We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Author’s address: Department of Linguistics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 105 Smith Building, CB # 3155, Chapel Hill, NC27599, USA[email protected]
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
References
REFERENCES
Alexiadou, Artemis, Haegeman, Liliane & Stavrou, Melita. 2007. Noun phrase in the generative perspective. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruening, Benjamin. 2020. The head of the nominal is N, not D: N-to-D movement, hybrid agreement, and conventionalized expressions. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics5, 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 2008. On phases. In Freidin, RobertOtero, Carlos P. & Zubizarreta, Maria Luisa (eds.), Foundational issues in linguistic theory: Essays in honor of Jean-Roger Vergnaud, 133–166. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Giusti, Giuliana. 2015. Nominal syntax at the interfaces: A comparative analysis of languages with articles. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Hooper, Joan B. & Thompson, Sandra A.. 1973. On the applicability of root transformations. Linguistic Inquiry4, 465–497.Google Scholar