No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Eva Zimmermann, Morphological length and prosodically defective morphemes (Oxford Studies in Phonology and Phonetics 1). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017. Pp. xii + 345.
Review products
Eva Zimmermann, Morphological length and prosodically defective morphemes (Oxford Studies in Phonology and Phonetics 1). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017. Pp. xii + 345.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 March 2019
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Reviews
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019
References
Akinlabi, Akinbiyi. 2011. Featural affixes. In van Oostendorp, Marc, Ewen, Colin J., Hume, Elizabeth & Rice, Keren (eds.), The Blackwell companion to phonology, vol. 4, 1945–1971. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Anderson, Stephen R.
2016. Words and paradigms: Peter H. Matthews and the development of morphological theory. Transactions of the Philological Society
115.1, 1–13.Google Scholar
Bermúdez-Otero, Ricardo. 2012. The architecture of grammar and the division of labour in exponence. In Trommer(ed.), 8–83.Google Scholar
Bye, Patrik & Svenonius, Peter. 2012. Non-concatenative morphology as epiphenomenon. In Trommer (ed.), 427–495.Google Scholar
Iosad, Pavel. 2014. The phonology and morphosyntax of mutation in Breton. Lingue e linguaggio
13.1, 23–42.Google Scholar
Morén, Bruce. 2001. Distinctiveness, coercion, and sonority: A unified theory of weight. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Trommer, Jochen(ed.). 2012. The phonology and morphology of exponence: The state of the art. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar