal melody is considered the exponent of an irregular marker, while the intertwined reduplication is considered the exponent of an iteration marker. Due to the similarity between the exponent of the irregular marker and the iconic tonal melody of ideophones that express the semantic notions of irregularity across languages, the form-meaning mapping of the irregular marker is regarded as a grammaticalised form of the tone melody in the substrate ideophones. This suggests that ideophones can contribute to the emergence and expansion of grammar, as well as the typology of grammatical tone. Considering that perceptual resemblance between linguistic structures and the structural components of real-world elements is the basis of iconicity, the pattern of tonal alternation in Nigerian Pidgin suggests that the notion of perceptual motivation in linguistic theory is not purely phonetic and phonological but also includes the crossmodal perception of sensory imagery.

Type
Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press

1. Introduction

This work mainly focuses on a pattern of tonal overwrite in Nigerian Pidgin (also known as Naijá), which is intertwined with a pattern of reduplication and is consistent with the grammaticalisation of iconicity. One widely attested pattern of iconicity that is relevant to this work is the expression of iteration with reduplication or repetition. The association of segmental or suprasegmental disharmony with the semantic notion of irregularity or disorder (e.g. zigzag, pish-posh in English) is the other pattern of iconicity that is relevant to this work (Wallace Reference Wallace2019). The former pattern of iconicity is ubiquitous in ideophonic and non-ideophonic forms crosslinguistically (Hurch Reference Hurch2005), but evidence for the latter mostly comes from lexical tendency in ideophones. To present evidence for the iconic association of phonological disharmony with the notion of irregularity in morphophonological grammar, I describe and analyse two related patterns of reduplication in Naijá, a tonal English-lexifier contact language. To express the semantic notion of iteration or intensity, Naijá completely repeats a verb, as shown in (1b). To intensify the iteration, the verb can be repeated indefinitely, with each repetition increasing the intensity of the events. The multiple repetitions are indicated with a Kleene star ‘*’. To express that the iterated events occur irregularly or dispersively, the verb bears an L tone on all its tone-bearing units (TBUs), while its reduplicant bears an H tone on all its TBUs, irrespective of the verb’s inherent tone, as shown in (1c). The reduplicated form in (1c) can function either as a verb or noun. To intensify the expression of irregular iteration, the verb and its reduplicant have to be jointly repeated. However, in this case, the intensified form only functions as a verb. The patterns of reduplication are consistent across all documented varieties of Naijá and have remained unchanged since their initial formal analysis by Faraclas (Reference Faraclas1984), whose work was based on the Rivers varietyFootnote 1.

As a background to the discussion in this work, I present the relevant sound inventory of Naijá in §2. The two patterns of reduplication are described in §3. In §4, I present a novel account of the tonal alternation and reduplication within the framework of Optimality Theory (Prince & Smolensky Reference Prince and Smolensky2004) but appeal to domain-general cognitive processes rather than language-specific cognitive capacity preprogrammed with linguistic representation and rules (Bybee Reference Bybee2003, Archangeli & Pulleyblank Reference Archangeli and Pulleyblank2022). Following the proposal in Inkelas (Reference Inkelas2008), I analyse the pattern of reduplication associated with the expressions of iteration and intensification as morphological doubling. In his account of the reduplicative pattern that expresses irregular iteration, Faraclas (Reference Faraclas1984) attributes the tonal alternation to purely phonological rules and the reduplication to morphological doubling. Contrary to the analysis of Faraclas (Reference Faraclas1984), my account in this work is that the expression of irregular iteration involves two morphophonological components: an irregular marker with only a fixed L-H tone melody as its exponent, and an iteration-marking morpheme, which is a phonologically empty morpheme RED. Considering that the expression of irregular iteration is similar to the ideophones that express irregularity in the substrate languages in terms of their iconic tonal melody, semantic variability and non-displaceability, I argue that the irregular marker emerges from the tone melody of the ideophones expressing irregularity. As the association of phonological disharmony, such as tone polarity, with the concept of irregularity is a pattern of iconicity (Dingemanse Reference Dingemanse2011, Ibarretxe-Antuñano Reference Ibarretxe-Antuñano2017), the irregular marker in Naijá is consistent with a grammaticalised iconicity. The realisation of the tone melody and base-reduplicant relations are considered to be the effect of tone alignment, lexical categorisation and correspondence relations.

The results of this work are crucial to the theory of grammaticalisation and the origin of affixes, which typically is non-ideophonic words (Norde et al. Reference Norde, Wischer and Diewald2002). The emergence of the irregular marker in Naijá shows that ideophones can contribute to lexical expansion and grammaticalisation. Another significant contribution of the present study is related to the recurrent theme that ideophones are antipathic to inflectional and derivational affixes (Dingemanse Reference Dingemanse and van Lierto appear). As most reported cases of derivational affixes targeting ideophones are from Bantu languages (Samarin Reference Samarin1971, Shangase Reference Shangase2001), the irregular marker in Naijá contributes to the typology of ideophones that are integrated into derivational morphology. The motivation for disharmony, such as the polar-tone melody of the irregular marker, is typically attributed to perceptual enhancement or the distinctive identification of adjacent linguistic elements (Boersma 1998). To account for patterns of phonological disharmony with iconic motivation, such as the exponent of the irregular marker, I argue for the extension of perceptual motivation in linguistic theory to include crossmodal depiction of sensory imagery. As the iconic tonal melody is deeply integrated into the morphophonology of the language, this work contributes to the argument that iconicity can motivate phonological alternations and conditions (following Alderete & Kochetov Reference Alderete and Kochetov2017, Kawahara Reference Kawahara2020, Akinbo Reference Akinbo2021a, Reference Akinbo2023, Akinbo & Bulkaam Reference Akinbo and Bulkaam2024, Akinbo & Ekiugbo Reference Akinbo and Ekiugbo2024). Other theoretical implications of the irregular iteration are discussed in §5. The summary and conclusion of this work are presented in §6.

2. Language Background

Naijá is an English-lexifier contact language with more than 110 million speakers along the West African coast and predominantly in Nigeria (Esizimetor Reference Esizimetor2010, Faraclas Reference Faraclas, Akande and Salami2021). The language is mostly spoken as a first language (L1) in parts of Southern Nigeria and Lagos, and as a second language (L2) in other parts of the country. Considering that it has more features in common with creoles than pidgin, it is considered pidgincreole (Bakker Reference Bakker, Kouwenberg and Singler2008). There are many varieties of Naijá. To the best of my knowledge, the pattern of reduplication discussed in this work is present in all the documented varieties and has remained unchanged since its initial formal analysis by Faraclas (Reference Faraclas1984). However, in the variety spoken in the Western part of Nigeria, the pattern has extended beyond verbs to include ideophones. The present work mainly focuses on the Rivers, Western and Wafi varieties of the language. The data for the Rivers variety are from Faraclas (Reference Faraclas1984, Reference Faraclas2002), the online corpus of NaijaSynCor and two native speakers.Footnote 2 The Wafi data is from one native speaker of the variety. As a native speaker, the data for the Western variety is from my introspective knowledge. All the data presented in this work are in phonetic transcription.

2.1. Tone

Naijá is tonal like all documented Nigerian languages, except Fulfulde. The language contrasts two tones – namely, H(igh) and L(ow) – and the tonal contrast is illustrated with the minimal pair in Table 1. As shown in the table, H tone is marked with an acute diacritic and L tone with a grave diacritic. The language also has tone contours which are restricted to bimoraic or utterance-final syllables. For example, the word [fᴐ́] ‘four’ surfaces with an HL glide [fᴐ̂] in an utterance-final position.

Table 1. Tonal cooccurrence and minimal pairs in Naijá

There is a prepausal tone-lowering in Naijá, especially words that are phonologically close to their English sources. As shown in (2a), the verb [bóró] ‘borrow’ is realised as [bórò] before a pause. When a monosyllabic verb with an H tone occurs before a pause, it surfaces with an HL contour, as shown in (2b). That said, it is important to note that the prepausal lowering mostly applies to words from English sources. Also, as illustrated in (2c), the final lowering never occurs when the verb has an L-H tone melody. This pattern of final-tone lowering is found in other creole languages around the world and is considered a ‘declarative boundary tone (an utterance-final L-tone)’ (Yakpo Reference Yakpo2021). However, I consider it a pre-pausal lowering because it occurs in non-declarative constructions, as shown in (2).

2.2. Vowels and syllables

There are seven oral vowels in Naijá, as presented in (3). The vowels in Naijá are present in most if not all the Niger-Congo languages spoken in Southern parts of Nigeria (Williamson Reference Williamson1984, Elugbe & Omamor Reference Elugbe and Omamor1991).

The language also has nasalised vowels, which can be traced to a consonant that follows an oral vowel. For example, the nasal vowel of the word [tɔ̃́] ‘turn’ can be traced to the nasal consonant of the English source. The nasal consonant surfaces when the word is followed by a vowel-initial word, as in [tᴐ́n-ã́m] ‘turn it!’.

A syllable in Naijá is constructed of a syllabic nasal, or a vowel with or without an onset or a coda consonant. Similar to English, Naijá permits onset and coda clusters. In fact, the syllable-based generalisations about Naijá are consistent with those of its main lexifier, English (Kahn Reference Kahn1976). Consider the examples in (4) from Faraclas (Reference Faraclas2002: 256–257).

As we will see, the syllable structure of Naijá is crucial to the analysis of the reduplicative patterns in this work. In the next section, I present and describe the two reduplicative patterns.

3. Verbal Reduplication in Naijá

This section describes two patterns of verbal reduplication in Naijá, which are similar in terms of the segmental properties and meaning. The first pattern expresses iteration, intensity or habituation. The second pattern expresses various semantic notions that will be classified as irregular iteration, due the semantic variability of the derivation. The main focus of this work is the expression of irregular iteration, but it is better understood by also examining the expression of iteration. As a point of departure, I present the reduplication of verbs with open syllable.

As shown in (5), the verbs with open syllable are completely reduplicated to express iteration. In this case, there is a pause between each verb and its copy. For bisyllabic verbs with an H-H melody from English, the verbs and their respective copies have an H-L melody in the expression of iteration. To express that the iterated event occurs in an irregular, alternating or dispersive manner, the first copy of the verb bears an L tone on all its tone-bearing units (TBU) and the second copy of the verb bears an H tone on all its TBUs. Unlike the expression of iteration, there is no pause between the verb and its copy in the expression of irregular iteration. Another distinction between iteration and irregular iteration is the epenthesis of a vowel in the reduplication of closed-syllable verbs. Consider the example sets in (6).

For the expression of iteration, the reduplication of closed-syllable verbs patterns like the open-syllable verbs. However, for the expression of irregular iteration, the vowel [i] or [u] is epenthesised at the end of the first and the second copies of the closed-syllable verb. The choice of epenthetic vowel is determined by the preceding consonant or vowel of the verb. As shown in (6a–b), the epenthetic vowel is [u] when the preceding vowel is a high back vowel or the preceding consonant is labial. When the preceding consonant is palatal, the additional vowel is [i], as illustrated in (6c). In other environments, the epenthetic vowel is [i], as shown in (6d). The additional vowel also bears the same tone as the preceding TBU. The pattern of reduplication discussed in this work applies to words from both English and non-English sources, such as the verb [ʃúk] ‘stab’ in (6c) and the ideophone [dʒìgì] ‘shake’ in (5c).

The expression of iteration and irregular iteration applies to verbs in all varieties of Naijá. However, in the Western variety, the expression of irregular iteration has been extended to a few adverbial ideophones, such as the examples in (7). The adverbial ideophones also pattern like verbs.

Another aspect of both iteration and irregular iteration is that they can be intensified through multiple repetition of the verbs. Consider the sentences with the expression of iteration and irregular iteration in (8–9). As shown in (8), each repetition of the verb increases the intensity of the iteration. Although the examples in (8b–d) show three repetitions, the verb can be repeated as many times as the speaker wishes. When there is no pause between the final copy of the repeated verb and the following word, as shown in (8d), there is no final tone-lowering on the last copy of the verb. In contrast to the expression of iteration, irregular iteration is intensified by repeating the verb in pairs for each cycle of intensification. As a result, odd numbers of verb copies, such as three or five, are not permitted, as illustrated in (9d-e). In this case, the intensified irregular iteration only functions as verb.Footnote 3 It is important to note that the present and past tenses are not marked in Naijá, so the expression of irregular iteration either has present or past tense in their verbal usage.

I have described the second pattern of reduplication as expressing the semantic notion of irregular iteration, but the meaning varies by situational and linguistic contexts. For example, the meaning involves performing an action iteratively up and down, iteratively here and there, iteratively helter-skelter, incessantly anywhere and anytime, iteratively anyhow, etc. Consequently, the semantic variability is better captured as dispersive or irregular iteration. There is a phonological connection between the irregular iteration and the internally reduplicated ideophones that express semantic notions of irregularity in other Nigerian languages. As illustrated in (10), the ideophones tend to have a polar tonal melody and semantic variability. When such ideophones are incorporated into Naijá, they conform to the L-H melody like the derived irregular iteration, regardless of their tone in the source languages.

The reduplication of certain ideophones in Yorùbá, such as the onomatopoeias in (11), is comparable to the expression of iteration and irregular iteration in Naijá (see Fordyce Reference Fordyce and Dihoff1983, Awoyale Reference Awoyale1989). To express iteration, the onomatopoeias are completely reduplicated. To express the semantic notion of irregular iteration, the onomatopoeias are also reduplicated, but in this case, the first copy bears an L tone on its TBU, and the second copy bears an M tone on its TBU.

Before turning to an analysis of the reduplicative patterns and the tone melody of the irregular iteration in Naijá, the following descriptive generalisations can be made about the patterns.

4. Analysis

4.1. Expressing iteration

I sketch a basic analysis of the iteration in this section, as a background to an analysis of the irregular iteration. As mentioned earlier, the expression of iteration involves a complete reduplication of verbs, and the verbs can be multiply repeated for intensity. In linguistic theory, complete reduplication is either analysed as morphological doubling or base-reduplicant correspondence. Under a doubling account, reduplication involves the repetition of a morphosyntactic unit (e.g. affix, root, stem, etc.) (Inkelas Reference Inkelas2008). Morphological doubling can target affixes, roots, stems and phrases (Inkelas Reference Inkelas2008: 354, Pulleyblank Reference Pulleyblank, Hanson and Inkelas2009). For a base-reduplicant account, reduplication involves copying the (sub)segmental elements of the base into RED, which is an abstract and phonologically empty morpheme (McCarthy & Prince Reference McCarthy and Prince1993, Reference McCarthy, Prince, Beckman, Dickey and Urbanczyk1995). Unlike morphological doubling, a base-reduplicant relation tends to involve morpheme-size requirement, epenthesis, assimilation and other operations that are motivated by phonological well-formedness (Inkelas Reference Inkelas2008: 354).

Following Morphological Doubling Theory (Inkelas Reference Inkelas2008), my account is that the expression of iteration involves the morphosyntactic doubling of a verb phrase in Naijá. The expression of iteration is schematically represented in (13). Due to selecting the same morphosyntactic identity, the daughters of the iterative reduplicative construction are semantically and phonologically identical. The syntax of morphological doubling is a property of the mother node, but the mother’s meaning is an iconic function of the daughters’ meaning. Given that the verbs can be multiply repeated in the expression of iteration, the account is that two or more daughters can be adjoined to a single mother. This multiple repetition is a kind of depictive reduplication (Dingemanse Reference Dingemanse2015). A similar pattern is found in the multiple repetition of the CV-shaped reduplicant in Fungwa (Akinbo Reference Akinbo2023) and the internal/external reduplication of ideophones across languages (Dingemanse Reference Dingemanse2015, Hurch Reference Hurch2005).

As mentioned earlier, certain verbs and each of their repetitions have final-tone lowering when they express the notion of iteration (see §3). If we consider that tone lowering only occurs before a pause in Naijá, each repetition of the verbs has to be utterance-final. The assumption in this work is that the expression of iteration involves doubling a verb phrase. An evidence that points to verb-phrase doubling is that the final iteration of the verb does not undergo a final-tone lowering when it is followed by an object, as shown in (8d). In the next section, I show that the first two copies of the verbs in the expression of irregular iteration do not involve morphological doubling but both the third and fourth copies, fifth and sixth copies (etc.) do.

4.2. Segmental properties of irregular iteration

This section accounts for the expression of irregular iteration by drawing insights from the account of iteration in the previous section. The expression of irregular iteration, unlike the expression of iteration, is not consistent with the properties of morphological doubling, considering that it involves well-formedness conditions. For example, expressing the notion of irregular iteration involves vowel epenthesis and tonal overwrite with an L-H melody. Given that the vowel epenthesis only occurs when closed-syllable verbs are reduplicated, the expression of irregular iteration has to involve a phonological well-formedness, in addition to morphosyntactic conditions. Patterns of reduplication involving phonological well-formedness conditions have been analysed as a product of the interaction between markedness and base-reduplicant correspondence constraints (McCarthy & Prince Reference McCarthy and Prince1993, Reference McCarthy, Prince, Beckman, Dickey and Urbanczyk1995, Urbanczyk Reference Urbanczyk1996). Under this approach, output-output correspondence relations hold between ‘the reduplicant, which is the phonological exponent of RED, and the base, which is an adjacent string that provides segmental content for the reduplicant’ (Urbanczyk Reference Urbanczyk1996: 16). The constraint Max-BR drives base-reduplicant correspondence by requiring every base segment to be in correspondence with the reduplicant. In this case, Max-BR can drive a complete copying of the base.

To account for the derivation of irregular iteration, I adopt the base-reduplicant account within Correspondence Theory (McCarthy & Prince Reference McCarthy and Prince1993, Reference McCarthy, Prince, Beckman, Dickey and Urbanczyk1995). Crucially, I assume that the derivation of irregular iteration involves two morphemes – namely, an irregular marker and an iteration marker. The irregular marker has an L-H tone melody, which causes the tonal alternation, as its exponent. However, the iteration marker is RED, which is a phonologically empty morpheme (McCarthy & Prince Reference McCarthy and Prince1993, Reference McCarthy, Prince, Beckman, Dickey and Urbanczyk1995). An account of the tonal alternation is presented in §4.3, but this subsection and subsequent ones only focus on the segmental property of RED. In Generalised Template Theory, the shape of RED is determined by its morphological categorisation as a root or an affix (Urbanczyk Reference Urbanczyk1996). Considering that Naijá has less affixes and clitics except for pronouns, I assume that the reduplicant is categorised as a root. Another motivation for this account is that the reduplication involves complete base copying. In (15), I illustrate how the Max-BR constraint can account for the complete reduplication in Naijá. As shown in (15), the constraint Max-BR rules out candidates without a complete base-reduplicant correspondence.

The descriptive generalisation in (12bii) indicates that the irregular-iteration form can be intensified by repeating the verb and its copy. This suggests that the target of intensity is neither the base nor the reduplicant but the base-reduplicant composite. Just as the expression of iteration in §4.1, the account here is that the repetition of the base and the reduplicant involves morphological doubling of the form derived in base-reduplicant relations. In this case, the base-reduplicant composite and its repetitions are daughters of a mother node. While the form derived from base-reduplicant relation can be a verb or noun, the repetition of the derived form only involves verbs. My account is that only the verbal instantiation of the base-reduplicant composite is morphologically doubled. Thus, the meaning of the mother node is an iconic function of the daughters, just like the expression of iteration. Although the daughters and mother in this case are verbs, the account is that the morphosyntax of the reduplication in morphological doubling is a property of the mother node, not the daughters. The fact that the repetition involves two copies of the verbs (and the epenthetic vowel) is in line with the account that the morphological doubling targets the forms derived from the base-reduplicant relations. This section has mainly focused on the reduplication of open-syllable verbs. In the next section, I account for the reduplication of closed-syllable verbs.

4.3. Codas and base-reduplicant relations in irregular iteration

The complete reduplication of closed-syllable verbs would have resulted in a reduplicant with a hetero- or tauto-syllabic consonant cluster, as illustrated in (16a–b). While the reduplication of CVC verbs would have resulted in a cluster with two consonants, the reduplication of CCVC verbs would have resulted in consonant clusters within the base and the reduplicant, and at the base-reduplicant juncture. The clusters can result in the violation of the constraint *Cluster in (17a), which prohibits adjacent consonants. To satisfy the constraint, there are two main options: consonant deletion and vowel epenthesis. The option of deletion is not adopted, given that the consonants of the root-internal and base-reduplicant clusters are not deleted. This suggests that the constraint Max-IO, which requires every segment in the input to have an output correspondent, has to be ranked above *Cluster.

We are left with the option of vowel epenthesis. Resolving the root-internal cluster with vowel epenthesis would result in the violation of the constraint Contiguity, which requires adjacent segments to form a contiguous string in their input-output mapping. That the root-internal cluster is not resolved with vowel epenthesis is also considered an effect of Contiguity, which has to be ranked above the constraint *Cluster. The surface forms, such as (16), indicate that the language prefers the option of vowel epenthesis. However, it is important to note that vowel epenthesis applies only to consonant clusters at the base-reduplicant boundary. Thus, the vowel could have been epenthesised in either the base or the reduplicant. My account is that the vowel is epenthesised in the base rather than the reduplicant. Given that Max-BR requires base-reduplicant identity, the prediction is that the reduplicant will also copy the epenthetic vowel. This prediction holds as the final vowel of the reduplicant is similar to the epenthetic vowel. The vowel epenthesis will result in the violation of the constraint Dep-[+High], which assigns violation to an epenthetic high vowel. The constraint has to be ranked below the constraint Dep-[ $ - $ High], which assigns violation to an epenthetic non-high vowel. The insertion of the vowel in the base, instead of the reduplicant, can be considered an effect of the constraint Dep-BR, which requires the segment of a reduplicant to have a correspondent in the base.

The epenthesis of a base-final vowel and its subsequent copying by the reduplicant satisfy *Cluster and the constraint against codas, *Coda, at least in the context of CVC verb reduplication. Considering that the language permits any consonant as a coda, the constraint *Coda has to be ranked below *Cluster. In (19)–(20), I illustrate how these constraints can account for the segmental properties of reduplication in Naijá.

The candidates in (19b, d) and (20a, d) are ruled out for fatal violations of the constraint *Cluster. The candidates in (19c) and (20c) satisfy *Cluster through base-consonant deletion but lose for violating the constraint Max-IO. The candidates in (19g) and (20g) are ruled out for violating the constraint Dep-BR. As indicated in (20i), the constraint Contiguity prevents the resolution of the consonant cluster in CCVC verbs through vowel epenthesis. By resolving the hetero-syllabic cluster through vowel epenthesis, the candidates in (19e) and (20f) win. As shown earlier, the epenthetic vowel is either [i] or [u], but the tableaux in (19)–(20) only contain the epenthesis of [i]. In the next section, I account for the choice of the epenthetic vowel.

4.4. Vowel epenthesis, harmony and local assimilation in irregular iteration

The preference for high vowel in epenthetic contexts is not peculiar to Naijá. Across languages, high vowels are mostly favoured in epenthetic contexts (Uffmann Reference Uffmann2006). Phonological explanations for favouring the high vowels [i, u] as epenthetic vowels is that they are universally attested (Hume Reference Hume, Marc, Hume and Rice2011). As a result of this, they are considered to be unmarked. That high vowels are mostly preferred in epenthetic contexts is considered the emergence of the unmarked (McCarthy & Prince Reference McCarthy, Prince and Gonzàlez1994). On the perceptual side, the preference for high vowels in epenthetic contexts is due to their low sonority and perceptual weakness relative to other vowels (Howe & Pulleyblank Reference Howe and Pulleyblank2004). The perceptual explanation is phonetically grounded, considering that height-based sonority directly corresponds to vowel duration, loudness and oral pressure (Parker Reference Parker2002). Phonological asymmetry between high and non-high vowels are also considered an effect of perceptual salience.

Howe & Pulleyblank (Reference Howe and Pulleyblank2004) encode the relative sonority of vowels as the constraint hierarchy shown in (22). Considering that the sonority ranking between [i] and [u] varies based on language (Parker Reference Parker2002, Gordon et al. Reference Gordon, Ghushchyan, McDonnell, Rosenblum and Shaw2012), the epenthesis of the vowel [i] instead of [u] is said to involve a language-specific ranking of markedness constraints *u $ >> $ *i. By using the constraint ranking, we can account for the epenthesis of high front vowel instead of high back vowel, as illustrated in (23).

Having accounted for the epenthesis of high front vowels, I now turn to the factors that determine whether [i] or [u] is epenthesised. As mentioned in §3, the choice of epenthetic vowel in the reduplicative pattern includes complex dependencies on the surrounding vowel and consonantal place. The vowel [u] is epenthesised when the preceding vowel is [u] or when the preceding consonant is labial. In general, the choice of epenthetic vowel is determined by complex interactions between vowel and consonant-vowel harmony. The same pattern is attested in the vowel epenthesis of loanword adaptation in the substrate languages (Kenstowicz Reference Kenstowicz2006, Uffmann Reference Uffmann2006). By drawing insight from the account of similar patterns in the substrate languages, I account for the choice of the epenthetic vowel in the reduplication of closed-syllable verbs.

The epenthesis of [u] can be considered a case of height-based rounding harmony (Kaun Reference Kaun and Bronson2004). The height-based rounding harmony can be formally encoded as an effect of the constraint *[+Round,+High]…[ $ - $ Round], which assigns violation to a high rounded vowel that is followed by an unrounded vowel. The place of articulation of the preceding consonant also determines the epenthetic vowel: the epenthetic vowel is [u] when the preceding consonant is labial. The labial harmony occurs regardless of surrounding vowels being [+Round] or [ $ - $ Round]. When the preceding consonant is palatal, the height-based rounding harmony is blocked. In this case, the epenthetic vowel has to be the default vowel [i]. That the palatal consonant blocks rounding harmony can be considered the effect of the constraint *Palatal-[+Round], as defined in (24b).

Given that the vowel [u] surfaces as a result of rounding harmony, the constraint *[+Round,+High]…[ $ - $ Round] has to be ranked above the constraint that prohibits the vowel [u]. Instead of inserting the vowel [u], the constraint *[+Round,+High]…[ $ - $ Round] could have been satisfied by fronting high vowels in the base. Given that this solution is not adopted, the constraint *[+Round,+High]…[ $ - $ Round] has to be ranked below the constraint Ident-IO. As the consonant-vowel assimilation can result in vowel disharmony, the constraint on rounding harmony has to be ranked below the constraints *Palatal-[+Round] and *Lab-[+Round], which are not crucially ranked relative to each other. In (26-28), this account is illustrated.

The candidate that incurs a fatal violation of the constraint *[+Round,+High]…[ $ - $ Round] is ruled out, as in (26a). While the candidate in (26c) satisfies *[+Round,+High]…[ $ - $ Round], it is ruled out for violating the constraint IDENT-IO. The candidate in (26b) wins for satisfying the constraint on harmony to the detriment of the constraint *u. The ranking also accounts for consonant-vowel assimilations, as shown in (27) and (28). In the next section, I focus on the tones of the base and the reduplicant.

4.5. Tonal alternation of irregular iteration

Recall my assumption in §4.2 is that the expression of irregular iteration involves two morphemes – namely, iteration and irregular markers. The former and latter have RED and L-H tone melody as their respective exponents. In this sense, the L-H tone melody is a grammatical tone, which is ‘a tonological operation that is not general across the phonological grammar, and is restricted to the context of a specific morpheme or construction’ (Rolle Reference Rolle2018: 1). The tone lowering and raising of the base and reduplicant, respectively, are considered the effect of the L-H melody. I support the account that the L-H tone melody is an exponent of an irregular marker by comparing the derivation of irregular iteration to the underived ideophones that express the same meaning in Naijá and its substrate languages.

The discussion in §3 indicates that the expression of irregular iteration in Naijá shares many similarities with ideophones that inherently express irregularity in ethnic Nigerian languages, in terms of their polar tonal melody, reduplication and semantic variability. The association of tonal or featural polarity with the notion of irregularity is not limited to Nigerian languages but found in ideophones across languages, such as the form [lǝ́káy-lǝ̀kày] ‘walk unsteadily’ in Mundang (Elders Reference Elders, Voeltz and Kilian-Hatz2001: 100) and the form [lăplāpl $ \overset{\smile }{\mathrm{y}} $ n] ‘disorderly’ in Cantonese (Hashimoto Reference Hashimoto1972: 95). Studies suggest that the alternating tone melody of the irregular ideophones is perceptually similar to the trajectory of irregular events or structures such as zigzag and moving helter-skelter, etc. Therefore, the association of alternating tone melody with the irregularity and the realisation of the tone melody is a pattern of iconicity (Fordyce Reference Fordyce and Dihoff1983, Dingemanse Reference Dingemanse2011, Wallace Reference Wallace2019). The realisation of the L and H tones of the irregular marker on the base and reduplicant, respectively, can be considered another pattern of iconicity, as it depicts that one subcomponent of the iterated event (or entity) does not conform to the other subcomponent of the same event. Given the similarity between the tone of the irregular marker in Naijá and the tone of irregular ideophones in its substrate languages, my account is that the irregular marker in Naijá is morphophonologically modelled after the tonal and segmental properties of ideophones in the substrate languages and possibly after the form-meaning mapping principles underlying iconicity (Assaneo et al. Reference Assaneo, Nichols and Trevisan2011, Emmorey Reference Emmorey2014, Dingemanse Reference Dingemanse2015). The emergence of the irregular marker from the ideophonic source is a kind of grammaticalisation.

To account for the realisation of the L-H melody, we must take into account that the base and reduplicant are morphologically categorised as root morphemes. In realising each tone of the grammatical tonal melody, we observe that the L tone is only realised on the tone-bearing units (TBUs) of the base and the H tone is only realised on the TBUs of the reduplicant. In other words, each tone of the melody never crosses a root boundary. This indicates that the tones of the irregular marker refer to a root morpheme as their domain of operation. The realisation and maximal extension of the tone melody on all TBUs of the root morphemes are considered the effect of morpheme-specific anchor constraints, which require a tone of the irregular marker to have a correspondent at edges of a root morpheme (following Finley Reference Finley2009 based on McCarthy & Prince Reference McCarthy, Prince, Beckman, Dickey and Urbanczyk1995). The anchor constraints are also a set of correspondence constraints like the base-reduplicant constraints. While the constraints on base-reduplicant relations regulate output-output correspondence relations, anchor constraints regulate input-output correspondence relations. The L-tone instantiations of the anchor constraints are presented in (29). The constraint L-Anchor-L assigns no violations if the L tone of the irregular marker is realised on the leftmost TBU of a root morpheme. Similarly, the constraint R-Anchor-L assigns no violations if the L tone of the irregular marker is realised on the rightmost TBU of a root morpheme. In a situation where the L tone of the irregular marker is only realised on the rightmost or medial TBU, the constraint L-Anchor-L assigns a violation to every TBU to the left of the TBU associated with the L tone. If the L tone of the irregular marker is only associated with the leftmost or medial TBU, the constraint R-Anchor-L assigns a violation to every TBU to the right of the TBU associated with the L tone. If the L tone of the grammatical tonal melody has no correspondent in the base and reduplicant, the anchor constraints assign a violation to every TBU of the base and reduplicant. I assume that the H tone versions of the anchor constraints are active in the language.

This account of the tonal alternation is illustrated in (30)–(31). The lexical and grammatical tones are indicated with numeral indexation. The affixation of the tone is indicated with parentheses, comparable to an autosegmental association line.

The tableau in (30) shows the realisation of the grammatical tone in the reduplication of a bisyllabic verb with an H tone. The ranking rules out candidates that involve one root morpheme bearing all the grammatical tone melody, such as (30b). Despite realising the L and H tones of the irregular marker on one TBU of the base and reduplicant, respectively, the candidates in (30c–d) incur a fatal violation of the anchor constraints. Although the candidate in (30f) satisfies the anchor constraints, it is ruled out for violating Max-BR. By realising the L and H tones of the grammatical tone on all the TBUs of the base and reduplicant, respectively, the candidate in (30e) wins. The ranking can also account for the realisation of the tone melody in the reduplication of trisyllabic words, such as the ideophone in (31). The attachment of derivational (or inflectional) affixes to ideophones is rare across languages. Most of the documented cases are from Bantu languages (Samarin Reference Samarin1971, Shangase Reference Shangase2001). Even in such cases, the derivational affixes are segments. This indicates that Naijá presents a rare case of derivational morphology.

Prior to this work, Faraclas (Reference Faraclas1984) presents the only known formal account of the tonal alternation found in the expression of irregular iteration in Naijá. His account of the tonal alternation is mostly based on two keen observations. The first observation, laid out in §2.1, is that stressed syllables bear an H tone when they are loaned into Naijá. This stress-to-tone mapping in Naijá is also found in the substrate languages (Kenstowicz Reference Kenstowicz2006) and other languages around the world (Glewwe Reference Glewwe2021). The other observation is that certain words bear an L tone in a final environment. Taking the observations into consideration, Faraclas (Reference Faraclas1984) argues that the L tone on the base is an effect of the final lowering, and the H tone on the reduplicant is a byproduct of the stress-to-tone mapping. Under this account, the reduplicant bearing an H tone on all its TBUs results from a phonological rule that spreads the stress-sourced H tone to all toneless TBUs. The same rule is also said to be responsible for the spreading of the final L tone to all TBUs of the base. Therefore, the tonal alternation of the irregular iteration is considered to be purely phonological.

The account of Faraclas (Reference Faraclas1984) predicts that the tonal alternation in the expression of irregular iteration operates across all kinds of reduplication in the language. However, this is not the case, considering that the tonal alternation does not occur beyond the expression of irregular iteration, as illustrated in (32b). Contrary to the prediction of the account in Faraclas (Reference Faraclas1984), the tone lowering in Naijá only occurs utterance-finally, not medially or initially as it does for the base of the reduplication in the expression of irregular iteration. The third crucial point is that the reduplicant of an L-tone verb bears an H tone when they are involved in the expression of irregular iteration. In this case, the H tone of the reduplicant in the expression of irregular iteration cannot be traced to stress-to-tone mapping.

In general, the account of Faraclas (Reference Faraclas1984) fails to capture the descriptive generalisations of Naijá. Apart from ignoring the fact that the tonal alternation in the expression of irregular iteration is morphological, another downside of his account is that the contributions of the substrate languages are ignored. My account of the irregular iteration as a morphologically conditioned tonal alternation is more comprehensive, as it captures the general pattern in Naijá. Another advantage of my analysis is that the phonological properties of irregular iteration are consistent with similar iconic patterns in substrate languages and other languages around the world. The tone melody, as the exponent of the irregular marker, indicates that Naijá is highly influenced by its substrate languages, which are well-known for having grammatical tone (Rolle Reference Rolle2018). In the next section, we explore the theoretical implications of the expression of irregularity in Naijá.

5. Theoretical implications of Naijá

The account sketched in this work is that the expression of irregular iteration involves a grammatical tone which has a base-reduplicant composite as its morphological stem. I consider the irregular marker to be modelled after ideophones that express irregularity in the substrate languages, as a result of their shared form-meaning mapping, connection with reduplication, and semantic variability. The irregular marker does not only attach to ideophonic stems but extends to verbs in the language. In linguistic literature, ideophones and other expressive words have received little theoretical attention until recently (e.g. Haiman Reference Haiman2018, Dingemanse Reference Dingemanse and van Lier2023), partly due to the traditional perspective that iconicity is a peripheral aspect of grammar (Hockett Reference Hockett1960, de Saussure Reference de Saussure1974). However, recent studies argue for the consideration of ideophones in linguistic analysis and theory, as both iconicity and arbitrariness play crucial roles in grammar (Nuckolls Reference Nuckolls1999, Perniss et al. Reference Perniss, Thompson and Vigliocco2010, Dingemanse & Akita Reference Dingemanse and Akita2017, Dingemanse et al. Reference Dingemanse, Blasi, Lupyan, Christiansen and Monaghan2015). Evidence for the new perspective about form-meaning mapping mostly comes from lexical forms and probabilistic tendency across diverse samples of world languages (Haynie et al. Reference Haynie, Bowern and LaPalombara2014, Thompson et al. Reference Thompson, Van Hoey and Do2021, Winter et al. Reference Winter, Sóskuthy, Perlman and Dingemanse2022), but novel findings from language documentation and description indicate that certain phonological alternations are also conditioned by iconicity (Akinbo Reference Akinbo2021a, Akinbo & Bulkaam Reference Akinbo and Bulkaam2024, Akinbo & Ekiugbo Reference Akinbo and Ekiugbo2024). The irregular marker in Naijá can be considered another evidence for the modern perspective that both arbitrariness and iconicity play complementary roles in grammar. In this section, I also present additional justifications for the integration of iconicity into linguistic theory by exploring theoretical implications of the irregular marker.

The emergence of the irregular marker from ideophones expressing irregularity is crucial to the study of grammaticalisation, which involves lexical items or constructions serving grammatical functions through mechanisms such as decategorisation, context extension and phonetic erosion (Hopper & Traugott Reference Hopper and Traugott2003, Heine Reference Heine, Joseph, Janda and Vance2017). Studies on grammaticalisation mostly point to arbitrary lexical forms as the origin of affixes and clitics, but recent studies include ideophones. In this case, the occurrence of ideophones in predicate structures and their capability as stems of inflectional and/or derivational affixes are considered their final stage of grammaticalisation (Heine & Kouteva Reference Heine and Kouteva2002, Heine Reference Heine, Joseph, Janda and Vance2017, Andrason & Heine Reference Andrason, Heine, Hancil and Tantucci2023, Heine Reference Heine2023). Crucially, evidence for the involvement of ideophones in derivational morphology mostly comes from Bantu languages (Samarin Reference Samarin1971, Tassa Reference Tassa, Voeltz and Kilian-Hatz2001). The fact that the irregular marker can have ideophones as its base of derivation suggests that ideophones are also grammatically integrated in Naijá. Contrary to the hypothesis that the emergence of ideophones as affix-bearing words is their final stage of grammaticalisation, the modelling of the irregular marker after the substrate ideophones indicates that ideophones can also be grammaticalised as affixes. While the emergence of the irregular marker from ideophones as a featural affix points to decategorisation and phonetic erosion, the targeting of verbs, as well as ideophones, as the morphological stem of irregular marker points to an effect of the context-extending mechanism of grammaticalisation.

Research on iconicity in English-based contact languages, including Naijá, is mostly limited to ideophones and reduplication (e.g. Faraclas Reference Faraclas2002, Odiegwu & Romero-Trillo Reference Odiegwu and Romero-Trillo2023). While most of the ideophones in documented contact languages are said to be from the substrate languages, cognates beyond onomatopoeic words are underdocumented (Samarin Reference Samarin and Hancock1979, Childs Reference Childs1994, Reference Childs, Spears and Winford1997, Reference Childs, Voeltz and Kilian-Hatz2001). However, such studies rarely consider the nature of form-meaning mapping in morphophonemic alternations. Even when the studies consider phonological alternations, the source of such alternations is mostly attributed to the lexifier languages (e.g. Faraclas Reference Faraclas1984: on the tone melody of irregular iteration). A recent study indicates that the patterns of morphemic syllable metathesis and truncation in the Wafi variety of Naijá, such as [pòló] ‘polo shirt’ vs. [lòpó] ‘unconventional negative polo shirt’ and [bâːg] ‘bag’ vs. [âːg] ‘unconventional negative bag’, are motivated by iconicity (see Akinbo & Ekiugbo Reference Akinbo and Ekiugbo2024: for the basis of the iconicity). The irregular marker suggests that iconicity can motivate phonological alternations not only at the level of syllable but also at the suprasegmental level. While phonological alternations with iconicity as their motivation are under-represented in linguistic literature, the irregular marker in Naijá contributes to growing body of evidence for iconicity as a source of phonological grammar (Alderete & Kochetov Reference Alderete and Kochetov2017, Kawahara Reference Kawahara2020, Akita Reference Akita2021, Akinbo Reference Akinbo2021a, Akinbo & Bulkaam Reference Akinbo and Bulkaam2024, Akinbo & Ekiugbo Reference Akinbo and Ekiugbo2024).

Polar tonal melody, such as those of the irregular ideophones, is a pattern of phonological disharmony. In phonological theory. The preference for prosodically dissimilar adjacent segments or suprasegments across languages is considered to be perceptually motivated, as adjacent elements are easier to distinguish visually or auditorily when they possess dissimilar properties (Boersma Reference Boersma1998, Frisch Reference Frisch, Hayes, Kirchner and Donca2004). This traditional notion of perceptual motivation in linguistic theory cannot account for phonological disharmony with iconic motivations. Indeed, iconicity research has used empirical methods to uncover iconic motivations behind phonological patterns even without reference to theory at large – for example, tonal patterns (Fordyce Reference Fordyce and Dihoff1983, Thompson Reference Thompson2018), segmental probability (Thompson et al. Reference Thompson, Chan, Yeung and Do2022) and patterning of articulatory features (Johansson & Zlatev Reference Johansson and Zlatev2013, Thompson et al. Reference Thompson, Van Hoey and Do2021). To integrate iconicity into phonological theory, the concept of perceptual motivation has to be extended beyond language-internal conditions (see Taub Reference Taub2001, Emmorey Reference Emmorey2014: for discussion on structure mapping). For this reason, we have to take into account that the basis of iconicity is the perceptual resemblance between structural components of real-world elements and linguistic structure. In this sense, phonological alternations with iconicity as their motivation are perceptually motivated. Therefore, the irregular marker supports extending the notion of perceptual motivation in phonological theory to include the cross-modal depiction of sensory imagery (Akinbo & Bulkaam Reference Akinbo and Bulkaam2024, Akinbo & Ekiugbo Reference Akinbo and Ekiugbo2024).

The integration of iconicity into grammar has implications for various models of grammar, especially the hypothesis that knowledge of linguistic rules, constraints and conditions are innate properties of a language-specific cognitive capability (Chomsky Reference Chomsky1965, Chomsky & Halle Reference Chomsky and Halle1968). Therefore, the prediction is that phonological patterns with iconic motivations are innate. The prediction does not hold, considering the diversity of iconicity and the linguistic ability to phonologically depict new events or entities (e.g. creation of new onomatopoeias for novel sound events (Assaneo et al. Reference Assaneo, Nichols and Trevisan2011, Bezat et al. Reference Bezat, Kronland-Martinet, Roussarie and Ystad2014, Taitz et al. Reference Taitz, Assaneo, Elisei, Trpodi, Cohen, Sitt and Trevisan2018)). Iconicity, as a process of mapping structural components of real-world entities or events to linguistic form (Emmorey Reference Emmorey2014), is consistent with the proposal of Emergent Grammar that grammar emerges from domain-general cognitive properties such as memory, paying attention to details and similarities (Hopper Reference Hopper, Aske, Beery, Michaelis and Hana1987, Bybee Reference Bybee2003, Archangeli & Pulleyblank Reference Archangeli and Pulleyblank2022). Although the proposal is based on descriptive morphophonological patterns, it can be extended to depictive modes of signification such as iconic reduplication and phonological disharmony. For instance, the vocal depiction of a perceived event, such as a rock falling into water causing a splash, has to involve paying attention to the structural components of the event and its similarity with other events (see Thompson & Do Reference Thompson and Do2019 for such an analysis of ideophones), regardless of their modality. Similar crossmodal mappings are found in musical traditions with speech surrogates, in which phonetic and phonological structures of words are imitated with musical melody and vice versa (McPherson Reference McPherson2018, Seifart et al. Reference Seifart, Meyer, Grawunder and Dentel2018, Akinbo Reference Akinbo2019, Reference Akinbo2021b, Durojaye et al. Reference Durojaye, Knowles, Patten, Garcia and McBeath2021, James Reference James2021). In this sense, the form-meaning mapping of musical speech surrogate is partly comparable to onomatopoeia. Based on these similarities between form-meaning mapping in musical speech surrogate and language, phonological alternations with iconic motivation, such as the tonal melody of the irregular marker in Naijá, points to domain-general cognitive processes as the source of language. Evidence from brain-imagery studies on music cognition and iconicity, such as Koelsch et al. (Reference Koelsch, Kasper, Sammler, Schulze, Gunter and Friederici2004), Kanero et al. (Reference Kanero, Imai, Okuda, Okada and Matsuda2014) and Brown et al. (Reference Brown, Martinez and Parsons2006), supports the hypothesis that language shares cognitive resources with other modalities.

A recurrent theme regarding creoles is that they evolve by simplifying the grammar of their donor languages, often resulting in minimal use of lexical tone, if any, and rarely employing grammatical tone (Samarin Reference Samarin and Hancock1979, Bickerton Reference Bickerton1981, McWhorter Reference McWhorter2001). Yakpo (Reference Yakpo2021) challenges the claim that tone loss or reduction is a feature of creolisation by citing numerous examples of lexical and grammatical tones in Pichi, Guyanese Creole and other creoles around the world. Like these English-based contact languages, Naijá also has highly productive lexical and grammatical tones (Faraclas Reference Faraclas1984, Akinbo & Ekiugbo Reference Akinbo and Ekiugbo2024). The tonal alternation in the expression of irregularity presents additional evidence for the existence of complex tone systems in creoles. Notably, the expression of irregularity in Naijá is comparable to the patterns of tonal alternation in Guyanese Creole (Devonish & Thompson Reference Devonish and Thompson2010: 11, cited in Yakpo Reference Yakpo2021) and Pichi in terms of tone melody pattern, syntax, and semantics (Yakpo Reference Yakpo2019: 92–100). Considering that iconic grammatical tones are underdocumented across languages, the irregular marker in Naijá contributes to the typology of grammatical tone in contact languages.

6. Summary and Conclusion

I have described and analysed two patterns of reduplication in Naijá, in which the second pattern is intertwined with a pattern of tonal alternation. In the first pattern, the language expresses iteration through a complete reduplication of verbs. The verb can be multiply iterated. In the second pattern of reduplication, which is the main focus of this work, Naijá expresses irregular iteration through a complete reduplication of verbs. When the verb has a closed syllable, an additional vowel is added to the base and its reduplicant. Regardless of the tone of the verb, the verb base alongside the additional vowel (if any) bears an L tone on all its TBUs, and the TBUs of the reduplicant bear an H tone. The base-reduplicant composite in the expression of irregular iteration can be multiple iterated.

The expression of iteration is analysed as morphological doubling of a verb phrase. Multiple iteration of verbs in the expression of intensity is considered an effect of multiple morphological doubling. For the expression of irregular iteration, the tonal alternation and reduplication are considered the results of two morphemes – namely, irregular and iteration markers. In this case, the irregular maker has an L-H-tone melody as its exponent, and the iteration marker is RED, which is a phonologically empty morpheme. The realisation of the tone melody and RED are byproducts of independent and interacting constraints. The epenthetic vowel is conditioned by consonant-cluster resolution and (consonant-)vowel harmony. Similar to the expression of iteration, the expression of irregular iteration through the base-reduplicant relation can be intensified through morphological doubling. The morphophonological properties of the two reduplicative patterns are consistent with crosslinguistic patterns of iconicity, supporting the emerging perspective that both arbitrariness and iconicity are integral aspects of grammar in Naijá. The tone melody of the irregular iteration is comparable to that of ideophones in its main ethnic lexifiers, suggesting that the substrate ideophones and crossmodal perception sensory imagery are the sources of the irregular marker. This indicates that iconicity can contribute to grammaticalisation and grammatical expansion.

The account of the irregular iteration presented in this work is contrary to that of previous research, which attributes the tone melody of the reduplication to the main lexical donor and general phonological rules (Faraclas Reference Faraclas1984). If we consider that, until recently, certain features of pidgins and creoles, including iconicity, have been mostly attributed to Universal Grammar (Bickerton Reference Bickerton1981, Kouwenberg & LaCharité Reference Kouwenberg, LaCharité and Kouwenberg2003), it is likely that substrate-influenced iconicity beyond lexicalised ideophones is underdocumented. Future research on morphophonemic processes in pidgins and creoles should focus on the nature of form-meaning association. Most importantly, the present work contributes to the typology of iconic patterns and grammatical tones across languages.

Footnotes

Earlier versions of this article were presented at the Linguistics Lecture Series at the Structures Formelles du Langage of Paris 8 University and the CNRS lab on February 15, 2023, as well as a guest lecture in LING410 Advanced Phonology at UBC, taught by Douglas Pulleyblank in 2015. I would like to thank Douglas Pulleyblank, Kofi Yakpo, Chiemezie Onyinye Anulika, Nkechi Ukaegbu, Japhet Ajani, Odirin V. Abonyi and Marc van Oostendorp, two anonymous reviewers and the editor of the Journal of Linguistics, for their comments and suggestions. Any errors of fact or explanation in this article are solely my responsibility.

1 The River variety of Naijá is spoken in Rivers State, Cross River, Imo and Anambra States.

3 An example of the verbal usage of the reduplicated form is in the vocal of the song Coffin for the Head of State by Fela Kuti, at 11:37 time stamp of the YouTube video: https://youtu.be/HwLYHCCwGT0?t=697.

References

Akinbo, Samuel Kayode. 2019. Representation of Yorùbá tones by a talking drum: An acoustic analysis. Linguistique et Langues Africaines. 1123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Akinbo, Samuel Kayode. 2021a. Featural affixation and sound symbolism in Fungwa. Phonology. 38(4). 537569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Akinbo, Samuel Kayode. 2021b. The language of gángan, a Yorùbá talking drum. Frontiers in Communication. 6. 650382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Akinbo, Samuel Kayode. 2023. Reduplication, repetition and sound symbolism in Fungwa. Phonological Data and Analysis. 5. 124. https://doi.org/10.7365/pda.v5art2.72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Akinbo, Samuel Kayode & Bulkaam, Michael. 2024. Iconicity as the motivation for the signification and locality of deictic grammatical tones in Tal. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics. 9(1).Google Scholar
Akinbo, Samuel Kayode & Ekiugbo, Philip Oghenesuowho. 2024. Iconicity as the motivation for morphophonological metathesis and truncation in Nigerian Pidgin. Open Linguistics. 10(1). 20240013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Akita, Kimi. 2021. A typology of depiction marking: The prosody of Japanese ideophones and beyond. Studies in Language. 45(4). 865886.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alderete, John & Kochetov, Alexei. 2017. Integrating sound symbolism with core grammar: The case of expressive palatalization. Language. 93(4). 731766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrason, Alexander & Heine, Bernd. 2023. On the grammaticalization of ideophones. In Hancil, Sylvie & Tantucci, Vittorio (eds.), Different slants on grammaticalization, vol. 232, 237262. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Archangeli, Diana & Pulleyblank, Douglas. 2022. Emergent phonology. Berlin: Language Science Press.Google Scholar
Assaneo, Mara Florencia, Nichols, Juan Ignacio & Trevisan, Marcos Alberto. 2011. The anatomy of onomatopoeia. PloS One. 6(12). e28317.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Awoyale, Yiwola. 1989. Reduplication and the status of ideophones in Yoruba. Journal of West African Languages. 19(1). 1534.Google Scholar
Bakker, Peter. 2008. Pidgins versus creoles and pidgincreoles. In Kouwenberg, Silvia & Singler, John Victor (eds.), The handbook of pidgin and creole studies, 130157. West-Sussex: Wiley Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bezat, Marie-Céline, Kronland-Martinet, Richard, Roussarie, Vincent & Ystad, Sølvi. 2014. From acoustic descriptors to evoked quality of car door sounds. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 136(1). 226241.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bickerton, Derek. 1981. Roots of language. Ann Arbor, MI: Karoma.Google Scholar
Boersma, Paul. 1998. Functional phonology. University of Amsterdam PhD thesis.Google Scholar
Brown, Steven, Martinez, Michael J. & Parsons, Lawrence M.. 2006. Music and language side by side in the brain: A PET study of the generation of melodies and sentences. European Journal of Neuroscience. 23. 27912803.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan. 2003. Phonology and language use, vol. 94. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Childs, G. Tucker. 1994. Expressiveness in contact situations: The fate of African ideophones. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages. 9(2). 257282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Childs, G. Tucker. 1997. The status of Isicamtho, an Nguni-based urban variety of Soweto. In Spears, Arthur K. & Winford, Donald (eds.), The structure and status of pidgins and creoles, 341372. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Childs, G. Tucker. 2001. Research on ideophones, whither hence?: The need for a social theory of ideophones. In Voeltz, F. K. Erhard & Kilian-Hatz, Christa (eds.), Ideophones, vol. 44, 6373. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1965. Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam & Halle, Morris. 1968. The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Devonish, Hubert & Thompson, Dahlia. 2010. A concise grammar of Guyanese Creole (Creolese). München: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
Dingemanse, Mark. 2011. The meaning and use of ideophones in Siwu. Radboud University Nijmegen Nijmegen PhD thesis.Google Scholar
Dingemanse, Mark. 2015. Ideophones and reduplication: Depiction, description, and the interpretation of repeated talk in discourse. Studies in Language. 39(4). 946970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dingemanse, Mark. 2023. Ideophones. In van Lier, Eva (ed.), The oxford handbook of word classes, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dingemanse, Mark. to appear. Ideophones. In van Lier, Eva (ed.), The oxford handbook of word classes, Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/u96z.Google Scholar
Dingemanse, Mark & Akita, Kimi. 2017. An inverse relation between expressiveness and grammatical integration: On the morphosyntactic typology of ideophones, with special reference to Japanese. Journal of Linguistics. 53(3). 501532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dingemanse, Mark, Blasi, Damián E., Lupyan, Gary, Christiansen, Morten H. & Monaghan, Padraic. 2015. Arbitrariness, iconicity, and systematicity in language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 19(10). 603615.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Durojaye, Cecilia, Knowles, Kristina L., Patten, K. Jakob, Garcia, Mordecai J. & McBeath, Michael K.. 2021. When music speaks: An acoustic study of the speech surrogacy of the Nigerian dùndùn talking drum. Frontiers in Communication. 6. 652690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elders, Stefan. 2001. Defining ideophones in Mundang. In Voeltz, F. K. Erhard & Kilian-Hatz, Christa (eds.), Ideophones, vol. 44, 97110. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elugbe, Ben Ohiọmamhẹ & Omamor, Augusta Phil. 1991. Nigerian pidgin: Background and prospects. Ibadan, Nigeria: Heinemann Educational Books.Google Scholar
Emmorey, Karen. 2014. Iconicity as structure mapping. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 369(1651). 20130301.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Esizimetor, David Oshorenoya. 2010. Historical development of Naijá. In A paper presented at the Conference on Nigerian Pidgin, University of Ibadan, Nigeria, 8 $ -- $ 9 July, 2009, Institut Français de Recherche en Afrique (IFRA).Google Scholar
Faraclas, Nicholas. 1984. Rivers pidgin English: Tone, stress, or pitch-accent language? Studies in the Linguistic Sciences. 14(2). 6776.Google Scholar
Faraclas, Nicholas. 2002. Nigerian pidgin. London/New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faraclas, Nicholas. 2021. Naija: A language of the future. In Akande, Akinmade T. & Salami, Oladipo (eds.), Current trends in Nigerian Pidgin English: A sociolinguistic perspective, 938. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finley, Sara. 2009. Morphemic harmony as featural correspondence. Lingua. 119(3). 478501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fordyce, James F. 1983. The ideophone as a phonosemantic class: The case of Yoruba. In Dihoff, Ivan R. (ed.), Current approaches to african linguistics, vol. 1, 263278. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Frisch, Stefan A. 2004. Language processing and segmental ocp effects. In Hayes, Bruce, Kirchner, Robbert & Donca, Steriade (eds.), Phonetically based phonology, vol. 346, 346371. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glewwe, Eleanor. 2021. The phonological determinants of tone in English loanwords in Mandarin. Phonology. 38(2). 203239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, Matthew, Ghushchyan, Edita, McDonnell, Bradley, Rosenblum, Daisy & Shaw, Patricia A.. 2012. Sonority and central vowels: A cross-linguistic phonetic study. 219256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haiman, John. 2018. Ideophones and the evolution of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hashimoto, Oi-kan Yue. 1972. Phonology of cantonese, vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Haynie, Hannah, Bowern, Claire & LaPalombara, Hannah. 2014. Sound symbolism in the languages of australia. PLoS One. 9(4). e92852.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heine, Bernd. 2017. Grammaticalization. In Joseph, Brian D., Janda, Richard D. & Vance, Barbara S. (eds.), The handbook of historical linguistics, 573601. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd. 2023. The grammar of interactives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd & Kouteva, Tania. 2002. World lexicon of grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hockett, Charles F. 1960. The origin of speech. Scientific American. 203(3). 8897.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hopper, Paul. 1987. Emergent grammar. In Aske, Jon, Beery, Natasha, Michaelis, Laura & Hana, Filip (eds.), Annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, vol. 13, 139157. Berkley, CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. & Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 2003. Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howe, Darin & Pulleyblank, Douglas. 2004. Harmonic scales as faithfulness. Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue Canadienne de Linguistique. 49(1). 149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hume, Elizabeth. 2011. Markedness. In Marc, Colin J. Ewen, Hume, Elizabeth V. & Rice, Keren (eds.), Companion to phonology, vol. 5, 80105. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hurch, Bernhard. 2005. Studies on reduplication. Berlin: Mount de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ibarretxe-Antuñano, Iraide. 2017. Basque ideophones from a typological perspective. Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue Canadienne de Linguistique. 62(2). 196220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inkelas, Sharon. 2008. The dual theory of reduplication. Linguistics. 46(2). 351401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, Lucas. 2021. Systems of communication: Aspects of culture and structure in speech surrogates. Frontiers in Communication. 6. 653268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johansson, Niklas & Zlatev, Jordan. 2013. Motivations for sound symbolism in spatial deixis: A typological study of 101 languages. The Public Journal of Semiotics. 5(1). 120.Google Scholar
Kahn, Daniel. 1976. Syllable-based generalizations in English phonology. Massachusetts Institute of Technology PhD thesis.Google Scholar
Kanero, Junko, Imai, Mutsumi, Okuda, Jiro, Okada, Hiroyuki & Matsuda, Tetsuya. 2014. How sound symbolism is processed in the brain: A study on Japanese mimetic words. PLoS One. 9(5). e97905.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaun, Abigail. 2004. The typology of rounding harmony. In Bronson, Barnard Sawyer (ed.), Phonetically based phonology, 87116. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kawahara, Shigeto. 2020. Sound symbolism and theoretical phonology. Language and Linguistics Compass. 14(8). e12372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenstowicz, Michael. 2006. Tone loans: The adaptation of English loanwords into Yoruba. In Selected proceedings of the 35th annual conference on african linguistics, 136146. Cascadilla Proceedings Project Somerville, MA.Google Scholar
Koelsch, Stefan, Kasper, Elisabeth, Sammler, Daniela, Schulze, Katrin, Gunter, Thomas & Friederici, Angela D.. 2004. Music, language and meaning: Brain signatures of semantic processing. Nature Neuroscience. 7. 302307.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kouwenberg, Silvia & LaCharité, Darlene. 2003. The meanings of ‘more of the same’: Iconicity in reduplication and the evidence for substrate transfer in the genesis of caribbean creole languages. In Kouwenberg, Silvia (ed.), Twice as meaningful: Reduplication in pidgins, creoles and other contact languages, 718. London: Battlebridge.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John J. & Prince, Alan. 1993. Prosodic morphology: Constraint interaction and satisfaction. University of Massachusetts manuscript.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John J. & Prince, Alan. 1994. The emergence of the unmarked: Optimality in prosodic morphology. In Gonzàlez, Mercè (ed.), Proceedings of the North East Linguistic Society, 333379. Amherst, MA: Graduate Linguistic Student Association.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John J. & Prince, Alan. 1995. Faithfulness and reduplicative identity. In Beckman, Jill N., Dickey, Laura Walsh & Urbanczyk, Suzanne (eds.), Papers in Optimality Theory, 249384. GLSA.Google Scholar
McPherson, Laura. 2018. The Talking balafon of the Sambla: Grammatical principles and documentary implications. Anthropological Linguistics. 60(3). 255294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McWhorter, John H. 2001. The worlds simplest grammars are creole grammars. Linguistic Typology. 125166.Google Scholar
Norde, Muriel et al. 2002. The final stages of grammaticalization: Affixhood and beyond. In Wischer, lse & Diewald, Gabriele (eds.), New reflections on grammaticalization, 4565. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nuckolls, Janis B. 1999. The case for sound symbolism. Annual Review of Anthropology. 28(1). 225252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Odiegwu, Nancy Chiagolum & Romero-Trillo, Jesús. 2023. Gradience in iconicity: Evidence from total reduplicative constructions in Nigerian Pidgin. Review of Cognitive Linguistics.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, Stephen G. 2002. Quantifying the sonority hierarchy. University of Massachusetts PhD thesis.Google Scholar
Perniss, Pamela, Thompson, Robin L. & Vigliocco, Gabriella. 2010. Iconicity as a general property of language: Evidence from spoken and signed languages. Frontiers in Psychology. 1. 227.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Prince, Alan & Smolensky, Paul. 2004. Optimality theory: Constraint interaction in generative grammar. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pulleyblank, Douglas. 2009. Patterns of reduplication in Yoruba. In Hanson, Kristin & Inkelas, Sharon (eds.), The nature of the word: Essays in honor of Paul Kiparsky, 311357. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Rolle, Nicholas Revett. 2018. Grammatical tone: Typology and theory. University of California, Berkeley PhD thesis.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samarin, William J. 1971. Survey of Bantu ideophones. African Language Studies. 12.Google Scholar
Samarin, William J. 1979. Simplification, pidginization, and language change. In Hancock, Ian F. (ed.), Readings in creole studies, 5568. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Saussure, Ferdinand. 1974. Course in general linguistics. London: Fontana.Google Scholar
Seifart, Frank, Meyer, Julien, Grawunder, Sven & Dentel, Laure. 2018. Reducing language to rhythm: Amazonian Bora drummed language exploits speech rhythm for long-distance communication. Royal Society Open Science. 5(4). 170354.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shangase, Sibusiso Elphus. 2001. The non-productive verbal extensions in Zulu: A study in derivational morphology. University of Natal, Durban PhD thesis.Google Scholar
Taitz, Alan, Assaneo, M. Florencia, Elisei, Natalia, Trpodi, Mónica, Cohen, Laurent, Sitt, Jacobo D. & Trevisan, Marcos A.. 2018. The audiovisual structure of onomatopoeias: An intrusion of real-world physics in lexical creation. PloS One 13(3). e0193466.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tassa, Okombe-Lukumbu. 2001. La formation des radicaux déidéophonique et des idéophones déverbatifs en Tetela (dialecte Ewango). In Voeltz, F. K. Erhard & Kilian-Hatz, Christa (eds.), Ideophones, vol. 44, 375384. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taub, Sarah F. 2001. Language from the body: Iconicity and metaphor in American Sign Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Arthur L., Chan, May Pik Yu, Yeung, Ping Hei & Do, Youngah. 2022. Structural markedness and depiction: The case of lower sequential predictability in Cantonese ideophones. The Mental Lexicon. 17(2). 300324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Arthur Lewis. 2018. Are tones in the expressive lexicon iconic? Evidence from three Chinese languages. PloS One. 13(12). e0204270.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thompson, Arthur Lewis & Do, Youngah. 2019. Defining iconicity: An articulation-based methodology for explaining the phonological structure of ideophones. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics. 4(1). 140.Google Scholar
Thompson, Arthur Lewis, Van Hoey, Thomas & Do, Youngah. 2021. Articulatory features of phonemes pattern to iconic meanings: Evidence from cross-linguistic ideophones. Cognitive Linguistics. 32(4). 563608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uffmann, Christian. 2006. Epenthetic vowel quality in loanwords: Empirical and formal issues. Lingua. 116(7). 10791111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Urbanczyk, Suzanne Claire. 1996. Patterns of reduplication in Lushootseed. University of Massachusett, Amherst PhD thesis.Google Scholar
Wallace, Ted Jansson. 2019. A study in flim-flam: Reduplicative ablaut ideophones in English. Lund University BA thesis.Google Scholar
Williamson, Kay. 1984. Practical orthography in Nigeria. Ibadan: Heinemann Educational Books.Google Scholar
Winter, Bodo, Sóskuthy, Márton, Perlman, Marcus & Dingemanse, Mark. 2022. Trilled/r/is associated with roughness, linking sound and touch across spoken languages. Scientific Reports. 12(1). 111.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yakpo, Kofi. 2019. A grammar of Pichi. Berlin: Language Science Press.Google Scholar
Yakpo, Kofi. 2021. Creole prosodic systems are areal, not simple. Frontiers in Psychology. 12. 690593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1. Tonal cooccurrence and minimal pairs in Naijá