Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T22:59:21.882Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The unfolding of suprasegmental representations: a cross-linguistic perspective1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Thomas Berg
Affiliation:
University of Oldenburg and Yarmouk University
Hassan Abd-El-Jawad
Affiliation:
University of Oldenburg and Yarmouk University

Extract

An analysis of phonological speech errors in Arabic, English and German is carried out with a view to probing into the organization of segments within syllables and words. Arabic slips are shown to be less structure-sensitive than English and German ones. Being absent from underlying representation, suprasegmental structures are assumed to unfold gradually in real time. The erection of hierarchical representations is claimed to be slower in Arabic than in English and German because the nonconcatenative morphology of Arabic prevents an early assignment of consonants to structural slots. In contrast, English and German words allow the early build-up of hierarchical structures because sufficient phonological information is available from the beginning of the derivation.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abd-El-Jawad, Hassan & Abu-Salim, Issam M. (1987). Slips of the tongue in Arabic and their theoretical implications. Language Sciences 9. 145171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abu-Salim, Issam M. (1982). Syllable structure and syllabification in Palestinian Arabic. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences 12. 128.Google Scholar
Abu-Salim, Issam M. (1988). Syllable structure constraints and the sonority hierarchy in Arabic. Dirasat 15. 4477.Google Scholar
Abu-Salim, Issam M. & Abd-El-Jawad, Hassan (1988). Syllable patterns in Levantine Arabic. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences 18. 122.Google Scholar
Angoujard, Jean-Pierre (1990). Metrical structure of Arabic. Dordrecht: Foris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berg, Thomas (1988). Die Abbildung des Sprachproduktionsprozesses in einem Aktivationsfluβmodell. Untersuchungen an deutschen und englischen Versprechern. Tübingen: Niemeyer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berg, Thomas (1989). Intersegmental cohesiveness. Folia Linguistica 23. 245280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berg, Thomas (1991). Phonological processing in a syllable-timed language with pre-final stress: evidence from Spanish speech error data. Language and Cognitive Processes 6. 265301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berg, Thomas (in press). Linguistic structure and change: an explanation from language processing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Booij, Geert E. (1983). Principles and parameters in prosodic phonology. Linguistics 21. 249280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broselow, Ellen (1979). Cairene Arabic syllable structure. Linguistic Analysis 5. 345382.Google Scholar
Chen, Matthew (1970). Vowel length variation as a function of the voicing of the consonant environment. Phonetica 22. 129159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clements, George N. & Keyser, Samuel J. (1983). CV phonology: a generative theory of the syllable. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Dell, Gary S., Juliano, Cornell & Govindjee, Anita (1993). Structure and content in language production: a theory of frame constraints in phonological speech errors. Cognitive Science 17. 149195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donegan, Patricia J. & Stampe, David (1978). The syllable in phonological and prosodic structure. In Bell, Alan & Hooper, Joan B. (eds.) Syllables and segments. Amsterdam: North Holland. 2534.Google Scholar
Dow, Maureen L. & Derwing, Bruce L. (1989). Experimental evidence for syllable-internal structure. In Corrigan, Roberta, Eckman, Fred & Noonan, Michael (eds.) Linguistic categorization. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 8192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, Laurie B., Frost, Ram & Pnini, Tamar (1995). Decomposing words into their constituent morphemes: evidence from English and Hebrew. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 21. 947960.Google ScholarPubMed
Fromkin, Victoria A. (1971). The non-anomalous nature of anomalous utterances. Language 47. 2752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fromkin, Victoria A. (1973). Appendix: a sample of speech errors. In Fromkin, Victoria A. (ed.) Speech errors as linguistic evidence. The Hague: Mouton. 243269.Google Scholar
Fudge, Eric C. (1987). Branching structure within the syllable. Journal of Linguistics 23. 359377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldsmith, John A. (1990). Autosegmental and metrical phonology. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph P. (1950). The patterning of root morphemes in Semitic. Word 6. 162181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayes, Bruce (1989). Compensatory lengthening in moraic phonology. Linguistic Inquiry 20. 253306.Google Scholar
Iverson, Gregory K. & Wheeler, Deirdre W. (1989). Phonological categories and constituents. In Corrigan, Roberta, Eckman, Fred & Noonan, Michael (eds.) Linguistic categorization. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 93114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kouloughli, Djamal E. (1986). Sur la structure interne des syllabes “lourdes” en arabe classique. Revue Québecoise de Linguistique 16. 129155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kubozono, Haruo (1989). The mora and syllable structure in Japanese: evidence from speech errors. Language and Speech 32. 249278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laubstein, Ann Stuart (1987). Syllable structure: the speech error evidence. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 32. 339363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levelt, Willem J. M. & Wheeldon, Linda (1994). Do speakers have access to a mental syllabary? Cognition 50. 239269.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levitt, Andrea, Healy, Alice F. & Fendrich, David W. (1991). Syllable-internal structure and the sonority hierarchy: differential evidence from lexical decision, naming, and reading. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 20. 337363.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mackay, Donald G. (1970). Spoonerisms: the structure of errors in the serial order of speech. Neuropsychologia 8. 323350.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCarthy, John J. (1981). A prosodic theory of nonconcatenative morphology. Linguistic Inquiry 12. 373418.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John J. (1986). OCP effects: gemination and antigemination. Linguistic Inquiry 17. 207263.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John J. (1989). Linear order in phonological representation. Linguistic Inquiry 20. 7199.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John J. & Prince, Alan (1990). Prosodic morphology and templatic morphology. In Eid, Mushira & McCarthy, John J. (eds.) Perspectives on Arabic linguistics. (Vol. II.) Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 154.Google Scholar
Nooteboom, Sieb G. (1967). Spontane fonologische versprekingen. (IPO Technical Progress Report No. 93). Eindhoven, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Odden, David (1994). Adjacency parameters in phonology. Language 70. 289330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Port, Robert F., Al-Ani, Salman & Maeda, Shosaku (1980). Temporal compensation and universal phonetics. Phonetica 37. 235252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierrehumbert, Janet & Nair, Rami (1995). Word games and syllable structure. Language and Speech 38. 77114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubach, Jerzy (1993). Skeletal versus moraic representations in Slovac. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 11. 625653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Safi-Stagni, Sabah (1990). Slips of the tongue in Arabic. In Eid, Mushira (ed.) Perspectives on Arabic Linguistics. (Vol. I.) Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 271290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Safi-Stagni, Sabah (1992). Normal and pathological breakdown in Arabic. Ph.D. dissertation, Louisiana State University.Google Scholar
Safi-Stagni, Sabah (1994). Arabic segmental errors and segmental phonology. In Eid, Mushira, Cantarino, Vicente & Walters, Keith (eds.) Perspectives on Arabic linguistics. (Vol. VI.) Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 169184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Selkirk, Elisabeth O. (1982). The syllable. In Van Der Hulst, Harry & Smith, Norval (eds.) The structure of phonological representations. (Part II.) Dordrecht: Foris. 337383.Google Scholar
Sevald, Christine A., Dell, Gary S. & Cole, Jennifer S. (1995). Syllable structure in speech production: are syllable chunks or schemas? Journal of Memory and Language 34. 808820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stemberger, Joseph P. (1983). Speech errors and theoretical phonology: a review. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Stemberger, Joseph P. (1985). The lexicon in a model of language production. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Stemberger, Joseph P. (1990). Wordshape errors in language production. Cognition 35. 123157.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stemberger, Joseph P. (1992). Vocalic underspecification in English language production. Language 68. 492524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stemberger, Joseph P. & Treiman, Rebecca (1986). The internal structure of word-initial consonant clusters. Journal of Memory and Language 25. 163180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steriade, Donca (1988). Review of: Clements & Keyser (1983). Language 64. 118129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, John R. (1995). Linguistic categorization: prototypes in linguistic theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Treiman, Rebecca & Kessler, Brett (1995). In defense of an onset-rime syllable structure for English. Language and Speech 38. 127142.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vennemann, Theo (1988a). Preference laws for syllable structure. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Vennemann, Theo (1988b). The rule dependence of syllable structure. In Duncan-Rose, Caroline & Vennemann, Theo (eds.) On language. Rhetorica, Phonologica, Syntactica. London: Routledge. 257283.Google Scholar
Vincent, Nigel (1986). Constituency and syllable structure. In Durand, Jacques (ed.) Dependency and non-linear phonology. London: Croom Helm. 305318.Google Scholar
Wiese, Richard (1986). Zur Theorie der Silbe. Studium Linguistik 20. 115.Google Scholar
Wilbur, Ronnie B. & Allen, George D. (1991). Perceptual evidence against internal syllable structure in American Sign Language syllables. Language and Speech 34. 2746.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed