No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Dan Isaac Slobin (ed.), The cross-linguistic study of language acquisition, Vols. 1&2. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1985. Pp. xi + 958, ix + 374. [The volumes are numbered consecutively, with Vol. 2. pp. 906–1332.]
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 November 2008
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Reviews
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1989
References
REFERENCES
Bowerman, M. (1987). Commentary: mechanisms of language acquisition. In MacWhinney, B. (ed.) Mechanisms of language acquisition. Hillsdale. N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 443–466.Google Scholar
Gleitman, L., Gleitman, H., Landay, B. & Wanner, E. (1988). Where learning begins: initial representations for language learning. In Newmeyer, F. J. (ed.) Linguistics: The Cambridge Survey, vol. III. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hopper, P. J. & Thompson, S. (1980). Transitivity in grammar and discourse. Lg 56. 251–299.Google Scholar
Landay, B. & Gleitman, L. (1985). Language and experience: evidence from the blind child. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
MacWhinney, B. (1987). The competition model. In MacWhinney, B. (ed.) Mechanisms of language acquisition. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 249–308.Google Scholar
Pinker, S. (1984). Language learnabilily and language development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Radford, A. (1988). Small children's small clauses. Transactions of the Philological Society 86. 1–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zwicky, A. (1970). A double regularity in the acquisition of English verb morphology. Papers in Linguistics 3. 411–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar