Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T22:51:49.475Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Fred Weerman, The V-2 conspiracy – a synchronic and diachronic analysis of verbal positions in Germanic languages. (Publications in Language Sciences, 31.) Dordrecht: Foris Publications, 1989. Pp. 263.

Review products

Fred Weerman, The V-2 conspiracy – a synchronic and diachronic analysis of verbal positions in Germanic languages. (Publications in Language Sciences, 31.) Dordrecht: Foris Publications, 1989. Pp. 263.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Alessandra Tomaselli
Alessandra Tomaselli
Affiliation:
University of Pavia/University of Geneva
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Information
Journal of Linguistics , Volume 26 , Issue 2 , September 1990 , pp. 518 - 524
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Belletti, A. (1989). On the morphosyntactic nature of the sequence ‘Aux + Past Participle’ in Italian. To appear in Nespor, M. & Mascarò, J. (eds), Festschrift for Henk van Riemsdijk.Google Scholar
Besten, H. den (1983). On the interaction of root transformations and lexical deletive rules. In Abraham, W. (ed.), On the formal syntax of Westgermania. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 47–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evers, A. (1986a). Long rule accessible arguments in French and German. In Coopmans, P. et al. (eds), Formal parameters of Generative Grammar. Dordrecht: Foris. 73–82.Google Scholar
Evers, A. (1986b). Clause Union in French and German. Groninger Arbeiten zur Germanistischen Linguistik 28. 170–201.Google Scholar
Fabb, N. (1984). Syntactic affixation. MIT: Ph.D. dissertation.Google Scholar
Haider, H. & Prinzhorn, M. (eds) (1986). Verb second phenomena in the Germanic languages. Dordrecht: Foris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moro, A. (1988). Per una teoria unificata delle frasi copulari. Rivista di Grammatica Generativa 13. 81–110.Google Scholar
Platzack, C. (1983). Germanic word order and the COMP/INFL Parameter. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 2.Google Scholar
Pollock, J. Y. (1989). Verb movement, universal grammar and the structure of IP. LIn 20. 365–424.Google Scholar
Rizzi, L. (1987). Three issues in Romance dialectology. Talk given at the Xth GLOW Conference, University of Venice.Google Scholar
Roberts, I. (1985). Agreement parameters and the development of English modal auxiliaries. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 3. 21–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, B. D. & Tornaselli, A. (in press). Some implication from German word order. In Abraham, W. & Reuland, E. (eds), Proceedings of the 5th workshop on comparative German syntax. Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, May 19–20, 1988.Google Scholar