No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
The Major Dialects of Nyamwezi and Their Relationship to Sukuma: A Time-Based Perspective
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 14 January 2014
Abstract
This paper identifies the main dialects within Nyamwezi, a Bantu language of Tanzania, and clarifies the historical relationship between these Nyamwezi (F.22) dialects and Sukuma (F.21). I claim, contrary to the conventional wisdom regarding these languages, that a rough linguistic border exists, which separates the Nyamwezi varieties from Sukuma. By implication, Sukuma and Nyamwezi do not exist in a dialect continuum with one another, and the Ndala lect described in Maganga and Schadeberg (1992) should be considered Sukuma. These claims are supported by primarily lexical and phonological evidence gathered during recent surveys conducted by SIL International. Furthermore, Batibo's (2000) relative chronology of the main innovations considered in this present study (*c/*j fricativization, Bantu spirantization, Dahl's Law, and *p-lenition) is re-examined in light of this new evidence. This paper demonstrates how diachronic dialectology can shed light on the dualistic processes of divergence and convergence in Bantu, and the resulting spread of linguistic innovation.
- Type
- Articles
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013
References
Abrahams, R. G.
1967. The Peoples of Greater Unyamwezi, Tanzania (Nyamwezi, Sukuma, Sumbwa, Kimbu, Konongo). (Ethnographic Survey of Africa, East Central Africa, 17). London: International African Institute.Google Scholar
Batibo, Herman M.
1985. Le kesukuma, langue bantu de Tanzanie: phonologie, morphologie. Paris: Editions recherche sur les civilisations.Google Scholar
Batibo, Herman M.
2000. The State of Spirantization in Sukuma-Nyamwezi: A Historical Account. In K. K. Kulikoyela & M. Mous (eds), Lugha za Tanzania/The Languages of Tanzania: Papers in Memory of C. Maganga. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 18–25.Google Scholar
Bailey, Charles-James N.
1996. Essays on time-based linguistic analysis. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Bastin, Yvonne & Schadeberg, Thilo C. (eds). 2009. Bantu Lexical Reconstructions 3. Software. Downloaded from: http://www.metafro.be/blr; 18 October, 2010.Google Scholar
Bostoen, Koen. 2008. Bantu spirantization: Morphologization, lexicalization and historical classification. Diachronica
25(3):299–356.Google Scholar
Bryant, David & Moulton, Vincent. 2004. Neighbor-Net: An agglomerative method for the construction of phylogenetic networks. Molecular Biology and Evolution
21(2):255–265.Google Scholar
Hock, Hans Henrich. 1991. Principles of historical linguistics. 2nd edn. Berlin: Mouton de Gruy-ter Original edition.Google Scholar
Holden, Clare J. & Gray, Russell D.. 2006. Rapid Radiation, Borrowing and Dialect Continua in the Bantu Languages. In P. Forster & C. Renfrew (eds), Phylogenetic methods and the prehistory of languages. Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archeological Research, 19–31.Google Scholar
Huson, Daniel H. & Bryant, David. 2010. SplitsTree4, Version 4.11.3 Downloaded from: http://www.splitstree.org/; 1 February, 2011.Google Scholar
Hyman, Larry M.
1999. The Historical Interpretation of Vowel Harmony in Bantu. In J.-M. Hombert & L. M. Hyman (eds), Bantu historical linguistics: Theoretical and empirical perspectives. Stanford: CSLI, 235–295.Google Scholar
Hyman, Larry M.
2003. Segmental Phonology. In D. Nurse & G. Philippson (eds), The Bantu languages. New York: Routledge, 42–58.Google Scholar
Lewis, Paul M. (ed). 2009. Ethnologue: Languages of the World, Sixteenth edition. Dallas, Tex: SIL International. Online version: http://www.ethnologue.com/
Google Scholar
Maganga, Clement & Schadeberg, Thilo C.. 1992. Kinyamwezi: Grammar, texts, vocabulary. Köln: Rüdiger, Köppe, Verlag.Google Scholar
Maddieson, Ian. 2003. The Sounds of the Bantu Languages. In D. Nurse & G. Philippson (eds), The Bantu languages. New York: Routledge, 15–41.Google Scholar
Maho, Jouni Filip. 2009. New Updated Guthrie List, NUGL Online. Viewed on World Wide Web at: http://goto.glocalnet.net/mahopapers/nuglonline.pdf 18 October, 2010.Google Scholar
Masele, Balla F. Y. P.
2001. The Linguistic History of Sisuumbwa, Kisukuma and Kinyamweezi in Bantu Zone F. PhD dissertation. St. Johns: Memorial University of NewfounDahl's Lawand.Google Scholar
Mühlhäusler, Peter. 1996. Introduction. In C.-J. N. Bailey (ed.), Essays on time-based linguistic analysis. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Nurse, Derek. 1988. The diachronic background to the language communities of SW Tanzania. Sprache und Geschichte in Afrika
9, 15–115.Google Scholar
Nurse, Derek. 1999. Towards a Historical Classification of East African Bantu Languages. In J.-M. Hombert & L. M. Hyman (eds), Bantu historical linguistics: Theoretical and empirical perspectives. Stanford: CSLI, 1–41.Google Scholar
Nurse, Derek & Hinnebusch, Thomas J.. 1993. Swahili and Sabaki: A linguistic history. Berkeley, Los Angeles, London: University of California.Google Scholar
Pelkey, Jamin R.
2011. Dialectology as dialectic: Interpreting Phula variation. Berlin, New York: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Roth, Tim.
2011. The Genetic Classification of Wungu: Implications for Bantu Historical Linguistics. Master's thesis. Langley: Trinity Western University.Google Scholar
Schadeberg, Thilo C.
2003. Historical linguistics. In D. Nurse & G. Philippson (eds), The Bantu languages. New York: Routledge, 143–163.Google Scholar
Stewart, John M.
2000. Symmetric Versus Asymmetric Vowel Height Harmony and e,o Versus ɪ, ℧ in Proto-Bantu and Proto-Savanna Bantu. Journal of West African Languages
28(2):45–58.Google Scholar