Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T15:45:56.399Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Another look at definites in existentials

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Yael Ziv
Yael Ziv
Affiliation:
Department of English, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Existential sentences have usually been defined on the basis of their morpho-syntactic characteristics. In English, the term has been used to designate those sentences in which the unstressed, non-deictic there occurs. It has been further observed that most such sentences contain the verb be, an indefinite NP and a locative adverbial following there in that order. Despite this syntactic characterization, however, the term ‘existential sentence’ has been taken, erroneously, to refer to some semantic features of the sentence as well, and so it has been generally assumed that existential sentences always assert the existence of some entity.1

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Linguistics , Volume 18 , Issue 1 , March 1982 , pp. 73 - 88
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Berman-Aronson, R. (1978). Modern Hebrew structure. Tel-Aviv: University Publishing Projects.Google Scholar
Berman, (Aronson) R. & Grosu, A. (1976). Aspects of the copula in Modern Hebrew. In Cole, P. (ed.), Studies in Modern Hebrew syntax and semantics. Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing Company. 265–285.Google Scholar
Bolinger, D. (1977). Meaning and form. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Clark, E. V. (1970). Locationals: a study of the relations between ‘existential’, ‘locative’ and ‘possessive’ constructions. In Working papers in language universats. Stanford University.Google Scholar
Erteschik-Shir, N. & Lappin, S. (ms.). A functional theory of sentence stress in English.Google Scholar
Fauconnier, G. (1975). Pragmatic scales and logical structure. Lln 6. 353–376.Google Scholar
Green, G. M. (1974). Semantics and syntactic regularity. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Kuno, S. (1971). The position of locatives in existential sentences. Lln 2. 333–378.Google Scholar
Kuno, S. (1973). The Structure of the Japanese language. Cambridge, Ma: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
Langendoen, D. T. (1966). The syntax of the English expletive ‘it’. In Georgetown monographs on languages and linguistics 19. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University.Google Scholar
McCawley, J.D. (1968). Lexical insertion in a transformational grammar without deep structure. In Papers from the fourth regional meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society. 71–80.Google Scholar
Milsark, G.L. (1974). Existential sentences in English. M.I.T. Dissertation.Google Scholar
Milsark, G. L. (1977). Toward an explanation of certain peculiarities of the existential construction in English. Linguistic Analysis 3. 1–30.Google Scholar
Nunberg, G. D. (1978). The pragmatics of reference. University of California, Berkeley. Dissertation.Google Scholar
Perlmutter, D. (1970). On the article in English. In Bierwisch, M. and Heidolph, K. E. (eds.) Progress in linguistics. The Hague: Mouton. 233–248.Google Scholar
Postal, P. M. (1969). Anaphoric islands. In Papers from the fifth regional meeting of tile Chicago Linguistic Society. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society. 203–239.Google Scholar
Rando, E. & Napoli, D. J. (1978). Definites in ‘there’ sentences. Lg 54:2. 300–313.Google Scholar
Taglicht, J. (forthcoming). Intonation and contrast. To appear in JL.Google Scholar
Ziv, Y. (1976). On the reanalysis of grammatical terms in Hebrew possessive constructions. In Cole, P. (ed), Studies in Modern Hebrew syntax and semantics. Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing Company. 129–152.Google Scholar
Ziv, .Y (forthcoming). On the existential - locative - possessive continuum.Google Scholar