Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T19:27:21.304Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Chain effects in Kurpian

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 June 2019

JERZY RUBACH Open the ORCID record for JERZY RUBACH [Opens in a new window]
JERZY RUBACH*
Affiliation:
University of Iowa & University of Warsaw
*
Author’s address: Instytut Anglistyki, Uniwersytet Warszawski, ul. Hoża 69, 00-681 Warszawa, Poland[email protected]& Department of Linguistics, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article considers chain effects in Kurpian. It is observed that initial i triggers j-Insertion. The inserted [j] induces a lowering process, whereby /i/ changes into [e] or [ə], depending on the context. This change destroys the original trigger of j-Insertion, making the process opaque, as in jënteres [jəntɛrɛs] ‘interest’, which exhibits the following chain: i → ji → jə . I argue that chain effects cannot be modeled in Standard Optimality Theory, including its auxiliary theories: Max Feature theory, Sympathy theory and Candidate Chains theory. Consequently, chain effects constitute evidence for derivational levels envisaged by Derivational Optimality Theory. In particular j-Insertion must take place before /i/ is turned into [e] or [ə] because these vowels cannot trigger glide insertion.

Keywords

chain effectsderivationalismKurpian phonologyOptimality Theory
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Linguistics , Volume 56 , Issue 3: Aspect beyond time , 01 August 2020 , pp. 663 - 690
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

I would like to thank the three anonymous Journal of Linguistics referees for discussion and criticism, which led to considerable improvement of both the content and the presentation of my analysis. However, let me add that the responsibility for this article is solely mine. I would also like to thank my Kurpian consultants: Henryk Gadomski, Tadeusz Grec, Mirosław Grzyb, Krystyna Łaszczych, Krystyna Mrozowska, Stefania Prusaczyk, Danuta Staszewska, and Irena Bachmura.

References

Benua, Laura. 1997. Transderivational identity: Phonological relations between words. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
Bermúdez-Otero, Ricardo. 1999. Constraint interaction in language change: Quantity in English and Germanic. Ph.D. dissertation, The University of Manchester.Google Scholar
Dejna, Karol. 1973. Dialekty polskie [Polish dialects]. Wrocław: Zakład Narodowy im. Ossolińskich.Google Scholar
Friedrich, Henryk. 1955. Fonetyka i fonologia gwary kurpiowskiej [Phonetics and phonology of the Kurpian dialect]. Wrocław: Zakład Narodowy im. Ossolińskich.Google Scholar
Jespersen, Otto. 1904. Lehrbuch der Phonetik [Textbook of phonetics]. Leipzig & Berlin: B. G. Teubner.Google Scholar
Kawasaki, Haruko. 1982. An acoustical basis for universal constraints on sound sequences. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul. 1997. LP and OT. Presented at Cornell Linguistic Institute, Ithaca, NY. [Handout]Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul. 2000. Opacity and cyclicity. The Linguistic Review 17, 351–365.Google Scholar
Lombardi, Linda. 1998. Evidence for Max Feature constraints from Japanese. University of Maryland Working Papers in Linguistics 7, 41–62.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John J. 1999. Sympathy and phonological opacity. Phonology 16, 331–399.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John J. 2002. Sympathy, cumulativity, and the Duke-of-York gambit. In Féry, Caroline & van de Vijer, Ruben (eds.), The optimal syllable, 23–76. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John J. 2007. Hidden generalizations. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John J. & Prince, Alan. 1995. Faithfulness and reduplicative identity. In Beckman, Jill N., Dickey, Laura Walsh & Urbanczyk, Suzanne (eds.), Papers in Optimality Theory (University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers in Linguistics 18), 249–384. Amherst, MA: Graduate Linguistic Student Association (GSLA).Google Scholar
Prince, Alan & Paul, Smolensky. 2004. Optimality Theory: Constraint interaction in generative grammar. Oxford: Blackwell. [Revision of 1993 technical report, Rutgers University Center for Cognitive Sciences. Available on Rutgers Optimality Archive, ROA-537.]Google Scholar
Rubach, Jerzy. 1997. Extrasyllabic consonants in Polish: Derivational Optimality Theory. In Roca, Iggy (ed.), Derivations and constraints in phonology, 551–581. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rubach, Jerzy. 1998. A Slovak argument for the onset–rhyme distinction. Linguistic Inquiry 29, 168–179.Google Scholar
Rubach, Jerzy. 2000a. Glide and glottal stop insertion in Slavic languages: A DOT analysis. Linguistic Inquiry 31, 271–317.Google Scholar
Rubach, Jerzy. 2000b. Backness switch in Russian. Phonology 17, 39–64.Google Scholar
Rubach, Jerzy. 2003a. Duke-of-York derivations in Polish. Linguistic Inquiry 34, 601–629.Google Scholar
Rubach, Jerzy. 2003b. Polish palatalization in Derivational Optimality Theory. Lingua 113, 197–237.Google Scholar
Rubach, Jerzy. 2007. A conspiracy of gliding processes in Polish. Journal of Slavic Linguistics 15, 325–357.Google Scholar
Rubach, Jerzy. 2009. Zasady pisowni kurpiowskiego dialektu literackiego [Orthographic principles of the literary dialect of Kurpian]. Ostrołęka: Związek Kurpiów.Google Scholar
Rubach, Jerzy. 2011a. The vocalic system of Kurpian. Studies in Polish Linguistics 6, 81–98.Google Scholar
Rubach, Jerzy. 2011b. Syllabic repairs in Macedonian. Lingua 121, 237–268.Google Scholar
Rubach, Jerzy. 2014a. Soft labial conspiracy in Kurpian. Journal of Linguistics 50, 185–230.Google Scholar
Rubach, Jerzy. 2014b. Final tensing in Kurpian. Studies in Polish Linguistics 9, 45–65.Google Scholar
Selkirk, Elizabeth O. 1982. On the major class features and syllable theory. In Aronoff, Mark & Oehrle, Richard T. (eds.), Language sound structure: Studies in phonology presented to Morris Halle by his teacher and students, 107–136. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Wood, Sidney A. J. 1975. Tense and lax vowels: Degree of constriction or pharyngeal volume? Working Papers in Linguistics 1, 109–134. [Lund University]Google Scholar
Zduńska, Helena. 1965. Studia nad fonetyką gwar mazowieckich. Konsonantyzm [Phonetics of Mazovian dialects: Consonantal systems]. Wrocław: Zakład Narodowy im. Ossolińskich.Google Scholar