Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T19:49:51.102Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Gemination within English loanwords in Ammani Arabic: An Optimality-theoretic analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 June 2020

MOHAMMED NOUR ABU GUBA Open the ORCID record for MOHAMMED NOUR ABU GUBA [Opens in a new window]
MOHAMMED NOUR ABU GUBA*
Affiliation:
Sharjah University
*
Author’s address: University of Sharjah, P.O. Box 27272, Sharjah, UAE[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Adopting an Optimality-theoretic approach, this paper examines gemination in English loanwords in Ammani Arabic (AA). Data come from a corpus of 1200 loanwords as produced by 12 AA monolingual native speakers. Results show that gemination, which is not attested in the source input, is induced to satisfy AA structural constraints and to render the output better well-formed. Of particular interest, results show that the introduction of English loanwords into AA highlights the activity of a constraint that requires prosodic words in AA, and probably many Arabic dialects, to be left-aligned with a foot. This constraint enhances our understanding of many aspects of Arabic phonology such as stress assignment and foot formation. The study has important implications for Arabic phonology, loanword phonology and second language acquisition.

Keywords

Arabicgeminationloanword phonologyOptimality Theory
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Linguistics , Volume 57 , Issue 1 , February 2021 , pp. 3 - 40
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

I am indebted to Professors Janet Watson from Leeds University and Stuart Davis from Indiana University for their feedback and comments on an earlier version of this paper. I am also thankful to three anonymous Journal of Linguistics referees for their helpful comments and suggestions on previous versions of this paper. Thanks are also due to the participants for providing me with the data and to my colleagues for verifying the pronunciation.

References

Abu-Abbas, Khaled H. 2003. Topics in the phonology of Jordanian Arabic. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Kansas.Google Scholar
Abu Guba, Mohammed Nour. 2016. Phonological adaptation of English loanwords in Ammani Arabic. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Salford.Google Scholar
Abu Guba, Mohammed Nour. 2018. Stress assignment in polysyllabic words in Levantine Arabic: An Optimality-theoretic analysis. Lingua Posnaniensis 60.2, 7–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abu-Rakhieh, Belal A. 2009. The phonology of Maˈani Arabic: Stratal or parallel OT. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Essex.Google Scholar
Abu-Salim, Issam. 1982. A reanalysis of some aspects of Palestinian Arabic: A metrical approach. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Illinois.Google Scholar
Adra, Mohammed A. 1999. Identity effects and opacity in Syrian Arabic: An Optimality Theory analysis. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign.Google Scholar
Al-Mohanna, Faisal M. 2004. Paradoxical non-finality: Stress assignment in three Arabic dialects. Ms., King Saud University. http://roa.rutgers.edu/files/735-0505/735-AL-MOHANNA-0-1.PDF (February 2014).Google Scholar
Al-Tamimi, Feda, Abu-Abbas, Khaled & Tarawnah, Rama. 2010. Jordanian Arabic final geminates: An experimental clinical phonetic study. Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 46.2, 111–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Al-Tamimi, Jalal & Khattab, Ghada. 2011. Multiple cues for the singleton–geminate contrast in Lebanese Arabic: Acoustic investigation of stops and fricatives. Proceedings of the 17th International Congress of Phonetics Sciences (ICPhS XVII), Hong Kong, 212–215. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/bd98/a07d816658b00aed1223fef74c478cfb21f5.pdf (April 2018).Google Scholar
Altmann, Heidi. 2006. The perception and production of second language stress: A crosslinguistic experimental study. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Delaware.Google Scholar
Amer, Faten, Bilal Adaileh & Abu-Rakhieh, Belal. 2011. Arabic diglossia: A phonological study. Argumentum Debreceni Egyetemi Kiadó 7, 19–36.Google Scholar
Al-Wer, Enam. 2007. Jordanian Arabic. In Versteegh et al. (eds.), 506–517.Google Scholar
Beckman, Jill, Laura Walsh & Urbanczyk, Suzanne (eds.). 1995. Papers in Optimality Theory (University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers 18). Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Amherst, GLSA.Google Scholar
Blevins, Juliette. 2004. Evolutionary phonology: The emergence of sound patterns. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boersma, Paul & Weenink, David. 2015. PRAAT: Doing phonetics by computer. Version 1.4.9. http://www.praat.org (January 2015). [computer program]Google Scholar
Brame, Michael K. 1974. The Cycle in phonology: Stress in Palestinian, Maltese, and Spanish. Linguistic Inquiry 5.1, 39–60.Google Scholar
Broselow, Ellen. 1992. Parametric variation in Arabic dialect phonology. In Broselow, Ellen, Eid, Mushira & McCarthy, John [J.] (eds.), Perspectives on Arabic linguistics IV, 7–45. Amsterdam & Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broselow, Ellen, Chen, Su-I. & Huffman, Marie. 1997. Syllable weight: Convergence of phonology and phonetics. Phonology 14.1, 47–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burzio, Luigi. 2011. Derived environment effects. In van Oostendorp et al. (eds.), 2089–2014.Google Scholar
Calabrese, Andrea & Wetzels, Leo (eds.). 2009. Loan phonology (Amsterdam Studies in the Theory and History of Linguistic Science, Series IV: Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 307). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Catford, John Cunnison. 1977. Fundamental problems in phonetics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Crawford, Clifford James. 2009. Adaptation and transmission in Japanese loanword phonology. Ph.D. dissertation, Cornell University.Google Scholar
Curtis, Emily. 2003. Geminate weight: Case studies and formal models. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Washington.Google Scholar
Davis, Stuart. 1994. Loanwords: Phonological treatment. In Asher, Ronald E. (ed.), The encyclopedia of language and linguistics, vol. 4, 2273–2276. New York & Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Davis, Stuart. 2011. Geminates. In van Oostendorp et al. (eds.), 873–898.Google Scholar
Davis, Stuart & Ragheb, Marwa. 2014. Geminate representation in Arabic. In Farwaneh, Samira & Ouali, Hamid (eds.), Perspectives on Arabic linguistics XXIV–XXV, 3–19. Philadelphia, PA & Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Embarki, Mohamed. 2013. Phonetics. In Owens, Jonathan (ed.), The Oxford handbook of Arabic linguistics, 23–44. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Farwaneh, Samira. 1995. Directionality effects in Arabic dialect syllable structure. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Utah.Google Scholar
Farwaneh, Samira. 2009. Toward a typology of Arabic dialects: The role of final consonantality. Journal of Arabic and Islamic Studies 9, 82–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frisch, Stefan A. 2011. Frequency effects. In van Oostendorp et al. (eds.), 2137–2163.Google Scholar
Goldsmith, John, Riggle, Jason & Yu, Alan CL (eds.). 2011. The handbook of phonological theory, 2nd edn. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, Matthew. 1999. Syllable weight: Phonetics, phonology, and typology. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California.Google Scholar
Gordon, Matthew. 2011. Stress systems. In Goldsmith et al. (eds.), 141–163.Google Scholar
Gussenhoven, Carlos. 2000. Vowel duration, syllable quantity and stress in Dutch. Ms., University of Nijmegen. http://roa.rutgers.edu/files/381-0200/roa-381-gussenhoven-4.pdf (May 2015).Google Scholar
Halle, Morris & Vergnaud, Jean-Roger. 1987. An essay on stress. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Ham, William. 2001. Phonetic and phonological aspects of geminate timing. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hayes, Bruce. 1989. Compensatory lengthening in moraic phonology. Linguistic Inquiry 20, 253–306.Google Scholar
Hayes, Bruce. 1995. Metrical stress theory: Principles and case studies. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Holes, Clive. 2004. Modern Arabic: Structures, functions, and varieties. London & New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Hulst, Harry G. 2014. The study of word accent and stress: Past, present, and future. In Hulst, Harry G. (ed.), Word stress: Theoretical and typological issues, 3–55. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hume, Elizabeth, Muller, Jennifer & van Engelenhoven, Aone. 1997. Non-moraic geminates in Leti. Phonology 14.3, 371–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyman, Larry. 1985. A theory of phonological weight. Dordrecht: Foris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyde, Brett. 2003. NonFinality. Ms., Washington University in St Louis. http://roa.rutgers.edu/files/633-1103/633-HYDE-0-0.PDF (September 2014).Google Scholar
Hyde, Brett. 2011. Extrametricality and non-finality. In van Oostendorp et al. (eds.), 1027–1051.Google Scholar
Ito, Junko, Kubozono, Haruo & Mester, [R.] Armin. 2017. A prosodic account of consonant gemination in Japanese loanwords. In Kubozono, Haruo (ed.), The phonetics and phonology of geminate consonants, 283–320. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ito, Junko & Mester, [R.] Armin. 1995. The core–periphery structure of the lexicon and constraints on re-ranking. In Beckman et al. (eds.), 181–209.Google Scholar
Iverson, Gregory K. & Lee, Ahrong. 2006. Perception of contrast in Korean loanword adaptation. Korean Linguistics 13, 49–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kager, René. 1999. Optimality Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kang, Yoonjung. 2002. Loanword phonology in Korean. Ms., Hanyang University, Seoul.Google Scholar
Khattab, Ghada & Al-Tamimi, Jalal. 2013. Influence of geminate structure on early Arabic templatic patterns. In Vihman, Marilyn M. & Keren-Portnoy, Tamar (eds.), The emergence of phonology: Whole word approaches, and cross-linguistic evidence, 374–414. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul. 2003. Syllables and moras in Arabic. In Féry, Caroline & van de Vijver, Ruben (eds.), The syllable in Optimality Theory, 147–182. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirchner, Robert. 1996. More on opacity: The chain shift problem. Ms., University of Alberta.Google Scholar
Kroll, Margaret Ilona. 2014. Vowel and consonant lengthening in Finnish loanword adaptation. MA thesis, University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Kubozono, Haruo. 1999. Mora and syllable. In Tsujimura, Natsuko (ed.), The handbook of Japanese linguistics, 31–61. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kubozono, Haruo, Ito, Junko & Mester, [R.] Armin. 2008. Consonant gemination in Japanese loanword phonology. In The Linguistic Society of Korea (eds.), Current issues in unity and diversity of languages, 953–973. Republic of Korea: Dongam Publishing Co. [Collection of papers selected from the 18th International Congress of Linguists]Google Scholar
LaCharité, Darlene & Paradis, Carole. 2005. Category preservation and proximity versus phonetic approximation in loanword adaptation. Linguistic Inquiry 36.2, 223–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, John J. 1979. On stress and syllabification. Linguistic Inquiry 10, 443–465.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John J. 1988. Feature geometry and dependency: A review. Phonetica 45, 84–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, John J. 2007. Morphology. In Versteegh et al. (eds), 297–307.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John J. & Prince, Alan. 1986. Prosodic morphology. Ms., Brandeis University.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John J. & Prince, Alan. 1990. Prosodic morphology and templatic morphology. In Eid, Mushira & McCarthy, John [J.] (eds.), Perspectives on Arabic linguistics II: Papers from The Second Annual Symposium on Arabic Linguistics, 1–54. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John J. & Prince, Alan. 1995. Faithfulness and reduplicative identity. In Beckman et al. (eds.) 249–384.Google Scholar
Mester, R. Armin. 1994. The quantitative trochee in Latin. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 12.1, 1–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, Terence Frederick. 1990. Pronouncing Arabic, vol. 1. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Terence Frederick. 1993. Pronouncing Arabic, vol. 2. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Morandini, Diego. 2007. The phonology of loanwords into Italian. MA thesis, University College London.Google Scholar
Obrecht, Dean H. 1965. Three experiments in the perception of geminate consonants in Arabic. Language and Speech 8.1, 31–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pająk, Bożena. 2009. Context-dependent perception of geminates. Poster presented at the 83rd LSA Annual Meeting, San Francisco, CA.Google Scholar
Paradis, Carole & LaCharité, Darlene. 1997. Preservation and minimality in loanword adaptation. Journal of Linguistics 33, 379–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paradis, Carole & LaCharité, Darlene. 2011. Loanword adaptation: From lessons learned to findings. In Goldsmith et al. (eds.), 751–778.Google Scholar
Parker, Steve. 2011. Sonority. In van Oostendorp et al. (eds.), 1160–1184.Google Scholar
Pater, Joe. 2009. Weighted constraints in generative linguistics. Cognitive Science 33.6, 999–1035.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Prince, Alan & Smolensky, Paul. 1993/2004. Optimality Theory: Constraint interaction in generative grammar (Technical Report CU-CS-696-93, Department of Computer Science, University of Colorado at Boulder, and Technical Report TR-2, Rutgers Centre for Cognitive Science, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ). http://roa.rutgers.edu/files/537-0802/537-0802-PRINCE-0-0.PDF (April 2013).Google Scholar
Proffitt, Michael. 2015. Oxford English dictionary online. https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/ (April 2015).Google Scholar
Repetti, Lori. 2009. Gemination in English loans in American varieties of Italian. In Calabrese & Wetzels (eds.), 225–240.Google Scholar
Reynolds, Elijah. 2012. Prosodic adaptation of Egyptian Arabic loanwords from English. Ms., Indiana University, Bloomington. http://www.academia.edu/29700256/Prosodic_Adaptation_of_Egyptian_Arabic_Loanwords_from_English (July 2018).Google Scholar
Ringen, Catherine & Vago, Robert. 2010. Geminates: Heavy or long? In Cairns, Charles & Raimy, Eric (eds.), Handbook of the syllable, 155–169. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Selkirk, Elisabeth. 1990. A two-root theory of length. University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers 14, 123–171.Google Scholar
Shinohara, Shigeko. 2004. Emergence of universal grammar in foreign word adaptations. In Kager, René, Pater, Joe & Zonneveld, Wim (eds.), Constraints in phonological acquisition, 292–320. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suleiman, Saleh. 1985. Jordanian Arabic between diglossia and bilingualism: Linguistic analysis. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thurgood, Graham. 1993. Geminates: A cross-linguistic examination. In Ashmore Nevis, Joel, McMenamin, Gerald & Thurgood, Graham (eds.), Papers in honor of Frederick H. Brengelman on the occasion of the twenty-fifth anniversary of the Department of Linguistics, CSU Fresno, 129–139. Fresno, CA: Department of Linguistics, California State University.Google Scholar
Topintzi, Nina & Davis, Stuart. 2017. On the weight of edge geminates. In Kubozono, Haruo (ed.), The phonetics and phonology of geminate consonants. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
van Oostendorp, Marc, Ewen, Colin, Hume, Elizabeth & Rice, Keren (eds.). 2011. The Blackwell companion to phonology. Malden, MA & Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vendelin, Inga & Peperkamp, Sharon. 2004. Evidence for phonetic adaptation of loanwords: An experimental study. Actes des Journées d’Etudes Linguistique, 129–131.Google Scholar
Vendelin, Inga & Peperkamp, Sharon. 2006. The influence of orthography on loanword adaptations. Lingua 116.7, 996–1007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Versteegh, Kees, Eid, Mushira, Elgibali, Alaa, Woidich, Manfred & Zaborski, Andrzej (eds.). 2007. Encyclopedia of Arabic language and linguistics. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Watson, Janet C. E. 2002. The phonology and morphology of Arabic. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Watson, Janet C. E. 2007. Syllabification patterns in Arabic dialects: Long segments and mora sharing. Phonology 24, 335–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, Janet C. E. 2011. Word stress in Arabic. In van Oostendorp et al. (eds.), 2990–3018.Google Scholar
Zec, Draga. 1988. Sonority constraints on prosodic structure. Ph.D. dissertation, Stanford University.Google Scholar
Zec, Draga. 2011. Quantity-sensitivity. In van Oostendorp et al. (eds.), 1335–1361.Google Scholar