Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T15:38:21.727Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cross-category harmony, X-bar and the predictions of markedness

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

John A. Hawkins
John A. Hawkins
Affiliation:
Department of Linguistics, University of Southern California
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In a recent paper in this journal, Hawkins (1980), it was observed that there was considerable, but quite principled, variation both in the types and in the quantities of word order co-occurrences found in Greenberg's (1966) data (cf. his Appendix I (AI) and Appendix II (AII), reproduced here as Tables 1 and 2 respectively). We formulated two types of universal statements to account for this data: implicational universals, which define permitted versus non-permitted co-occurrences of word orders (matching the attested versus non-attested co-occurrences respectively), and which are of the form ‘if a language has some property (or properties) P, then it will also have some property (or properties) Q’; and a ‘universal of language distribution’, entitled the principle of ‘Cross-Category Harmony’ (CCH), which predicts the different quantities of languages having the permitted co-occurences.2 The present paper is intended as a sequel to the last. We now relate our universals to the cross-category, X-bar, generalizations of generative grammar and to issues of markedness, suggesting that our universals and X-bar theory can be of mutual benefit to one another.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Linguistics , Volume 18 , Issue 1 , March 1982 , pp. 1 - 35
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bresnan, J. (1976). On the form and functioning of transformations. LIn 7. 3–40.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1970). Remarks on nominalization. In Jacobs, R.A. & Rosenbaum, P.S. (eds), Readings in English transformational grammar. Waltham, Mass.: Ginn. 184–221.Google Scholar
Greenberg, J. H. (1966). Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. In Greenberg, J.H. (ed), Universals of language. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T. Press, 73–113.Google Scholar
Halitsky, D. (1975). Left-Branch S's and NP's in English: a bar notation analysis. Linguistic Analysis 1. 279–96.Google Scholar
Hawkins, J. A. (1979). Implicational universals as predictors of word order change. Lg 55·3.618–48.Google Scholar
Hawkins, J. A. (1980). On implicational and distributional universals of word order. JL 16·2. 193–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackendoff, R. (1977). syntax: a study of phrase structure. Linguistic Inquiry Monograph No.2. Cambridge, Mass. M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
Lightfoot, D. W. (1979). Principles of diachronic syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lightfoot, D. W. (1980). Constraining phrase structure rules. Lecture given to the Dept. of Linguistics, U.S.C., 03 1980.Google Scholar
Ross, J. R. (1967). Constraints on variables in syntax. M.I.T. Ph.D. diss.Google Scholar
Vennemann, T. (1972). Analogy in generative grammar: the origin of word order. Paper read at the 11th International Congress of Linguists, Bologna.Google Scholar
Vennemann, T. (1974a). Topics, subjects and word order: from SXV to SVX via TVX. In Anderson, J. M. & Jones, C. (eds), Historical linguistics. Amsterdam: North Holland.339–376.Google Scholar
Vennemann, T. (1974b). Theoretical word order studies: results and problems. Papiere zur Linguistik 7, 5–25.Google Scholar
Vennemann, T. (1975). An explanation of drift. In Li, C. N. (ed), Word order and word order change. Austin: University of Texas Press. 269–305.Google Scholar
Vennemann, T. (1976). Categorial grammar and the order of meaningful elements. In Juilland, A. (ed), Linguistic studies offered to Joseph Greenberg on the occasion of his sixtieth birthday. Saratoga, California: Anma Libri. 615–634.Google Scholar
Vennemann, T. & Harlow, R. (1977). Categorial grammar and consistent basic VX serialization. Theoretical linguistics 4. 227–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar