Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T01:53:21.919Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Relativization strategies: NP accessibility in Welsh

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Maggie Tallerman
Maggie Tallerman
Affiliation:
School of English, University of Durham
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

This paper is concerned with strategies for relative clause formation, both in the universal and language-specific sense. It builds on the pioneering work of Keenan & Comrie (1977) and proposes some extensions to this work. The basic issues addressed here concern what exactly ‘case-coding’ strategies in relative clause formation are, why languages should use such strategies, and what form the strategies can take. Language-specific illustration is given from Modern Welsh, a language which exhibits some relativization strategies not discussed by Keenan and Comrie, but which nonetheless broadly supports their proposals.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Linguistics , Volume 26 , Issue 2 , September 1990 , pp. 291 - 314
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Awbery, G. M. (1975). The syntax of Welsh. A transformational study of the passive. Cambridge: C.U.P.Google Scholar
Bresnan, J. & Kanerva, J. (1989). Locative inversion of Chicheŵa: a case study of factorization in grammar. LIn 20. 1–50.Google Scholar
Comrie, B. (1981). Language universals and linguistic typology. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Comrie, B. & Keenan, E. L. (1979). Noun phrase accessibility revisited. Lg 55. 649–664.Google Scholar
Fox, B. (1987). The noun phrase accessibility hierarchy reinterpreted: subject primacy or the absolutive hypothesis? Lg 63. 856–870.Google Scholar
Hankamer, J. (1973). Why there are two than's in English. Papers from the 9th Regional Meeting, Chicago Linguistic Society. Chicago: CLS. 179–191.Google Scholar
Harlow, S. J. (1981). Government and relativization in Celtic. In Heny, F. (ed.) Binding and filtering. London: Croom Helm. 213–254.Google Scholar
Harlow, S. J. (1989). The syntax of Welsh soft mutation. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 7. 289–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, M. & Thomas, A. R. (1977). The Welsh language: studies in its syntax and semantics. Cardiff: University of Wales Press.Google Scholar
Keenan, E. (1985). Relative clauses. In Shopen, T. (ed.) Language typology and syntactic description, vol. 2. Cambridge: C.U.P. 141–170.Google Scholar
Keenan, E. & Comrie, B. (1977). NP accessibility and universal grammar. LIn 8. 63–101.Google Scholar
Manaster-Ramer, A. (1979). The other side of accessibility. In Clyne, P. R. et al. (eds.) Papers from the 15th Regional Meeting, Chicago Linguistic Society. Chicago: CLS. 207–219.Google Scholar
Maxwell, D. (1979). Strategies of relativization and NP accessibility. Lg 55. 352–371.Google Scholar
Price, G. (1984). The languages of Britain. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Radford, A. (1979). The functional basis of transformations. Transactions of the Philological Society. 1–42.Google Scholar
Rhys Jones, T. J. (1977). Living Welsh. London: Hodder & Stoughton.Google Scholar
Sadler, L. (1988). Welsh syntax: a Government-Binding approach. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Sproat, R. (1985). Welsh syntax and VSO structure. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 3. 173–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tallerman, M. O. (1987). Mutation and the syntactic structure of Modern Colloquial Welsh. PhD dissertation, University of Hull.Google Scholar
Tallerman, M. O. (1990). VSO word order and consonantal mutation in Welsh. To appear in Linguistics 28.3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
U.I.G.C. (1978). Cymraeg i ddysgwyr. Y Bontfaen: D. Brown a 'i Feibion.Google Scholar
Watkins, T. A. (1976). The Welsh personal pronoun. Word 28. 146–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar