We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Online ordering will be unavailable from 17:00 GMT on Friday, April 25 until 17:00 GMT on Sunday, April 27 due to maintenance. We apologise for the inconvenience.
Hostname: page-component-669899f699-swprf
Total loading time: 0
Render date: 2025-04-25T12:44:25.120Z
Has data issue: false
hasContentIssue false
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
Article purchase
Temporarily unavailable
References
REFERENCES
Bhat, D. N. S. (1970). A new hypothesis on language change. IL31. 1–13.Google Scholar
Grammont, M. (1948). Phonétique du grec ancien. Lyons.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, P. (1965). Phonological change. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, P. (1968). Tense and mood in Indo-European syntax. FL4. 30–57.Google Scholar
Kuryłowicz, J. (1967). A remark on Lachmann's law. HSCP72. 295–299.Google Scholar
Thomas, A. R. (1967). Generative phonology in dialectology. TPhS1967. 179–203.Google Scholar
Watkins, C. (1970). A further remark on Lachmann's law. HSCP74. 55–65.Google Scholar