Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-5r2nc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-24T06:51:06.774Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ana Aguilar-Guevara, Bert Le Bruyn &Joost Zwarts (eds.), Weak referentiality (Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 219).Amsterdam & Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, 2014. Pp. xii + 390.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 February 2016

Albert Ortmann  and
Jens Fleischhauer
Albert Ortmann*
Affiliation:
Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf
Jens Fleischhauer*
Affiliation:
Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf
*
Author’s address: Institut für Sprache und Information, Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, Universitätsstraße 1, D-40225 Düsseldorf, Germany[email protected]
Author’s address: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Information
Journal of Linguistics , Volume 52 , Issue 1 , 01 March 2016 , pp. 218 - 223
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barker, Chris. 2005. Possessive weak definites. In Kim, Ji-yung, Lander, Yury A. & Partee, Barbara H. (eds.), Possessives and beyond: Semantics and syntax, 89–113. Amherst, MA: GLSA.Google Scholar
Borik, Olga & Gehrke, Berit (eds.). 2015. The syntax and semantics of pseudo-incorporation. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlson, Greg & Sussman, Rachel. 2005. Seemingly indefinite definites. In Kepser, Stephan & Reis, Marga (eds.), Linguistic evidence: Empirical, theoretical and computational perspectives, 71–86. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dayal, Vaneeta. 2011. Hindi pseudo-incorporation. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 29, 123–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farkas, Donka & de Swart, Henriëtte. 2003. The semantics of incorporation: From argument structure to discourse transparency. Stanford, CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Poesio, Massimo. 1994. Weak definites. In Mandy, Harvey & Santelmann, Lynn (eds.), Proceedings of the 4th Semantics and Linguistic Theory Conference (SALT IV), 282–299. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University.Google Scholar
von Heusinger, Klaus. 2011. Specificity. In von Heusinger, Klaus, Maienborn, Claudia & Portner, Paul (eds.), Semantics: An international handbook of natural language meaning, vol. 2, 1025–1058. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar