Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T17:17:52.548Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Constraining Welsh vowel mutation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 June 2007

S. J. HANNAHS
Affiliation:
Newcastle University

Abstract

Welsh vowel mutation is a purely positional vowel alternation, the effects of which serve to obscure phonemic contrasts between three vowels in the system, namely barred-i, schwa and [u]. The theoretical interest in this alternation stems from the surface orientation of current phonological theory: is such a non-surface-true state of affairs amenable to plausible modelling in an optimality-theoretic framework, or are the relevant relationships best accounted for through lexical listing? In this paper I argue that a straightforward optimality-theoretic account is available and that this account is simpler than any of its predecessors. The analysis differs from previous derivational analyses (e.g. Thomas 1979, 1984; Williams 1983; Bosch 1996) in various ways, including the underlying values of some of the vowels involved, the avoidance of ad hoc extrinsic rule ordering, and the lack of reliance on intermediate representations. Furthermore, reference to phonological position alone is sufficient, with no need to refer either to stress or to morphological complexity. The correct results emerge primarily through the interaction of a high-ranking structural constraint prohibiting schwa in a final syllable, an input–output faithfulness constraint on vowel features, and a constraint prohibiting a high central rounded vowel, [u with bar through].

Type
Research Article
Copyright
2007 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

I have benefitted from numerous comments on various incarnations of this work at different times from many colleagues, including Gwen Awbery, David Willis, Bob Morris Jones, Ricardo Bermúdez-Otero, Carol Fehringer, participants at several LAGB meetings and, especially, Maggie Tallerman. I am also indebted to two anonymous referees for Journal of Linguistics, whose perceptive and thoughtful comments improved the paper. None of the above-named agrees with everything here. It is with sadness that I acknowledge my debt to the late Dr Lewis Davies for unfailingly kind help with data questions – heddwch i'w lwch.