Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-02T21:01:23.383Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

-ed adjectives revisited

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Magnus Ljung
Affiliation:
Engeiska Institutionen, G¨oteborgs Universitet, Sweden

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Notes and Discussion
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Fillmore, C. (1968). The case for case. In Bach, E. & Harms, R.T. (eds), Universals in Linguistic theory. New York; Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Gordon, D. & Lakoff, G. (1971). Conversational postulates. In Papers from the Seventh Regional Meeting Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Hudson, R.A. (1975). Problems in the analysis of ed-adjectives. JL II: 1.Google Scholar
Ljung, M. (1970). English denominal adjectives. Stockholm; Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
Ljung, M. (1974). Some remarks on antonymy. Lg 50:1.Google Scholar
Marchand, H. (1969). Categories and types of present-day English word formation. 2nd rev. edition. München: C.H. Beck'sche Verlag.Google Scholar
Meys, W. J. (1975). Compound adjectives in English and the ideal speaker–listener. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar